O PROTAGONISMO DO ECOSSISTEMA CATARINENSE DE INOVAÇÃO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2023v10n1.p101-126Palavras-chave:
empreendedorismo, Habitats de Inovação, Conexão, Inovação, Santa CatarinaResumo
A presente pesquisa teve como objetivo analisar o ecossistema de inovação do estado de Santa Catarina, a partir do confronto da literatura científica e dos resultados da pesquisa empírica. Na metodologia qualitativa, buscou-se um protocolo de estudo de caso, a partir de uma amostra não probabilística por cotas. Como fontes de evidências foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas, observação não participante, análise de documentos, registro em arquivos e artefatos físicos. Para o embasamento teórico, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática do conceito, atores e casos de ecossistema de inovação a partir da análise de publicações na base de dados da Web of Science. Como técnica de pesquisa, utilizou-se a análise de conteúdo com o auxílio do software Nvivo 12 licenciado para analisar todo o conteúdo investigado. Observa-se que Santa Catarina tem um ecossistema de inovação maduro e pulverizado entre os seus 295 municípios. É um ambiente com intenso desenvolvimento de inovação e tecnologia, onde despontam atores, tais como, a Associação Catarinense de Tecnologia (ACATE), o Sistema S, a Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), o Parque Sapiens, o Governo de Santa Catarina e outros atores de inovação espalhados por vários municípios. A conexão do ecossistema de Santa Catarina, está muito atrelada aos seus 13 polos de inovação, que são responsáveis por interligar as diversas regiões geográficas.
Palavras-chave: Empreendedorismo. Habitats de Inovação. Conexão. Inovação. Santa Catarina.
Downloads
Referências
ADNER, R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, v. 84, n.4, p.98-107, 2006.
ADNER, R.; KAPOOR, R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, n. 3, p. 306–333, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
ALLAHAR, H.; BRATHWAITE, C. Business incubation as an instrument of innovation: the experience of South America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Innovation, v. 4, n. 2, p. 71-85, Jul-Dec, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v4i2.107
ANDERSEN, J. What are innovation ecosystems and how to build and use them. 2011. Acesso no dia 17 de Janeiro de 2017: https://innovationmanagement.se/2011/05/16/what-are-innovation-ecosystems-and-how-to-build-and-use-them/
AUDRETSCH, D. et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 2, p. 313-325, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4
AUDY, J.; PIQUÉ, J. Dos parques científicos e tecnológicos aos ecossistemas de inovação. Desenvolvimento social e econômico na sociedade do conhecimento. ANPROTEC – Tendências. Brasília, DF: ANPROTEC, 2016.
AZEVEDO, I.; FARD, B.; TEIXEIRA, C. FLORIANÓPOLIS: Uma análise evolutiva do desenvolvimento inovador da cidade a partir do seu ecossistema de inovação. Revista Eletrônica do Alto Vale do Itajaí, v. 6, p. 108-120, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5965/2316419006092017108
BAHRAMI, H; EVANS, S. Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship. California Management Review, v. 37, p. 62-89, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165799
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. 6. ed. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D. ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management. v. 46, nº. 3-4, p. 201-234, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
CARAYANNIS, E.; BARTH, T.; CAMPBELL, D. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. v. 1. 2, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
CHRISTENSEN, C. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1997.
CHRISTENSEN, M.; RAYNOR, M.; MCDONALD, R. What is Disruptive Innovation? 2015. Acesso em 22/02/2017: https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation
CHRISTENSEN, C; OVERDORF, M. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, (March–April), p. 66-76, 2000.
COLOMBELLI, A.; PAOLUCCI, E.; UGHETTO, E. Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Small Business Economics, p.505-521, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4
CUKIER, D.; KON, F.; LYONS, T. S. Software Startup Ecosystems Evolution: The New York City Case Study. 2nd International Workshop on Software Startups, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC39735.2016.9026150
CUSUMANO, M.; GAWER, A. The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 43, nº 3, p.51, 2002.
DEL VECCHIO, P.E.; NDOU, V.; SECUNDO, G.; SPECCHIA, F. Living Lab as an Approach to Activate Dynamic Innovation Ecosystems and Networks: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, v.14(05), 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500249
DURST, S.; POUTANEN, P. Success factors of innovation ecosystems – Initial insights from a literature review. Aalto University Publication, p. 27-38, 2013.
EDQUIST, C.; HOMMEN, L. Small country innovation systems: globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 544, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847209993
ETZKOWITZ, H. The triple helix: Academic-industry-government relations - Implications for the New York regional innovation environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. v. 787, p. 67-86, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb44849.x
ETZKOWITZ, H. Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon: An introduction to the Special Issue: Silicon Valley: Global model or unique anomaly/Numéro special: La Silicon Valley: Modèle global ou anomalie singulière, Social Science Information, 52 (4), p. 515-538, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413501946
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, v. 14, p. 14–19, 1995.
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. (Conference Report), Science & Public Policy, Vol. 25(3), p. 195-203,1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy v.29, p. 109-123, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
FAN, P.; WAN, G.; LU, M. China’s Regional Inequality in Innovation Capability. China & World Economy, v. 20, n. 3, pp. 16-36, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2012.01285.x
FERRETTI, M.; PARMENTOLA, A. Technological learning and innovation systems in developing countries: the example of Dubai. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 37-59, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTE.2015.067100
FLICK, U. Introdução à Pesquisa Qualitativa. Tradução Joice Elias Costa. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.
GOBBLE, M. Charting the innovation ecosystem. Research-Technology Management, v.57(4), p.55-59, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5705005
GUNDAY, G.; ULUSOY, G.; KILIÇ, K.; ALPKAN, L. Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 133 (2), p.662-676, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
HWANG, V. W.; HOROWITT, G. The Rainforest - the secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Los Altos Hills: Regenwald, 2012.
IANSISTI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2004.
IANSITI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 68-81, 2004a.
IANSITI, M., LEVIEN, R. The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business Press. 2004b.
ISENBERG, D. J. Applying the Ecosystem Metaphor to Entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, v. 61(4), p. 564–573, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X16676162
JISHNU, V.; GILHOTRA, R. M.; MISHRA, D. N. Pharmacy education in India: Strategies for a better future. Journal of Young Pharmacists, v. 3, n. 4, p. 334-342, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.90248
KNEBEL, P.; PIRES, S.; AUDY, Jorge Luis Nicolas. A aventura da transformação. 1. ed. Porto Alegre: Anprotec, p. 232, 2017.
KOBZEVA, L.; GRIBOV, E.; KUZNETSOV, I. Creating a Web Infrastructure of the Regional Innovation Ecosystem in the Triple Helix Model in Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 52, p. 72–79, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.443
KORTELAINEN, S.; JÄRVI, K. Ecosystems: systematic literature review and framework development. In: XXV ISPIM Conference – Innovation for Sustainable Economy & Society. Dublin, Ireland, jun, 2014.
KURATKO, D. F. Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, & practice. Mason: Cengage Learning. p. 624, 2017.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, A PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN NANO-ELECTRONICS. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.51
MARCHI, V. GRANDINETTI, R. Regional Innovation Systems Or Innovative Regions? Evidence from Italy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2015.
MARKKULA, M.; KUNE, H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 7-15, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/932
MEOLI, M.; PALEARI, S.; VISMARA, S. The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin off. Small Business Economics. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9956-5
MOORE, J. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. 71, n. 2, May-June, p. 75-86, 1993.
MOORE, J. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperBusiness, 1996.
MOORE, J. Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. Antitrust Bulletin; v. 51(1), ABI/INFORM Global. p. 31- 75, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0605100103
NAPIER, G; HANSEN, C. Ecosystems for Young Scalable Firms. Copenhagen: FORA. Group. 2011.
NIETH, L. et al. Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes. European Planning Studies, v. 26, n. 11, p. 2147–2166, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1530144
O'CONNOR, G. Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach. Journal Of Product Innovation Management, v. 25, n. 4, p.313-330, jul. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x
OECD/Eurostat. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg, 2018.
OH, D. S.; PHILLIPS, F.; PARK, S.; LEE, E. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, p. 1–6, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
PELTONIEMI, M. Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Émerg.: Complex. Organ. v. 8, n. 1, p. 10–19, 2006.
PORTER, M. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
POUPART, J. et al. A Pesquisa Qualitativa: enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos. 4. ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2014.
RADICIC, D.; PUGH, G.; DOUGLAS, D. Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, v. 54, n. 1, p. 257-283, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0088-3
RAJAHONKA, M. et al. Orchestrators of Innovation-Driven Regional Development: Experiences from the INNOFOCUS Project and Change 2020 Programmed. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 52-62, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/937
RANGA, M.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, IP Publishing Ltd, v. 27, n. 4, p. 237–262, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
REYNOLDS, E.; UYGUN, Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 178–191, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.003
RITALA, P., ALMPANOPOULOU, A. In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, v. 60, p. 39- 42, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.004
SÁBATO, J.; BOTANA, N. La ciência y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración. Buenos Aires, n. 3, p. 15-36, nov., 1968.
SANTA CATARINA, Secretaria de Estado de Desenvolvimento Econômico Sustentável. Guia de Implantação dos Centros de Inovação: Livro II - Plano de Implantação / Secretaria de Estado de Desenvolvimento Econômico Sustentável. - Florianópolis: SDS, 2017.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New York, p. 385, 1939.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. p. 381, 1942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2226398
SPIGEL, B. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
STAKE, R. Pesquisa Qualitativa: estudando como as coisas funcionam. Tradução de Karla Reis. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2011.
UBREZIOVA, I. et al. Innovation ecosystems for the moldovan small and medium-sized enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, v.10(2), p. 298-312, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.2-22
VALKOKARI, K. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, v.5(8), 17–24, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/919
VARGO, S. L.; LUSCH, R. F. From repeat patronage to value co-creation in service ecosystems: A transcending conceptualization of relationship. Journal of Business Market Management, v.4(4), p.169–179, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0046-0
VIITANEN, J. Profiling Regional Innovation Ecosystems as Functional Collaborative Systems: The Case of Cambridge. Technology Innovation Management Review, v.6(12), p. 6-25, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1038
XU, G. et al. Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 208-221, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030
YIN, R. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p. 282, 2014.
YIN, R. Case Study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p. 352, 2017.
YOGUEL, G.; BORELLO, J.; ERBES, A. Argentina: how to study and act upon local innovation systems. Cepal Review, n. 99, p. 63-80, dez., 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/154ac43f-en
ZHANG, W.; LIU, P. F.; ZHANG, J. K. Multi-Group Symbiotic Evolution Mechanism in an Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from China. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, v. 66, p. 249-277, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.66.15
Publicado
Como citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Matheus Pereira Mattos Felizola, Iracema Machado de Aragão, Amanda Luiza Soares Silva
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista é publicada sob a licença Creative Commons - Atribuição - Uso Não Comercial - Partilha nos Mesmos Termos 4.0 Internacional.
O trabalho publicado é considerado colaboração e, portanto, o autor não receberá qualquer remuneração para tal, bem como nada lhe será cobrado em troca para a publicação.
Os textos são de responsabilidade de seus autores.
É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial dos textos da revista, desde que citada a fonte.