Tacit knowledge and a multi-method approach in Asset Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2022v8n2.p197-212Palabras clave:
Tacit knowledge, Qualitative and quantitative data, Elicitation, Asset management, Decision makingResumen
This paper has two main objectives. The first one is to reflect on the validity of data in analysis and projections that underpin the engineering asset management of organizations, considering, on the one hand, a certain resistance or even inadequate use of data and information of a subjective nature and; on the other hand, a consolidated reliance on quantitative approaches and decisions based on data series. The second objective is to contextualize the applicability of combining qualitative data based on experts’ experience and on the tacit knowledge built in organizations, with approaches based essentially on quantitative data, according to the data availability and the decision scenario over the asset life cycle. We present two application of an approach combining quali and quanti data. One example interrelates Statistics with Psychology and the other combines elicitated data about asset indicators with parameters deterministically calculated. Both applications aiming at providing more realistic indicators and supporting the Asset Management process to make more assertive decisions.
Descargas
Referencias
ALIZADEH, P. Elicitation and planning in Markov decision processes with unknown rewards. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727695
ALVES, A. M.; HOLANDA, G. M. “Liquid” Methodologies: combining approaches and methods in ICT public policy evaluations. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas e Internacionais, v. 1, n. 2, p. 70–90, 2016.
BACHELARD, G. A filosofia do não; O novo espírito científico; A poética do espaço. Seleção de textos de José Américo Motta Pessanha; Traduçãos de Joaquim José Moura Ramos et al. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1978. (Os Pensadores). Inclui vida e obra de Bachelard.
BIKEL, J. E.; BRATVOLD, R. B. From uncertainty quantification to decision making in the Oil and Gas industry. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, v. 26, n. 5, p. 311-325, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/014459808787945344
BOURDIEU, P. Les trois états du capital culturel. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, v. 30, p. 3-6, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1979.2654
CAMPOS, J.; SHARMA, P.; JANTUNEN, E.; BAGLEE, D.; FUMAGALLI, L. Business performance measurements in Asset Management with the support of big data technologies. Management Systems in Production Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 143-149, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2017-0021
CARDOSO, M. A.; SILVA, M. S.; COELHO, S. T.; ALMEIDA, M. C.; COVAS, D. I. C. Urban water infrastructure asset management – a structured approach in four water utilities. Water Science & Technology, v. 66, n. 12, p. 2702-2711, 2012. Doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.509
CICHY, C.; RASS, S. An Overview of Data Quality Frameworks. IEEE Access, v. 7, p. 24634-24648, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899751
DUNTEMAN, G.H. Principal Components Analysis. SAGE University Paper, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985475
GALAR, D.; BERGES, L.; SANDBORN, P.; KUMAR, U. The need for aggregated indicators in performance asset management. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc: Maintenance and Reliability, v. 16, n.1, p. 120-127, 2014.
GUBA, E. G.; LINCOLN, Y. S. Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry. Educational Communications and Technology Journal (ECTJ), v. 30, p. 233-252, 1982. Doi: 10.1007/BF02765185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
HAUSCHILD, M. Z.; ROSENBAUM, R. K.; OLSEN, S. I. (eds.). Life Cycle Assessment – Theory and Practice. Springer, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3
HESSAMI, A. A Risk and Performance-based Infrastructure Asset Management Framework. 2015. Doctoral dissertation (Doctor of Philosophy) – Texas A & M University, Texas, 2015.
HICKEY, A. M.; DAVIS, A. M. Elicitation technique selection: How do experts do it? IEEE INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONF., 11 TH., 2003. Proceedings [...]. Monterey Bay, California, USA
HOLANDA, G. M.; ADORNI, C. Y.; MARSOLA, V. J.; PARREIRAS, F. S.; SARAIVA, T. F., GODOY NETO, O.; AZEVEDO, C. Aggregating Value in Asset Management: An Approach for Electric Generation and Transmission Utility. BRAZILIAN TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM, 5TH., 2019. Proceedings [...]. Campinas, Brazil. (BTSym19).
HOMER, M. Unlocking the value of asset data. Assets: The Institute of Asset Management magazine, August, p. 10-11, 2018.
JANSEN, B. J.; SALMINEN, J. O.; JUNG, S. G. Data-driven personas for enhanced user understanding: Combining empathy with rationality for better insights to analytics. Data and Information Management, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0005
JOHANSSON, L. G. Philosophy of science for scientists. Springer, 2016. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26551-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26551-3
KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin, 2011.
KAUFMANN, M. Big Data Management Canvas: A Reference Model for Value Creation from Data. Big Data Cogn Comput, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2019. Doi: 10.3390/bdcc3010019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3010019
LATOUR, B. Cogitamus: seis cartas sobre as humanidades científicas. Tradução de Jamille Pinheiro Dias. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2016. Tradução de: Cogitamus: six letres sur les humanités scientifiques. La Découverte, 2010.
MORIN, E. O Método 3: o conhecimento do conhecimento. Sulina, 2004.
NIETO, D.; AMATTI, J. C.; MOMBELLO, E. Review of Asset Management in distribution systems of electric energy – implications in the National context and Latin America. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION. 24TH., 2017. Proceedings [...]. Glasgow, 12-15 June 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/oap-cired.2017.0667
OGUSHI, C. M.; GEROLAMO, G. P.; MENEZES, E.; HOLANDA, G. M. A economia comportamental e a adoção de uma inovação tecnológica no cenário de telecomunicações. Simpósio de Gestão da Inovação Tecnológica. 23., 2004. Proceedings [...]. Cutiriba, 2004. p. 2350-2365.
O’LEARY, D. E. Enterprise Knowledge Management. IEEE Computer, v. 31, n. 3, p. 54-61, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/2.660190
OPPENHEIMER, M.; LITTLE, C. M.; COOKE, R. M. Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nature Climate Change, v. 6, p. 445-451, 2016. Doi: 0.1038/NCLIMATE2959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2959
POLANYI, M. The study of man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1959.
RHODES, K. M.; SAVOVIC, J.; ELBERS, R.; JONES, H. E.; HIGGINS, J. P. T.; STERNE, J. A. C.; WELTON, N.J.; TURNER, R. M. Adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis: combining data-based evidence on bias with detailed trial assessment. J Royal Statistical Society, v. 183, Part 1, p. 193-209, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12485
ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. Fourth Edition, The Free Press, 1995.
STENGERS, I.; PRIGOGINE, I. La nouvelle alliance: Métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard, 1979.
TABER, K. S. The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Educ., v. 48, p. 1273-1296, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
TER BERG, C. J.; LEONTARIS, M.; VAN DEN BOOMEN, M.; SPAAN, M. T. J.; WOLFERT, A. R. M. Expert judgement based maintenance decision support method for structures with a long service-life. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, v. 15, n. 4, p. 492-503, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1558270
TVERSKY, A.; KAHNEMAN, D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, v. 185, p. 1124-1131, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
WATSON, D.S.; FLORIDI, L. The explanation game: a formal framework for interpretable machine learning. Synthese, v. 198, p. 9211–9242, 2020. Doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02629-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02629-9
WHITTEMORE, R.; CHASE, S. K.; MANDLE, C. L. Validity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, v. 11, n. 4, p. 522-537, 2001. Doi: 10.1177/104973201129119299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Logeion: Filosofia da Informação
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
A revista é publicada sob a licença Creative Commons - Atribuição - Uso Não Comercial - Partilha nos Mesmos Termos 4.0 Internacional.
O trabalho publicado é considerado colaboração e, portanto, o autor não receberá qualquer remuneração para tal, bem como nada lhe será cobrado em troca para a publicação.
Os textos são de responsabilidade de seus autores.
É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial dos textos da revista, desde que citada a fonte.
