Ética em mídias emergentes e ambientes de aprendizado eletrônico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v11i2.827Palavras-chave:
Ética Digital, E-Aprendizado, Responsabilidade Ética, Ensino da ÉticaResumo
O avanço das tecnologias de informação e comunicação (TIC) gera a oportunidade de novas formas de conhecer e fazer, muitas vezes ultrapassando a capacidade dos humanos de acompanhar as mudanças. Essa disparidade entre pessoas e tecnologia aparece na aplicação da ética aos espaços digitais, particularmente no campo de ambientes de aprendizado eletrônico. Estados recentes mostram como padrões éticos aplicados em espaços físicos estão sendo utilizados também em ambientes digitais, mas esta utilização não dá conta dos desafios do aprendizado eletrônico, incluindo as percepções de fraude, ou os “cola”, e das responsabilidades vitais de pesquisadores online. Este artigo explora o campo do comportamento ético relacionado aos ambientes de aprendizado eletrônico. Especificamente, foca na problemática da desonestidade acadêmica entre estudantes, além das obrigações dos professores de ensinar e de conduzir os estudos de forma a obedecer padrões éticos. O artigo conclui com a discussão das implicações da priorização e da integridade na ética digital.
Referências
Angell, L. R. (2006). The relationship of impulsiveness, personal efficacy, and academic motivation to college cheating. College Student Journal: 40(1), 118–131.
Bassett, E. H., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233–249.
Bullard, S. B. (2012). The Ethics of emerging media: Information, social norms and new media technology, edited by Bruce E. Drushel and Kathleen German [Book review]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(3), 526–528.
Bynum, T. W. (Ed.). (1985). Computers and ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bynum, T. W., & Rogerson, S. (1996). Introduction and overview: Global information ethics, Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(2), 131-136
Bynum, T.W. & Rogerson, S. (Eds.). (2004). Computer ethics and professional responsibility Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M., & Passow, H. J. (2006). Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards cheating. Journal of Engineering Education: 95(3), 181–194.
Drushel, B. E., & German, K (eds.) (2011). The ethics of emerging media: Information, social norms and new media technology. New York, NY: Continuum.
Eberhardt, D., Rice, N. D., & Smith, L. D. (2003). Effects of Greek membership on academic integrity, alcohol abuse, and risky sexual behavior at a small college. NASPA Journal: 41(1), 135–146.
Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm
Gallant, T. B. & Drinan, P. (2006). Organizational theory and student cheating: Explanation, responses, and strategies. The Journal of Higher Education: 77(5), 839–860.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 94–10
Gearhart, D. (2001) Ethics in distance education: Developing ethical policies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/spring41/gearhart41.html
Gotterbarn, D. (1991). “Computer ethics: Responsibility regained.” National Forum: The Phi Beta Kappa Journal, 71: 26 –31.
Higbee, J. L. & Thomas, P. V. (2002). Student and faculty perceptions of behaviors that constitute cheating. NASPA Journal: 40(1), 39–52.
Hughes, J. M. & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education: 36(2), 1–21.
Hwang, S., & Roth, W. M. (2004). Ethics on research on learning: Dialectics of praxis and praxeology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www. qualitative-research.net/fqs/
Isa, P., Samah, S., & Jusoff, K. (2008). Inculcating values and ethics in higher education e-learning drive: UiTM i-Learn user policy. Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology, 40: 452–456.
Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students?. The Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101-110.
Jendrek, M. P. (1992). Students' Reactions to Academic Dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 33(3), 260-73.
Johnson, D. G. (2001). Computer ethics (3rd ed). Prentice-Hall
Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233–247.
Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E., & Budzevičienė, R. (2009). Web-based model of multiple criteria ethical decision-making for ethical behavior of students. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 10(1), 71–84.
Kant, I. (1956). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans). 3rd ed. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (2007). Ethical issues in qualitative e-learning research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 1–14.
Kaplan, W., & Mable, P. (1998). Students’ perceptions of academic integrity: Curtailing
Kitchin, H. A. (2003). The Tri-Council policy statement and re- search in cyberspace: Research ethics, the Internet, and revising a living document. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1(4), 397–418.
Ludlow, P. (2010). WikiLeaks and hacktivist culture. The Nation, 4, 25–26.
Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: an analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125–136.
Manne, R. (2011). Bad news: Murdoch's Australian and the shaping of the nation. Quarterly Essay, (43), 1.
Matters(pp. 22–31). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc.King, S. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of the results. Information Society, 12(2), 119–127. Retrieved from http://venus.soci.niu. edu/~jthomas/ethics/tis/go.storm
McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 451–467.
Mitchell, T., & Carroll, J. (2008). Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors. Nurse Education Today, 28(2), 218-226.
Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics? In T. W. Bynum (Ed.), Computers and Ethics (pp. 266 – 275)
Penny, K. I., & Dukic, D. (2012). E-learning participation in higher education: A study of Scottish and Croatian students. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 20(3), 183–188.
Reiman, J. (2004). Driving to the panopticon: A philosophical exploration of the risks to privacy posed by the information technology of the future. In B. Rössler (Ed.), Privacies: Philosophical evaluations (pp. 194–214). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Roberts, C. J., & Hai-Jew, S. (2009). Issues of academic integrity: An online course for students addressing academic dishonesty. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2). http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/3511
Schrum, L. (1997). Ethical research in the information age: Beginning the dialog. Computer in Human Behavior, 13(2), 117–125.
Spaulding, M. (2009). Perceptions of academic honesty in online vs. face-to-face classrooms. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 183–198.
Toprak, E., Ozkanal, B., Aydin, S., & Kaya, S. (2010, April). Ethics in e-learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2).
Violations. In D. D. Burnett, L. Rudolph, & K. O. Clifford (Eds.), Academic integrity
Walther, J. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enables research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_wal_full.html
Waskul, D., & Douglass, M. (1996). Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. Information Society, 12(2), 129–139. Retrieved from http://venus.soci.niu.edu/~jthomas/ethics/tis/go.dennis
Who moved my computer? Online research challenges: Technology changes ethical considerations. (2010, July). Clinical Trials Administrator: 75–76.
Wilhelm, P. G. (2002). International validation of the corruption perceptions index: Implications for business ethics and entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(3), 177–189.
Zaiane, O. (2001). Practical applications of data mining. Retrieved from http://vu.cs.sfu.ca/GEN/ welcome/welcome.html
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Bolanle A. Olaniran, Indi M. Williams
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam na Liinc em Revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Consulte a Política de Acesso Livre e Autoarquivamento para informações permissão de depósitos de versões pré-print de manuscritos e artigos submetidos ou publicados à/pela Liinc em Revista.
Liinc em Revista, publicada pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, é licenciada sob os termos da Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional – CC BY 4.0 
