RECURSOS INFOCOMUNICACIONAIS PARA APRENDIZAGEM ORGANIZACIONAL
uma revisão crítica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2024v10n2e-6676Palavras-chave:
Aprendizagem Organizacional, Informação, Conhecimento, Memória OrganizacionalResumo
Este artigo propõe avançar na promoção da aprendizagem organizacional por meio da integração dos processos e recursos dentro do ambiente organizacional. Para isso, é necessário considerar tanto as características intrínsecas de aprendizagem do ser humano, bem como as informações, conhecimentos, aspectos sociais e quanto aos processos e fatores organizacionais que influenciam na aprendizagem, como a prática dialógica reflexiva, liderança e memória organizacional. Com objetivo de verificar a evolução da literatura de aprendizagem com a utilização e reutilização dos recursos da empresa como todas as capacidades, processuais e atributos sociais, que constituem ativos tangíveis e intangíveis. Seguindo os passos de uma revisão crítica da literatura proposta por (Wright and Michailova, 2022) utilizando fontes de evidências, reunindo e fornecendo informações ricas para provocações construtivas. Por fim, apresentamos uma proposta teórico-metodológica de aprendizagem infocomunicacional a ser aprofundada, como fator valioso nas organizações que devem ser pensadas em sua totalidade, pois são recursos relevantes por serem características inerentes ao ser humano e às estruturas organizacionais.
Downloads
Referências
AKTOUF, Omar. Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism?. Academy of management review, v. 17, n. 3, p. 407-431, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4281975
ADAMSKA, Krystyna et al. Gender perspectives on self‐censorship in organizations: The role of management position, procedural justice and organizational climate. European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 52, n. 3, p. 570-583, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2838
ADLER, Paul S.; KWON, Seok-Woo. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, v. 27, n. 1, p. 17-40, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
ADORISIO, Anna Linda Musacchio. Organizational remembering as narrative:‘Storying’the past in banking. Organization, v. 21, n. 4, p. 463-476, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414527248
ALVESSON, Mats. Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. OUP Oxford, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199259342.001.0001
ALVESSON, Mats; WILLMOTT, Hugh. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of management review, v. 17, n. 3, p. 432-464, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4281977
ALVESSON, Mats; LEE ASHCRAFT, Karen; THOMAS, Robyn. Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, v. 15, n. 1, p. 5-28, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084426
AMABILE, Teresa M. et al. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, v. 10, n. 1, p. 123-167, 1988.
ANAND, Vikas; MANZ, Charles C.; GLICK, William H. An organizational memory approach to information management. Academy of management review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 796-809, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255639
ANTHONY, Callen. When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1173-1212, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211016755
ANTUNES, Helder de Jesus Ginja; PINHEIRO, Paulo Goncalves. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v. 5, n. 2, p. 140-149, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002
ARGOTE, Linda; LEE, Sunkee; PARK, Jisoo. Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Science, v. 67, n. 9, p. 5399-5429, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693
ARGYRIS, Ch; SCHÖN, Donald A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, n. 77/78, p. 345-348, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40183951
AUSUBEL, David Paul. The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science & Business Media, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7
BANDURA, Albert; WALTERS, Richard H. Social learning theory. Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs, 1977.
BARNEY, Jay B. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, v. 27, n. 6, p. 643-650, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00115-5
BARTEL, Caroline A.; GARUD, Raghu. The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization science, v. 20, n. 1, p. 107-117, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0372
BESNIER, Niko. Language and affect. Annual review of anthropology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 419-451, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223
BOOTH, Charles et al. Accounting for the dark side of corporate history: Organizational culture perspectives and the Bertelsmann case. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, v. 18, n. 6, p. 625-644, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.03.012
BROWN, John Seely; DUGUID, Paul. Organizing knowledge. California management review, v. 40, n. 3, p. 90-111, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165945
BROWN, John Seely; DUGUID, Paul. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization science, v. 12, n. 2, p. 198-213, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
BROWN, John Seely; DUGUID, Paul. Local knowledge: Innovation in the networked age. Management Learning, v. 33, n. 4, p. 427-437, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602334002
BROWN, John Seely; DUGUID, Paul. The social life of information: Updated, with a new preface. Harvard Business Review Press, 2017.
BROWN, Andrew D.; STARKEY, Ken. The effect of organizational culture on communication and information. Journal of Management studies, v. 31, n. 6, p. 807-828, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00640.x
BROWN, Michael E.; TREVIÑO, Linda K.; HARRISON, David A. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, v. 97, n. 2, p. 117-134, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
BRUMMANS, B. H. J. M. et al. Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods, p. 173-194, 2014.
CALTON, Jerry M.; PAYNE, Steven L. Coping with paradox: Multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business & Society, v. 42, n. 1, p. 7-42, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302250505
CARLILE, Paul R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization science, v. 15, n. 5, p. 555-568, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
CARLILE, Paul R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization science, v. 13, n. 4, p. 442-455, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
CASEY, Andrea J.; OLIVERA, Fernando. Reflections on organizational memory and forgetting. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20, n. 3, p. 305-310, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611408264
CASTELLS, M. The Rise of The Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. John Wiley & Sons. 2010.
CATINO, Maurizio; PATRIOTTA, Gerardo. Learning from errors: Cognition, emotions and safety culture in the Italian air force. Organization studies, v. 34, n. 4, p. 437-467, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467156
CHANDLER, Alfred Dupont; HIKINO, Takashi; CHANDLER, Alfred D. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Harvard University Press, 2009.
CHANLAT, Jean-François. L'individu dans l'organisation: les dimensions oubliées. Presses Université Laval, 1990.
CHEN, Chen et al. The effect of leader knowledge hiding on employee voice behavior—the role of leader-member exchange and knowledge distance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, v. 8, n. 04, p. 69, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.84006
CHIA, Robert. Discourse analysis organizational analysis. Organization, v. 7, n. 3, p. 513-518, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840073009
CHIU, Chao-Min; HSU, Meng-Hsiang; WANG, Eric TG. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, v. 42, n. 3, p. 1872-1888, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
CHOO, Chun Wei. Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment. Information Today, Inc., 2002.
CHOO, Chun Wei. The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions. International journal of information management, v. 16, n. 5, p. 329-340, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-4012(96)00020-5
CHRISTIANSON, Marlys K. et al. Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organization science, v. 20, n. 5, p. 846-860, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0389
CLAVER, Enrique et al. The performance of information systems through organizational culture. Information Technology & People, v. 14, n. 3, p. 247-260, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840110402149
COHEN, Wesley M.; LEVINTHAL, Daniel A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, p. 128-152, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
COOREN, François et al. Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization studies, v. 32, n. 9, p. 1149-1170, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410836
CROSSAN, Mary M.; APAYDIN, Marina. A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, v. 47, n. 6, p. 1154-1191, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
CROSSAN, Mary M.; LANE, Henry W.; WHITE, Roderick E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of management review, v. 24, n. 3, p. 522-537, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135
CUNLIFFE, Ann L. Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management learning, v. 33, n. 1, p. 35-61, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602331002
CUNLIFFE, Ann L. The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management learning, v. 40, n. 1, p. 87-101, 2009.
CUNLIFFE, Ann; SADLER-SMITH, Eugene. Cottage industries, critique and scholarship. Management Learning, v. 45, n. 1, p. 3-5, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507613510827
CUNLIFFE, Ann L.; SCARATTI, Giuseppe. Embedding impact in engaged research: Developing socially useful knowledge through dialogical sensemaking. British Journal of Management, v. 28, n. 1, p. 29-44, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12204
CUNLIFFE, Ann L. Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human relations, v. 56, n. 8, p. 983-1003, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267030568004
CUNLIFFE, Ann L. “On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner” redux: What does it mean to be reflexive?. Journal of management education, v. 40, n. 6, p. 740-746, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916668919
CUNLIFFE, Ann L. Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management learning, v. 39, n. 2, p. 123-139, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607087578
CUNLIFFE, Ann L. The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management learning, v. 40, n. 1, p. 87-101, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608099315
CURRIE, Graeme; KNIGHTS, David. Reflecting on a critical pedagogy in MBA education. Management Learning, v. 34, n. 1, p. 27-49, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507603034001129
CURRY, Adrienne; MOORE, Caroline. Assessing information culture—an exploratory model. International journal of information management, v. 23, n. 2, p. 91-110, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00102-0
DAVENPORT, Thomas H.; PRUSAK, Laurence. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, 1998.
DIXON, Nancy M. Organizational learning: A review of the literature with implications for HRD professionals. Human Resource Development Quarterly, v. 3, n. 1, p. 29-49, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920030105
DUREPOS, Gabrielle; MILLS, Albert J. Actor-network theory, ANTi-history and critical organizational historiography. Organization, v. 19, n. 6, p. 703-721, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411420196
DUREPOS, Gabrielle; SHAFFNER, Ellen C.; TAYLOR, Scott. Developing critical organizational history: Context, practice and implications. Organization, v. 28, n. 3, p. 449-467, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419883381
EISENHARDT, Kathleen M. Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. Academy of Management Review, v. 25, n. 4, p. 703-705, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707694
EISENHARDT, Kathleen M.; MARTIN, Jeffrey A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, v. 21, n. 10‐11, p. 1105-1121, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
FAIRHURST, Gail T. Reframing the art of framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. Leadership, v. 1, n. 2, p. 165-185, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005051857
FAIRHURST, Gail T.; GRANT, David. The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management communication quarterly, v. 24, n. 2, p. 171-210, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909359697
FAIRHURST, Gail T. Discursive leadership: A communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly, v. 21, n. 4, p. 510-521, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907313714
FAIRHURST, Gail; SARR, Robert. The art of framing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
FELDMAN, Regina M.; FELDMAN, Steven P. What links the chain: An essay on organizational remembering as practice. Organization, v. 13, n. 6, p. 861-887, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406068500
FIOL, C. Marlene; LYLES, Marjorie A. Organizational learning. Academy of management review, v. 10, n. 4, p. 803-813, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279103
FIOL, C. Marlene. Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, v. 13, n. 6, p. 653-666, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.653.502
FOROUGHI, Hamid; AL-AMOUDI, Ismael. Collective forgetting in a changing organization: When memories become unusable and uprooted. Organization Studies, v. 41, n. 4, p. 449-470, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619830130
FOROUGHI, Hamid et al. Organizational memory studies. Organization Studies, v. 41, n. 12, p. 1725-1748, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620974338
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da liberdade: Ética, democracia e coragem cívica . Editores Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
FROHMANN, B. (2006). O caráter social, material e público da informação. In: FUJITA, Mariângela Spotti Lopes et al. A dimensão epistemológica da ciência da informação e suas interfaces técnicas, políticas e institucionais nos processos de produção, acesso e disseminação da informação. Editora Oficina Universitária, 2008. In. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36311/2008.978-85-98176-17-8.p19-34
GAGNE, Marylene. Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of applied sport psychology, v. 15, n. 4, p. 372-390, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714044203
GARUD, Raghu; DUNBAR, Roger LM; BARTEL, Caroline A. Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organization science, v. 22, n. 3, p. 587-601, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0536
GEERTZ, Clifford. The interpretation of cultures. Basic books, 1973.
GHOSHAL, Sumantra. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management learning & education, v. 4, n. 1, p. 75-91, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132558
GHOSHAL, Sumantra; MORAN, Peter. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of management Review, v. 21, n. 1, p. 13-47, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161563
GONG, Yaping et al. A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, v. 56, n. 3, p. 827-851, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0177
GRANT, David; HARDY, Cynthia. Introduction: Struggles with organizational discourse. Organization studies, v. 25, n. 1, p. 5-13, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604038173
GRANT, Robert M. Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, v. 17, n. S2, p. 109-122, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Teoria da ação comunicativa. Volume I e II. Madrid: Ed. 1984.
HUBER, George P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 88-115, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
ILHARCO, Fernando. Filosofia da Informação: uma introdução à informação como fundação da acção da comunicação e da decisão. 2003.
KALSHOVEN, Karianne; DEN HARTOG, Deanne N.; DE HOOGH, Annebel HB. Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The leadership quarterly, v. 22, n. 1, p. 51-69, 2011.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.007
KANE, Gerald C. et al. What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS quarterly, v. 38, n. 1, p. 275-304, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13
KANE, Gerald C. et al. Avoiding an oppressive future of machine learning: A design theory for emancipatory assistants. Mis Quarterly, v. 45, n. 1, p. 371-396, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/1578
KING, William R. Knowledge management and organizational learning. Springer US, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1
KHURANA, R. 20017. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830862
KONSTANTINOU, Efrosyni; FINCHAM, Robin. Not sharing but trading: Applying a Maussian exchange framework to knowledge management. Human Relations, v. 64, n. 6, p. 823-842, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710388676
KOGUT, Bruce; ZANDER, Udo. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, v. 3, n. 3, p. 383-397, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
KORNBERGER, Martin; CLEGG, Stewart R.; CARTER, Chris. Rethinking the polyphonic organization: Managing as discursive practice. Scandinavian journal of Management, v. 22, n. 1, p. 3-30, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2005.05.004
LEONARDI, Paul M. Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information systems research, v. 25, n. 4, p. 796-816, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536
LEVINTHAL, Daniel A.; MARCH, James G. The myopia of learning. Strategic management journal, v. 14, n. S2, p. 95-112, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
LEVITT, Barbara; MARCH, James G. Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 319-338, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
LIFSHITZ-ASSAF, Hila. Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Administrative science quarterly, v. 63, n. 4, p. 746-782, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217747876
LYNCH, Michael. Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, v. 17, n. 3, p. 26-54, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202
LOVELACE, Kathi J.; EGGERS, Fabian; DYCK, Loren R. I do and I understand: Assessing the utility of web-based management simulations to develop critical thinking skills. Academy of Management Learning & Education, v. 15, n. 1, p. 100-121, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0203
MARCH, James G.; SIMON, Herbert A. Organizations John Wiley & Sons. New York, 1958.
MARTINS, Ellen-Caroline; TERBLANCHE, Fransie. Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European journal of innovation management, v. 6, n. 1, p. 64-74, 2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337
MCPHEE, Robert D.; ZAUG, Pamela. The communicative constitution of organizations. Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication, v. 10, n. 1-2, p. 21, 2009.
NAHAPIET, Janine; GHOSHAL, Sumantra. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, v. 23, n. 2, p. 242-266, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
NICOLINI, Davide. Something old, something new and something puzzling: A commentary on the Schneider–Geiger and Schreyögg debate. Management Learning, v. 40, n. 4, p. 487-492, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339698
NONAKA, Ikujiro; TAKEUCHI, Hirotaka. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford university press, 2009.
NOVAK, Joseph D. Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Routledge, 2010.
OCASIO, William. Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, v. 18, n. S1, p. 187-206, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K
OSWICK, Cliff et al. A dialogic analysis of organizational learning. Journal of management studies, v. 37, n. 6, p. 887-902, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00209
PASSARELLI, Brasilina; SILVA, Armando Malheiro da; RAMOS, Fernando. E-infocomunicação: estratégias e aplicações. 2014.
PATRIOTTA, Gerardo. Sensemaking on the shop floor: Narratives of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, v. 40, n. 2, p. 349-375, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00343
PEARCE, Craig L. The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 18, n. 1, p. 47-57, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12690298
PFEFFER, Jeffrey; FONG, Christina T. The business school ‘business’: Some lessons from the US experience. Journal of management studies, v. 41, n. 8, p. 1501-1520, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00484.x
PFEFFER, Jeffrey; VEIGA, John F. Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of management perspectives, v. 13, n. 2, p. 37-48, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1899547
PFEFFER, Jeffrey. The Role of the General Manager in the New Economy: Can We Save People from Technology Dysfunctions?. Springer International Publishing, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20680-2_4
PFEFFER, Jeffrey; SUTTON, Robert I. Knowing “what” to do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. California management review, v. 42, n. 1, p. 83-108, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000812569904200101
PICCOLO, Ronald F. et al. The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of organizational behavior, v. 31, n. 2‐3, p. 259-278, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627
PIETERSE, Anne Nederveen et al. Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of organizational behavior, v. 31, n. 4, p. 609-623, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650
PRATT, Michael G.; ROCKMANN, Kevin W.; KAUFMANN, Jeffrey B. Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of management journal, v. 49, n. 2, p. 235-262, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786060
PUTNAM, Linda L.; NICOTERA, Anne M. (Ed.). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. Routledge, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891025
PUTNAM, Linda L. The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach, p. 31-54, 1983.
QUINN, Ryan W. Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Administrative science quarterly, v. 50, n. 4, p. 610-641, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.610
RAELIN, Joseph A. Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of management learning & education, v. 6, n. 4, p. 495-519, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.27694950
REGER, Rhonda K. et al. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of management review, v. 19, n. 3, p. 565-584, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412271815
REYNOLDS, Michael. Reflection and critical reflection in management learning. Management learning, v. 29, n. 2, p. 183-200, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698292004
REYNOLDS, Michael; VINCE, Russ. Critical management education and action-based learning: Synergies and contradictions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, v. 3, n. 4, p. 442-456, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2004.15112552
ROWLINSON, Michael et al. Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization studies, v. 31, n. 1, p. 69-87, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347056
SAVOLAINEN, Reijo. Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Scarecrow Press, 2008.
SENGE, Peter M. et al. The art and practice of the learning organization. 1990.
SCHOENEBORN, Dennis; KUHN, Timothy R.; KÄRREMAN, Dan. The communicative constitution of organization, organizing, and organizationality. Organization Studies, v. 40, n. 4, p. 475-496, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618782284
SCHREYÖGG, Georg; GEIGER, Daniel. The significance of distinctiveness: A proposal for rethinking organizational knowledge. Organization, v. 14, n. 1, p. 77-100, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071861
SHOCKLEY-ZALABAK, Pamela S. Fundamentals of Organizational Communication: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Education Limited, 2014.
SPENDER, J.‐C. Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of organizational change management, v. 9, n. 1, p. 63-78, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819610156813
SPREITZER, Gretchen et al. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization science, v. 16, n. 5, p. 537-549, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
SVEIBY, Karl‐Erik. A knowledge‐based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of intellectual capital, v. 2, n. 4, p. 344-358, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930110409651
TALJA, Sanna; TUOMINEN, Kimmo; SAVOLAINEN, Reijo. “Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of documentation, v. 61, n. 1, p. 79-101, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578023
TEECE, David J.; PISANO, Gary; SHUEN, Amy. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509-533, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
TOMKINS, Leah; ULUS, Eda. ‘Oh, was that “experiential learning”?!’Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb’s learning cycle. Management Learning, v. 47, n. 2, p. 158-178, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615587451
TOOR, Shamas-ur-Rehman; OFORI, George. Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 90, p. 533-547, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0059-3
TREVIÑO, Linda K.; WEAVER, Gary R.; REYNOLDS, Scott J. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of management, v. 32, n. 6, p. 951-990, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258
TSOUKAS, Haridimos; CHIA, Robert. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization science, v. 13, n. 5, p. 567-582, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
TSOUKAS, Haridimos. Do we really understand tacit knowledge. Managing knowledge: an essential reader, v. 107, p. 1-18, 2005.
VANSTEENKISTE, Maarten et al. Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of personality and social psychology, v. 87, n. 2, p. 246, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
WANG, Sheng; NOE, Raymond A. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, v. 20, n. 2, p. 115-131, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
WASKO, Molly McLure; FARAJ, Samer. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, p. 35-57, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
WATSON, Tony J. Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, v. 16, n. 5, p. 805-821, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600503
WILSON, Tom D. et al. The nonsense of knowledge management. Information research, v. 8, n. 1, p. 8-1, 2002.
WRIGHT, Alex; MICHAILOVA, Snejina. Critical literature reviews: A critique and actionable advice. Management Learning, v. 54, n. 2, p. 177-197, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211073961
ZHANG, Xiaomeng; BARTOL, Kathryn M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of management journal, v. 53, n. 1, p. 107-128, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
Publicado
Como citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Márcio da Silva Finamor, Davi Jose de Souza da Silva
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista é publicada sob a licença Creative Commons - Atribuição - Uso Não Comercial - Partilha nos Mesmos Termos 4.0 Internacional.
O trabalho publicado é considerado colaboração e, portanto, o autor não receberá qualquer remuneração para tal, bem como nada lhe será cobrado em troca para a publicação.
Os textos são de responsabilidade de seus autores.
É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial dos textos da revista, desde que citada a fonte.
