Digital Humanities of the South and GAFAM. For a Geopolitics of Digital Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v15i1.4730Keywords:
DH and Global South, Geopolitics of the Internet, Digital Hegemonies, Digital Colonialism, Cultural diversityAbstract
Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple e Microsoft (GAFAM) today not only represent the world’s biggest financial empire but exploiting the open architecture of the Web took control of the technologies that guide private consumption and dictate times and methods of the production and access to digital knowledge. Digital Humanities cannot longer ignore the existence of this dispositif and its effects on cultural and epistemic diversity. If DH were born for preserving our cultural heritage and possibly guiding the digital transformation of humanities and social sciences, it is necessary to know the geopolitics of global communication systems, the neo-colonial ambitions of multinational corporations or the pillage of digital data, the new raw material provided by emerging countries. GAFAM plays a central role in this scenario, spearheading the hegemony of the Anglosphere which threatens to make invisible or annihilate cultural diversity. Its dominion is based on an ecosystem of devices, applications and media that on one side allow to create communities gathered around algorithms-driven experiences, and on the other penetrate each space of people’s private life – the real added value of these network giants. In this scenario, would it be possible to build a counter-narrative of the “digital revolution” designed by a monocultural private empire? However, the margins of the Global South are witnessing a number of initiatives and projects focused on the reappropriation of digital technology with the aim of protecting and preserving local territories, languages and traditions. Biocultural multipolarity seems therefore the only possible answer to GAFAM’s global pedagogy. Southern DH need to articulate this response in two urgent steps: developing a critical digital literacy and revaluing the margins as a source of innovation and social change.
References
Allington, Daniel, Sarah Brouillette, David Golumbia. 2016. “Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities.” Los Angeles Review of Books. May 1, 2016. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/.
Alvares, Claude Alphonso, Shad, Shalem Faruqui (Eds.). Decolonising the University: the Emerging Quest for Non-Eurocentric Paradigms, Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2012.
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London New York: Verso, 1983. Trad. it. Comunità immaginate: origini e fortuna dei nazionalismi. Roma: Manifestolibri, 1996.
Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis. Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur. Bern: Francke,1956 (trad. esp. Mimesis: la representación de la realidad en la literatura occidental. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1979).
Baca-Feldman, Carlos. F.; Parra Hinojosa, Daniela; Huerta Velázquez, Erick. “El espectro radioeléctrico como bien común: una reflexión entorno a la comunalidad y las redes celulares comunitarias en Oaxaca, México.” Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias de la Comunicación, vol. 14, n. 26 (2017): 16-26. https://www.alaic.org/revista/index.php/alaic/article/view/907/480.
Barandiaran, Xabier. E.; Vila-Viñas, David. “The Flok Doctrine.” Journal of Peer Production, n. 7 (2015). http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/the-flok-doctrine/
Bassani, Giorgio. Gli occhiali d’oro. 21. ed. Milano: Oscar Mondadori, 2012.
Barthes, Roland. La chambre claire: note sur la photographie. Paris: Gallimard, 1980 (trad. esp. La cámara lúcida: Nota sobre la fotografía. Barcelona: Paidós, 1999).
Bauman, Zygmun, Lyon, David. Liquid Surveillance. A Conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Trad. it. Sesto potere. La sorveglianza nella modernità liquida, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2014.
Benkler, Yochai. “Degrees of Freedom, Dimensions of Power”. Daedalus 145, n. 1 (2016): 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00362.
Benigni, Glauco. “L’universo del 5G, tra big data, stakeholders, mercato e sicurezza.” Repubblica.it, 6 de diciembre de 2018. https://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/mobile/2018/12/06/news/l_universo_del_5g_tra_big_data_stakeholders_mercato_e_sicurezza-213575384/?refresh_ce.
Benigni, Glauco. La rete tra libertà e controllo. Dagli alchimisti Nasdaq al caso Snowden. Web nostrum 4. Firenze: goWare, 2015.
Benardou, Agiatis, Champion, Erik, Dallas, Costis, Hughes, Lorna. “Introduction: a Critique of Digital Practices and Research Infrastructures.” In Benardou, A., Champion, E., Dallas, C. and Hughes, L. (eds.), Cultural Heritage Infrastructures in Digital Humanities. Series: Digital Research in the Arts and Humanities. Routledge: Abingdon, 2018.
Blum, Andrew. Tubes: Behind the Scenes at the Internet. London: Penguin, 2012.
Bowker, Geoffrey. “All knowledge is Local.” Learning Communities. International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts, 2, 2010: 138-149.
Casarrubea, Giuseppe; Mario José Cereghino. Operazione Husky. Guerra piscologica e intelligence nei documenti segreti inglesi e americani sullo sbarco in Sicilia. Roma: Castelvecchi, 2013.
Chan, Anita S., Jenkins, Henry. “Peru’s Digital Futures: An Interview with Anita Say Chan (Part One).” 17 febbraio 2015. http://henryjenkins.org/2015/02/perus-digital-futures-an-interview-with-anita-say-chan-part-one.html.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Updating to remain the same: habitual new media. Kindle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2016.
CLACSO. Grupos de Trabajo seleccionados para el periodo 2016 - 2019. Bienes comunes y acceso abierto. (2016) https://clacso.org.ar/grupos_trabajo/detalle_gt.php?ficha=877&s=5&idioma=
Clark, David D. “The Contingent Internet”. Daedalus 145, n. 1 (2016): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00361.
Comaroff, Jean; Comaroff, John, L. Theory from the South. Or, How Euro-America is evolving Toward Africa. Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers, 2012.
Darnton, Robert. George Washington’s False Teeth. An Unconventional Guide to the Eighteenth Century. New York: Norton, 2003. Trad. it. L’età dell’informazione: una guida non convenzionale al Settecento. Milano: Adelphi, 2007.
“Data Colonialism. Critiquing Consent and Control in ‘Tech for Social Change’”. Model View Culture. A Magazine about Technology, Culture and Diversity, 43. 15 de noviembre de 2016.
Davenport, Tara. “Submarine Cables, Cybersecurity and International Law: An Intersectional Analysis”, Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 24, n. 1 (2015): 57-109. http://scholarship.law.edu/jlt/vol24/iss1/4.
Dean, James et al. Threats to Undersea Cable Communications. September 2017. Department of Homeland Security Analyst Exchange Program. https://www.dni.gov/files/PE/Documents/1---2017-AEP-Threats-to-Undersea-Cable-Communications.pdf.
Deibert, Ron. “The Geopolitics of Cyberspace after Snowden”, Current History. A Journal of Contemporary World Affairs, vol. 114, n. 768 (2015): 9-15. http://www.currenthistory.com/Article.php?ID=1210.
DeNardis, Laura. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.
DeVoe, Anne. “Carrying a Piece of Congo in Our Pockets: Global Complicity to Congo’s Sexual Violence and the Conflict Minerals Trade,” Seattle Journal for Social Justice, Vol. 10, n. 1, (2011): 463-507. http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol10/iss1/30.
Dixon, Chris. “The Internet Economy”, 29 de abril de 2016. https://medium.com/@cdixon/the-internet-economy-fc43f3eff58a.
Dourish, Paul. “‘Computational Thinking’ and the Postcolonial in the Teaching From Country Programme”. Learning Communities. International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts, 2, 2010: 91-101.
Fabbri, Dario et al. “La rete a stelle e strisce”, Limes. Rivista Italiana di Geopolitica, n. 10 (2018).
Fiormonte, Domenico; Numerico, Teresa; Tomasi, Francesca. The Digital Humanist. A Critical Inquiry. New York: Punctum Books, 2015.
Fiormonte, Domenico. “Digital Humanities and the Geopolitics of Knowledge.” Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, vol. 7, n.1 (2017). DOI: http://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.274.
Fiormonte, Domenico; Priego, Ernesto. “Knowledge Monopolies and Global Academic Publishing.” Paper presented at the conference The Toronto School. Then, Now, Next, University of Toronto, October 13-16, 2016. https://thewinnower.com/papers/4965-knowledge-monopolies-and-global-academic-publishing.
Frankel, Todd C. “The Cobalt Pipeline. Tracing the path from deadly hand-dug mines in Congo to consumers’ phones and laptops.” The Washington Post. 30 de septiembre de 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/batteries/congo-cobalt-mining-for-lithium-ion-battery/.
Gairola, Rahul K., Roth, Martin. “Cyber Zones: Digital Spatialities and Material Realities across Asia.”Asiascape: Digital Asia 6 (2019): 4-16. doi:10.1163/22142312-12340099
Galeano, Eduardo. Las venas abiertas de América Latina. México, DF: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 2004.
Galloway, Scott. The Four. The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google, London: Penguin, 2018.
Gallino, Luciano. La scomparsa dell’Italia industriale. Torino: Einaudi, 2013.
Gigliozzi, Giuseppe. Saggi di informatica umanistica (a cura di M. Trevisan). Milano: Unicopli, 2008.
Graham, Mark. ed. Digital Economy at Global Margins, Cambridge – Lodon: MIT, 2019.
Gramsci, Antonio. Quaderni del carcere, Edizione critica dell'Istituto Gramsci a cura di Valentino Gerratana, 4 voll., Torino: Einaudi, 1975.
Guilherme, Manuela; Gunther, Dietz. “Introduction. Winds of the South: Intercultural university Models for the 21st Century”. Winds of the South: Intercultural university Models for the 21st Century. Special Issue at Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 16, n. 1 (2017): 7–16.
Hill, Kashmir. «I Cut the “Big Five” Tech Giants From My Life. It Was Hell». Gizmodo, 7 febbraio 2019. https://gizmodo.com/i-cut-the-big-five-tech-giants-from-my-life-it-was-hel-1831304194.
Hu, Tung-Hui. A Prehistory of the Cloud. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.
Hurst, Mark. “The Geopolitics of the Internet.” CCCBLAB. Research and Innovation in the Cultural Sphere, 11 de diciembre 2013. http://blogs.cccb.org/lab/en/article_la-geopolitica-dinternet/.
Innis, Harold Adams. Empire and communications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. I ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950. Trad. it. Impero e comunicazioni. Roma: Meltemi, 2001.
Jeet Singh, Parminder. “Developing Countries in the Emerging Global Digital Order. A Critical Geopolitical Challenge to which the Global South Must Respond.” IT for Change. Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities. 17 de febrero de 2017. http://www.itforchange.net/developing-countries-emerging-global-digital-order
Jullien, François. Il n’y a pas d’identité culturelle. Paris: L’Herne, 2016. Trad. it. L’identità culturale non esiste. Torino: Einaudi, 2018.
Kiriya, Ilya. “Les études médiatiques dans les BRICS contre les bases de données occidentales: critique de la domination académique anglophone.” Hermès, La Revue, 79(3), 2017: 71-77. https://www.cairn.info/revue-hermes-la-revue-2017-3-page-71.htm.
Kobek, Jarett. Io odio Internet: un romanzo utile. Roma: Fazi, 2018.
Kress, Gunther. Multimodalità: un approccio socio-semiotico alla comunicazione contemporanea. Bari: Progedit, 2015.
Kulikova, Alexandra. “What is really going on with Russia’s new internet laws”, 24 ottobre 2014. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/what-is-really-going-on-with-russias-new-internet-laws/.
Lal, Vinay. Empire of Knowledge Culture and Plurality in the Global Economy. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications, 2005.
Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie; Mongeon, Philippe. “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.” PLoS ONE 10(6), 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
Liaropoulos, Andrew N. “Exploring the Complexity of Cyberspace Governance: State Sovereignty, Multistakeholderism, and Power Politics”, Journal of Information Warfare, vol. 15, n. 4 (2016): 14-26.
López Guevara, Estefanía.; Salcedo-Albarán, Eduardo. Trafficking of Coltan in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Global Observatory of Transnational Criminal Networks. Research Paper No. 6. VORTEX Working Papers No. 18. Bogotá: Vortex Foundation, 2017.
Manjoo, Farhad. “Tech’s Frightful Five: They’ve Got Us.” New York Times, 10 maggio 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/technology/techs-frightful-five-theyve-got-us.html.
Martino, Luigi. “La Quinta Dimensione della Conflittualità. La rilevanza Strategica del Cyberspace e i Rischi di Guerra Cibernetica”, Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi Strategici, Internazionali e Imprenditoriali (CSSII), Università degli Studi di Firenze, 2012. https://www.cssii.unifi.it/vp-154-articoli-e-paper.html.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, Kenneth Cukier. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: John Murray, 2017 (trad. esp. Big data: la revolución de los datos masivos. Madrid: Turner, 2018).
McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962 (trad. esp. La galaxia Gutenberg: génesis del "Homo typographicus". Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg. Círculo de Lectores, 1998).
Mignolo, Walter (2018). “On Pluriversality and Multipolar World Order”, in Reiter, Bernd (ed.). Constructing the Pluriverse. The Geopolitics of Knowledge. Durahm and London: Duke University Press, 2018: 90-116.
Milan, Stefania; Treré, Emiliano. “Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism.” Television & New Media, 2019, Vol. 20(4): 319-335. DOI: 10.1177/1527476419837739.
Mueller, Milton. Will the Internet Fragment?. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.
Mukerjee, Subhayan. “Net neutrality, Facebook, and India’s battle to #SaveTheInternet.” Communication and the Public, Vol. 1, n.3 (2016): 356–361. DOI: 10.1177/2057047316665850.
Oberhaus, Daniel. “How I Quit Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and Amazon”. Motherboard, 13 dicembre 2018. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ev3qw7/how-to-quit-apple-microsoft-google-facebook-amazon.
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technoloizing of the Word. Methuen & Co., 1982 (trad. esp. Oralidad y escritura: tecnologías de la palabra. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013).
O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. London: Penguin, 2018.
Parikka, Jussi. A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.
Philip, Kavita; Irani, Lilly; Dourish, Paul. “Postcolonial Computing: A Tactical Survey”. Science Technology Human Values, 37(1): 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910389594.
Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin, 2006.
Porro, Mario. “Jullien, l’identità culturale non esiste”. Doppiozero. 27 de agosto de 2018. https://www.doppiozero.com/materiali/jullien-lidentita-culturale-non-esiste
Reichenstein, Oliver. «Web Trend Map 2018: The Web like We Know It Is Gone—We Want It Back!», 15 de enero de 2018. https://ia.net/topics/web-trend-map-2018.
Reiter, Bernd, ed. Constructing the Pluriverse. The Geopolitics of Knowledge. Durahm and London: Duke University Press, 2018.
Ricciardi, Mario. «La Costituzione del digitale». DigitCult - Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures 3, n. 3 (23 dicembre 2018): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888255208975.
Risam, Roopika (2019). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Rockwell, Geoffrey, Fiormonte, Domenico. “Palantir: Reading the Surveillance Thing. Critical Software Stories as a Way of the Digital Humanities.” AIUCD 2017 Conference, La Sapienza Università di Roma, 26 y 28 de enero de 2017.
Rossiter, Ned; Soenke, Zehle. “The Aesthetics of Algorithmic Experience”. Organized Networks (blog). 4 de enero de 2015. https://nedrossiter.org/?p=436.
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. “Una nueva visión de Europa. Aprender del Sur global”, in Santos, Boaventura de Sousa; Mendes, José Manuel (eds.). Demodiversidad. Imaginar nuevas posibilidades democráticas. Madrid: Akal, 2017: 59-92.
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, Nunes, João Arriscado; Meneses, Maria Paula. (2007). “Introduction: Opening up the Canon of Knowledge and Recognition of Difference”, in Santos, B. Sousa (ed.). Another Knowledge is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. London-New York: Verso, 2007: xix-xv.
Schmidt, Desmond. “The Role of Markup in the Digital Humanities.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung (Special Issue: Digital Humanities), 37, 3, 2012: 125-146.
Shehabi, Arman; Josephine Smith, Sarah; Sartor, Dale A.; Brown, Richard E.; Herrlin, Magnus; Koomey, Jonathan G.; Masanet, Eric R.; Horner, Nathaniel; Lima Azevedo, Inês; Lintner, William. United States Data Center Energy Usage Report. 2016. https://eta.lbl.gov/publications/united-states-data-center-energy.
Simmons, Anjuan. “Technology Colonialism.” Model View Culture. A Magazine about Technology, Culture and Diversity, 27. 18 de septiembre de 2015. https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/technology-colonialism.
Sordi, Paolo. La macchina dello storytelling. Facebook e il potere di narrazione nell’era dei social media. Roma: Bordeaux Edizioni, 2018.
Steiner, George. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 (trad. esp. Después de Babel. Aspectos del lenguaje y la traducción. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2001).
Sushcheva, Natalia, Jacques Fontanel. “Les GAFAM”. 2018. hal-01935957. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01935957/document.
Taplin, Jonathan. Move fast and break things: how Facebook, Google, and Amazon have cornered culture and what it means for all of us. London: Macmillan, 2017.
Telles, Marcio. “Ours Is A Battery Life: Infrastructuralism, Materiality, and Endology of Media”. Paper presented at the Toronto School Conference. Then. Now. Next, Toronto - 13-16 October 2016. https://www.academia.edu/26756892/Ours_Is_A_Battery_Life_infrastructuralism_materiality_and_endology_of_media
Tufekci, Zeynep. «As the Pirates Become CEOs: The Closing of the Open Internet». Daedalus 145, n. 1 (2016): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00366.
UNESCO, Investing in cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue: UNESCO World Report 2009. http://www.unesco.org/en/world-reports/cultural-diversity.
Williams, Raymond. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory”, in Cultural Materialism. Selected Essays. London and New York: Verso, 2005.
Winseck, Dwayne. “The Geopolitical Economy of the Global Internet Infrastructure Source,” Journal of Information Policy, vol. 7 (2017): 228-267. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jinfopoli.7.2017.0228.
Yoshiki, Mikami, Kodama, Shigeaki. “Measuring Linguistic Diversity on the Web”, in Vannini, L., Le Crosnier, H. (eds.). Net.Lang. Towards the Multilingual Cyberspace. Caen: C&F Éditions, 2012, pp. 121-139.
Zaugg, Isabelle. “Imagining a multilingual cyberspace. How the internet damaged linguistic diversity,and what you can do to fix it”. 2019. https://findingctrl.nesta.org.uk/imagining-a-multilingual-cyberspace/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Domenico Fiormonte, Paolo Sordi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant Liinc em Revista the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their manuscripts and versios of record (VoR) in their personal web pages or institutional repositories, generic repositories etc., before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication in Liinc em Revista, according to its open access depositing policy registered in the Directory of Editorial Policies of Brazilian Journals (DIADORIM), kindly providing a link to the article published on Liinc's website.
Liinc em Revista, published by Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – CC BY 4.0 
