The The knowledge society and humanism

Authors

  • Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v11i2.839

Keywords:

Humanismo, Sociedade do Conhecimento, Epistemologia.

Abstract

The paper discusses epistemological aspects of the relationship among science, technology and humanism in the era of information, here called society of knowledge. The fundamental assumption is that there is a simultaneous development of scientific and technological knowledge, on the one hand, and humanism, on the other. However, this relationship is not parallel. Humanism operates transversely to science and technology. To the extent that science and technology do not have a value in themselves, but in their uses, so can they be instruments to avoid human autonomy as, on the contrary, facilitate this autonomy. In the society of knowledge, scientific and technological developments are “necessary conditions” for the emergence of humanism – or at least the kind of humanism engendered within it – , but they are not “sufficient conditions”. The paper attempts to show that the simultaneity and the transversality intersections between knowledge and humanism in this model of society suggest that this relationship necessarily includes an epistemological perspective, that is, there is an epistemological assumption in the human ethics condition itself. We are ethical beings because we know, although the act of knowing does not make us necessarily ethical beings.

 

References

CAPRA, F. A teia da vida: uma nova compreensão dos sistemas vivos. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1997.

CONDÉ, Mauro, L. L. As teias da razão: Wittgenstein e a crise da racionalidade moderna. Belo Horizonte: Argvmentvm, 2004.

FLECK, Ludwik. Gênese e desenvolvimento de um fato científico. Belo Horizonte: Fabre Factum, 2010.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Theatrum philosophicum. São Paulo: Princípio, 1997.

GARGANI, Aldo. Crisis de la razón. Cidade do México: Siglo Veintiuno, 1983.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Por que uma teoria dos sistemas? In: NEVES, C.; SAMIOS, E. (Coord.). Niklas Luhmann e a nova teoria dos sistemas. Porto Alegre: Ed. da UFRGS, 1997.

______. Sobre os fundamentos teórico-sistêmicos da teoria da sociedade. In: NEVES, C.; SAMIOS, E. (Coord.). Niklas Luhmann e a nova teoria dos sistemas. Porto Alegre: Ed. da UFRGS, 1997.

______. Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.

ROSSI, Paolo. Os filósofos e a máquina. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1989.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. Elogio do lazer. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1977.

SNOW, C. P. As duas culturas e um segundo olhar. São Paulo: Edusp, 1993.

WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Investigações filosóficas. São Paulo: Abril, 1978.

ZILSEL, Edgar. The social roots of science. In: ______. The social origins of modern science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000a. 1. ed. 1939.

______. The sociological roots of science.In: ______. The social origins of modern science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000b. 1. ed. 1942.

Published

30/11/2015

Issue

Section

Ethical and Epistemological Dilemmas of Information Age