Original and unpublished: requirements for article submission to Information Science scientific journals

Authors

  • Sarah Miglioli Instituto Nacional de Educação de Surdos. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v8i2.493

Keywords:

Originality, Ineditism, Scientific journals, Scholarly communication, Self-plagiarism

Abstract

 Questions about the criteria of originality and novelty repeatedly permeate the universe of scholars and researchers in the field of information science, highlighting the need for more accurate definition of these concepts. This study seeks to contribute to the clarification by performing a semantic analysis of publishing guidelines and standards for authors, stipulated by the scientific journals in the field of information science.

 

References

<http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57676/>. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2012.

ANCIB – Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação. Periódicos em CI. Disponível em: <http://www.ancib.org.br/pages/periodicos-em-ci.php>. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2012.

ANGELL, M.; KASSIRER, J. P. The Ingelfinger rule revisited. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 325, n. 19, p. 1371-1373, 1991.

BARRETO, A. Sobre a originalidade do texto e a função do autor. Aldobarreto's Blog: refletindo sobre a informação, 10 jun. 2012. Disponível em: <http://aldobarreto.wordpress.com/2012/06/10/sobre-a-originalidade-do-texto-e-a-funcao-do-autor/>. Acesso em 20 jun. 2012.

BOISVERT, R. F.; IRWIN, M. J. Plagiarism on the rise. Communications of the ACM, v. 49, n. 6, p. 23–24, 2006.

BOURDIEU, P. The science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

BRETAG, T.; MAHMUD, S. M. Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? Journal of Academic Ethics, v. 7, Issue 3, p. 193-205, set. 2009.

DAVIS, P. M. The ethics of republishing: a case study of Emerald/MCB university press journals. Library Resources & Technical Services, v. 49, n. 2, p. 72-78, 2005.

ERRAMI, M.; GARNER, H. A tale of two citations. Nature, v. 451, n. 7177, p. 397-399, 2008.

FOUCAULT, M. O que é um autor. 3. ed. Lisboa: Vega, 1992.

FREIRE, I. M. [Resposta a mensagem em lista de discussão] Re: Originalidade de artigos cientificos. 10 jun. 2012. Disponível em: <http://br.groups.yahoo.com/group/ancib/message/3516>. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2012.

GUETZKOW, J.; LAMONT, M.; MALLARD, G.What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? American Sociological Review, v. 69, n. 2, p. 190-212, abr. 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593084>. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2012.

INGELFINGER, F. J. Definition of sole contribution. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 28, p. 676- 677, 1969.

KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress, 1970.

LANGDON-NEUNER, E. Publication more than once: duplicate publication and reuse of text. The Journalof Tehran University Heart Centre, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1–4, 2008.

LARIVIÈRE, V.; GINGRAS, Y. On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007).

Journal of Documentation, v. 66, n. 2, p. 179-190, 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.ost.uqam.ca/Portals/0/docs/articles/2010/Duplicate%20paper.pdf>. Acesso em: 24 jun. 2012.

LATOUR, B. Science in action.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.

MERTON, R. K. The Matthew effect in science. Science, v. 159, n. 3810, p. 56-63, 1968.

MERTON, R. K. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

PIELOT, M. To blog or not to blog ongoing research?16 nov. 2010. Disponível em: <http://pielot.org/2010/11/16/to-blog-or-not-to-blog-ongoing-research/>. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2012.

STIGLER, G. J. The nature and role of originality in scientific progress. Economica, New Series, v. 22, n. 88, p. 293-302, Nov. 1955.

VALERIO, P. M.; PINHEIRO, L. V. Da comunicação científica à divulgação. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 20, n. 2, p. 159-169, maio/ago., 2008. Disponível em: <http://revistas.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/viewissue.php?id=19>. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2012.

VILLA LOBOS, Ana Paula. Originalidade de artigos científicos. [Mensagem em lista de discussão]. 9 jun. 2012. Disponível em: <http://br.groups.yahoo.com/group/ancib/message/3515>. Acesso em: 25. jun. 2012.

Published

19/12/2012

Issue

Section

New Paradigms of Scholarly Communication: Widening the Debate