The present work, based on a reconstructive approach method, with an exploratory profile, analyzes technologies and innovations used to face the COVID-19 pandemic, problematizing, based on Judith Butler's theoretical contribution on precariousness and precarity, the differential allocation of these measures impacts, considering technical, legal, and ethical challenges. Detailing the technologies used to fight the pandemic, combined with the analysis of concrete cases, we seek to demonstrate the lack of proportionality of measures that have been naturalized in the face of the crisis, especially regarding the rights of groups politically vulnerable, either invisible or overexposed and targeted. In conclusion, it points out the need to build alternatives are more sensitive to the different layers of vulnerability to which people, individually and collectively, are subjected