The importance of knowledge and S&T for the consolidation of institutions and democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v8i1.477Keywords:
Science & Technology, Institutional Development, Democracy, MercosulAbstract
By assuming the interconnection that exists between knowledge and culture it is possible to say that science and technology are not above the national societies and their cultural specificities, even when globalization produces, persistently, global and transnational spaces that are provided with common factors and values that inform knowledge. The relationship between knowledge and national communities expresses the wills and strategies of people and countries to conduct their own development and to place themselves within the boundaries of recognition and power. Besides national initiatives, countries pursue democracy and development by combining interests and competence that make it possible to integrate different national communities in the production of knowledge and science as well as to expand the territories throughout they develop. This takes place in different scales – from the local to the national, the sub-regional to the transnational. Expertise, knowledge communities and state and private agents draw the paths of knowledge. Throughout cultural veins and distinct political history countries faces conflicts and tensions at the national or supranational levels; nevertheless, culture and history permit the growth of collective action supported by negotiation, consensus and cooperation. The aim of this paper is to understand the possibilities for cooperation to the development of knowledge in a globalized world that is also structured into political regional blocs. The cooperation we focus on is between countries of Mercosul, the South Common Market of Latin America.
References
BARTELSON, J. Three concepts of globalization. International Sociology, v. 15, n. 2, June 2000.
BAUMGARTEN, Maíra. Avaliação e gestão de ciência e tecnologia: estado e coletividade científica. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, n. 70, dez. 2004.
BOTTO, Mercedes. Los think thanks em lãs negociaciones comeciales externas?: aconsejan, median o legitiman intereses?: um análisis comparado del Cono Sur. In: . Saber y política em América Latina: el uso del conocimiento em lãs negociaciones comerciales internacionales. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros, 2007.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: UNESP, 2004.
CALHOUN, Craig. Constitutional patriotism and the public sphere: interests, identity and solidarity in the integration of Europe. In: GREFF, P.; CIARAN, C. (Ed.). Global justice and transitional politics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
CHAMPANGHE, Patrick. Prefácio. In: BOURDIEU, Pierre. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: UNESP, 2004.
DOMINGUES, José Maurício. A America Latina e a modernidade contemporânea. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2009.
DOSSIÊ América Latina.Caderno CRH, v. 21, n. 53, Maio/Ago. 2008.
FRASER, Nancy. Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: CALHOUN, G. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992.
_____. Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, n. 3, May/June 2000.
_____. Social justice in the knowledge kociety: redistribution, recognition, and participation. In: BEITRAG ZUM KONGRESS, 5., 2001, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. Proceedings... [S.l.: s.n.], 2001.
GUADILLA, Carmen García. Balance de la década de los 90 y reflexiones sobre las nuevas fuerzas de cambio en la educación superior. In: MOLLIS, M. (Comp.). Las universidades en América Latina: ¿reformadas o alteradas?: la cosmética del poder financiero. Buenos Aires, CLACSO, 2003.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Conhecimento e interesse. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1982.
. Ciencia y técnica como “ideología”. Madrid: Tecnos, 1986.
HASS, Peter M. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination.
International Organization, v. 46, n. 1, 1992.
HESS, David J. Science and technology in a multicultural world: the cultural politics of facts and artifacts. NewYork: Columbia University Press, 1995.
HOFFMANN, A. R.; COUTINHO, M.; KFURI, R. Indicadores e análise multidimensional do processo de integração do Cone Sul. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 51, n. 2, 2008.
LÓPEZ SEGRERA, Francisco El impacto de la globalización de las políticas educativas en los sistemas de educación superior de América Latina y el Caribe. In: MOLLIS, M. (Comp.). Las universidades en América Latina: ¿reformadas o alteradas?: la cosmética del poder financiero. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2003.
MACIEL, Maria Lúcia. Ciência, tecnologia e inovação: idéias sobre o papel das ciências sociais no desenvolvimento. Parcerias Estratégicas, n. 21, dez. 2005.
_____. Ciência, tecnologia e inovação: a relação entre conhecimento e desenvolvimento.
BIB: revista brasileira de informação bibliográfica em ciências sociais, n. 54, 2002.
_____. Hélices, sistemas, ambientes e modelos: os desafios à sociologia da inovação.
Sociologias, ano 3, n. 6, 2001.
MARX, Karl . El Capital. Espanha: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2002. Tomo I.
_____. Contribuição à crítica da economia política. São Paulo: Expressão Popular, 2008. MOLLIS, Marcela. Presentación. In: . Las universidades en América Latina:
¿reformadas o alteradas?: la cosmética del poder financiero. Buenos Aires, CLACSO, 2003. ORTIZ, Renato. Mundialização e cultura. São Paulo: Braziliense, 1994.
POGGE, Thomas. Creating supra-national institutions democratically: reflections on the European Union's ”democratic deficit''. The Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 5, n. 2, 1997.
_____. Human rights and human responsibilities. In: DE GREIFF, Pablo; CRONIN, Ciaran. Global justice and transitional politics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
ROUANET, Sérgio Paulo; FREITAG, Bárbara. Habermas: sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 1980. SAINT-GEOURS, Yves. L”Amérique latine dans la géopolitique mondiale. Pouvoirs: L’Amérique latine, n. 98, 2001.
SBERRO, Stephan. L’intégration régionale en Amérique latine: le mythe de Sysiphe. Pouvoirs:
L’Amérique latine, n. 98, 2001.
SCHNAPPER, Dominique. Qu’est-ce que l’intégration?. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 2007.
SERBIN, Andrés. Multipolarité, leaderships et institutions régionales: les défis de l’UNASUR face à la prévention des crises régionales. In: VAGNOUX, I.; EEUWEN, D. van. Les relations interaméricaines en perspective: entre crises et alliances. Paris: Editions IHEAL, 2009.
SOSA, Alberto J. El Mercosur político: orígenes, evolución y perspectivas. Disponível em:
. Acesso em: mar. 2008.
SOUSA, J; GERALDES, E. As contribuições de Karl Marx e Max Weber sobre a autonomia/não-autonomia da ciência e tecnologia. Ciências & Cognição, v. 13, n. 1, 2008.
THERBORN, G. Globalizations: dimensions, historical waves, regional effects, normative governance. International Sociology, v. 15, n. 2, June 2000.
TRIGUEIRO, Michelangelo Giotto Santoro. O debate sobre a autonomia/não-autonomia da tecnologia na sociedade. Sociologias, ano 11, n. 22, 2009.
VELHO, Léa. Políticas governamentais e motivações para aproximar pesquisa acadêmica e setor produtivo. In: VELOSO, Jacques (Org.). O ensino superior e o Mercosul. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Garamond, 1998.
_____. Redes regionais de cooperação em C&T e o MERCOSUL. Parcerias Estratégicas, n. 10, mar. 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruthy Nadia Laniado, Rubenilda Sodré dos Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant Liinc em Revista the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their manuscripts and versios of record (VoR) in their personal web pages or institutional repositories, generic repositories etc., before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication in Liinc em Revista, according to its open access depositing policy registered in the Directory of Editorial Policies of Brazilian Journals (DIADORIM), kindly providing a link to the article published on Liinc's website.
Liinc em Revista, published by Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – CC BY 4.0