We have never been Latourians!

religious pluralism & new materialism in Bruno Latour’s ‘Terrarism’

Autores

  • Fernando Suárez Müller Department of Philosophy and Humanism, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2024v10n2e-6884

Palavras-chave:

Latour; Lovelock; Gaia philosophy; objective idealism, panentheism, new materialism; postmodernism; religion; eco-humanism.

Resumo

: In his works on ecological philosophy, Bruno Latour develops an interesting ontology. He proposes a new worldview, in which religion is reinterpreted in view of a Gaian philosophy. He extends ‘pluralism’ beyond the anthropocentrism that dominates modern humanism. In his book Facing Gaia Latour includes nonhuman beings in a larger community and works towards a larger concept of eco-humanism. In this paper, I try to reconstruct his position by showing that the philosophical foundation for his interpretation of ontology is to be classified as a form of new materialism. This new interpretation of materialism has postmodernist origins (inspired by Gilles Deleuze), but it is not identical to it, because Latour explicitly distances himself from ‘postmodernism’. He wants to contribute to a ‘positive’ ontology. My point is that Latour’s materialist grounding of ontology, which he tries to elaborate in order to make a religious pluralism possible, obstructs any foundation of transcendence and, finally, congests a pluralistic ecumene, because it renounces to the idea of the ‘whole’ and a unitary principle of being. His ideas on eco-humanism and pluralistic ecumene could gain momentum if we opted for a more holistic and idealistic way of thinking. In my last section I show how this is possible: objective idealism and panentheism are conceived as models that belong together and can offer a viable alternative for modern versions of materialism.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

AUDIER, Serge. La Société écologique et ses ennemies. Pour une histoire alternative de l’émancipation. La Découverte: Paris, 2017.

AUDIER, Serge. L’Âge productiviste. Hégémonie Prométhéene, brèches et alternatives écologiques. La Découverte: Paris, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.audie.2019.01

BARAD, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press: Durham, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq

BARROW, John. Frank Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

BEISER, Frederick. German Idealism. The Struggle against Subjectivism, Harvard University Press: Cambridge (M.), 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020702

BENNETT, Jane. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press: Durham, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

BOURDEAU, Michel. “Auguste Comte”, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University: Stanford, 2014.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. Metamorphoses. Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Polity Press: Cambridge, 2002.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity Press: Cambridge, 2013.

COMTE, Auguste Cours de philosophie positive (1830-1842), 2 v. Hermann: Paris, (1975[1830]).

CONNOLLY, William E. Facing the Planetary. Entangled Humanism and the Politics of Swarming.Duke University Press: Durham, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373254

COOPER, John W. Panentheism. The Other God of the Philosophers, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids (Michigan), 2006.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Mille-Plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2. Minuit: Paris, 1980.

DUNHAM, Jeremy; GRANT, Iain Hamilton; WATSON, Sean. Idealism. The History of a Philosophy. Routledge: New York, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773594753

GABRIEL, Markus. Transcendental Ontology. Essays in German Idealism. Continuum: London, 2011.

GABRIEL, Markus. Fields of Sense. A New Rationalist Ontology, Edingburgh University Press: Edingburgh, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748692903

GALINIER, Jacques; MOLINIÉ, Antoinette. The Neo-Indians. A Religion of the Third Millennium. University of Colorado Press: Boulder, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607322740

GUATTARI, Félix. Chaosmose. Galilée: Paris, 1992

GUATTARI, Félix. Qu’est-ce que l’Écosophie. Lignes: Paris, 2013.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. Die okzidentale Konstellation von Glauben und Wissen, v.1; Vernünftige Freiheit. Spüren des Diskurses über Glauben und Wissen, v. 2. Suhrkamp Verlag: Berlin, 2019.

HARTMANN, Nicolaï. Neue Wege der Ontologie. Kohlhammer: Stuttgart, 1942.

HÖSLE, Vittorio. Philosophie der ökologischen Krise. Beck: München, 1990.

HÖSLE, Vittorio. Moral und Politik. Grundlagen einer politischen Ethik für das 21. Jahrhundert. Beck: München, 1997.

HÖSLE, Vittorio. Die Philosophie und die Wissenschaften. Beck: München, 1999

KASTRUP, Bernardo. Why Materialism is Balony. How true Skeptics know there is no Death and Fathom Answers to Life, the Universe, and Everything. IffBooks: Hampshire, 2014.

LATOUR, Bruno. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. La Découverte: Paris, 1991.

LATOUR, Bruno. Pasteur, une science, un style, un siècle. Perrin: Paris, 1994.

LATOUR, Bruno. Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. La Découverte: Paris, 1999.

LATOUR, Bruno. On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Duke University Press: Durham, 2010a.

LATOUR, Bruno. “An Attempt of a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’”, in: New Literary History, no. 41, p.471-490, 2010b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2010.a408295

LATOUR, Bruno. Face à Gaïa. Huit conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique. La Découverte: Paris, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.latou.2015.01

LATOUR, Bruno. Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the Climatic Regime. Polity Press: Cambridge, 2017.

LOVELOCK, James. The Ages of Gaia. A Biography of our Living Earth. Oxford University Press: Oxford, (1995[1988]).

LOVELOCK, James. The Revenge of Gaia. Earth’s Climate Crisis & the Fate of Humanity. Basic Books: New York, 2006.

LOVELOCK, James. Gaia. A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press: Oxford, (2009[1979]).

LOVELOCK, James. A Rough Ride to the Future. Penguin: London, (2015[2014]).

LOVELOCK, James. Novacene. The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence. Penguin: London, (2020[2019]).

MCDOWELL, John. Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Harvard University Press: Cambridge (M.), 2009.

MCGILCHRIST, Iain. The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, perspectiva. E-book version, 2021.

PRIGOGINE, Ilya; TENGERS, Isabelle. Order out of Chaos. Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books: New York, 1984.

PRIMAVESI, Anne. Sacred Gaia. Holistic Theology and Earth System Science. Routledge: London, 2000.

PRIMAVESI, Anne. Gaia’s Gift. Earth, Ourselves and God after Copernicus. Routledge: London, 2003.

PRIMAVESI, Anne. Gaia and Climate Change. A Theology of Gift Events. Routledge: London, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891711

SAFRANSKI, Rüdiger. Romantik. Eine Deutsche Affäre. Hanser Verlag: Hamburg, 2007.

SERRES, Michel. Le Contrat Naturel. Flammarion: Paris, 1990.

TAYLOR, Bron, Dark Green Religion. Nature Spirituality and the Planetary Future. University of California Press: Berkeley, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520944459

TOULMIN, Stephen. Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, (1992[1990).

TOULMIN, Stephen. Return to Reason. Harvard University Press: Cambridge (M.), 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044425

TYLOR, Colin. Common Good Politics. British Idealism and Social Justice in the Contemporary World. Palgrave MacMillan/Springer: Cham, 2017.

WANDSCHNEIDER, Dieter. Naturphilosophie, in: Faszination Philosophie. Buechner Verlag: Bamberg, 2009.

Publicado

03/01/2024

Como Citar

We have never been Latourians! : religious pluralism & new materialism in Bruno Latour’s ‘Terrarism’. Logeion: Filosofia da Informação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, v. 10, n. 2, p. e-6884, 2024. DOI: 10.21728/logeion.2024v10n2e-6884. Disponível em: https://revista.ibict.br/fiinf/article/view/6884.. Acesso em: 18 maio. 2024.