Colaboração aberta para a solução de problemas sociais

normas de autoridade de governança convergentes ou divergentes?

Autores

  • Robin Mansell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v10i2.750

Palavras-chave:

Ciência Aberta, Crowdsourcing, Informação Digital, Big Data. Governança, Autoridade, Curadoria.

Resumo

Este trabalho examina o potencial para colaboração entre profissionais da ciência formal e grupos frouxamente conectados online que empregam crowdsourcing para gerar recursos de informação digital.  Quais são as diferenças entre os modos preferidos de governar a criação do conhecimento de cientistas e de outros grupos online? Faz-se uma distinção entre modos de governança constituídos e adaptativos, e as similaridades e diferenças entre o entendimento dos dois grupos a respeito da curadoria, verificação e abertura da informação são consideradas.  Sugere-se que a ciência aberta precisará tornar-se mais flexível, se for para construir colaborações com grupos frouxamente conectados em termos equitativos, respeitando seus respectivos valores e de modos que maximizem suas contribuições para a solução de problemas sociais.

 

Referências

BENKLER, Y. Commons-Based Strategies and the Problems of Patents. Science, v. 305, n. 5687, p. 1110-1111, 2004.

BOYD, D. M.; CRAWFORD, K. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication and Society, v. 15, n. 5, p. 662-679, 2012.

BOYLE, J. The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 2008.

CALLON, M. The increasing involvement of concerned groups in R&D policies: what lessons for public powers? In: A. GEUNA, A. J. SALTER; W. E. STEINMUELLER (Ed.). Science and innovation: rethinking the rationales for funding and governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003, p. 30-68.

CALLON, M.; RABEHARISOA, V. Research "in the wild" and the shaping of social identities. Technology in Society, v. 25, n. 2, p. 193-204, 2003.

CODATA. International Training Workshop for Developing Countries on Scientific Data Management and Sustainable Development, Codata (International Council for Science: Committee on Data for Science and Technology) of Work. Computer Network Information Center, 16-31 July, Beijing.

DASGUPTA, P. ; DAVID, P. A. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, v. 23, n.5, n. 487-521.

DAVID, P. A., DEN BESTEN, M., SCHROEDER, R. Will E-Science be open science? In: DUTTON , W. H.; JEFFREYS , P. W. (Ed.). World wide research: reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2010, p. 299-316.

DIGITAL CURATION CENTRE. 2012. Available at: http://www.dcc.ac.uk. Access: 18 Aug. 2014.

DUTTON, W. H.; JEFFREYS, P. W. (Ed.). (2010). World wide research: reshaping the sciences and humanities. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2010.

HAKLAY, M. Classification of citizen science activities of work. Available at: http://povesham.wordpress.com/2011/07/20/classification-of-citizen-science-activities/. Access: 18 Aug. 2014.

HESS, C.; OSTROM, E. (Ed.). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2007.

HOWE, J. Crowdsourcing: why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Crown Business, 2008.

JENKINS, H. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006.

KUHN, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

KUHN, T. S. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview, Edited by James Conant and John Haugeland. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

LÉVY, P. Collective intelligence: mankind's emerging world in cyberspace, Trans. R. Bononno. New York: Helix Books - Perseus Books, 1997.

MANSELL, R. Employing crowdsourced information resources: managing the information commons. International Journal of the Commons, v. 7, n. 2, p.255-277, 2013.

MATEOS GARCIA, J.; STEINMUELLER, W. E. Open, but How Much?: Growth, Conflict, and Instititional Evolution in Open Source Communities. In: AMIN, A.; ROBERTS J. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 254-281.

MOKYR, J. The gifts of Athena. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.

OSTROM, E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

ROYAL SOCIETY. Science as an open enterprise of work. London: The Royal Society, 2012.

SHIRKY, C. Cognitive surplus: creativity and generosity in a connected age. New York: Allen Lane, 2010.

SILVERTOWN, J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, v. 24, n. 9, p. 467-471, 2009.

STODDEN, V. Open science: policy implications for the evolving phenomenon of user-led scientific innovation. Journal of Science Communication, v. 9, n. 1, p, 1-8, 2010.

SUROWIECKI, J. The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations New York: Doubleday, 2004.

WIGGINS, A.; CROWSTON, K. Goals and tasks: two typologies of citizen science projects. In: HCSS (Ed.). ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCE, 45. Proceedings … p. 3426-3435. HI: School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, 2012.

Downloads

Publicado

05/12/2014

Edição

v. 10 n. 2 (2014): Desafios contemporâneos à produção colaborativa em ciência, tecnologia e inovação

Seção

Desafios contemporâneos à produção colaborativa em CT&I

Licença

Copyright (c) 2025 Robin Mansell

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.