The representation of woman's concept in the Decimal Dewey Classification (DDC) and in the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC)
two perspectives for the same concept?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v14i2.4340Keywords:
Woman, Dewey Decimal Classification, Universal Decimal ClassificationAbstract
The dynamics and emergence of new knowledge requires building new knowledge organization systems and reviewing others for the location and access of knowledege. In this process the structures of knowledge organization assume particular relevance, as effective instruments to accomplish these purposes. For its longevity, the bibliographical classifications stand out and among them particularly the Dewey Decimal Classification (CDD) and the Universal Decimal Classification (CDU). It is proposed to identify how these two systems represent the concept of woman and whether this can be considered as an indicator of two perspectives on the same concept. A qualitative exploratory approach was adopted, based on literature review and comparative analysis of the representation of this concept in the two systems considered. Two different perspectives are not observed in relation to the woman’s concept, because the two systems continue to translate the positivist mentality in which they were conceived. The low representativeness of the concept of woman in the two classification systems is evident with regard to exhaustivity and specificity. Both systems reflect the notion of woman in a depreciative and inferior plan to the masculine, translating the traditional stereotype.
References
REFERÊNCIAS
ANDERMAHR, S.; LOVELL, T.; WOLKOWITZ, C. A glossary of feminist theory. London: Arnold, 1997.
BARBOUR, R. Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2014.
BÉTHERY, A. Guide de la classification décimale de Dewey: tables abrégées e la XXII edition intégrale en langue anglaise. Paris: Cercle de la libraire, 2005.
BEAUVOIR, Simone. Le deuxiéme sexe. Paris: Gallimard, 1949.
BRUSCHINI, C; ARDAILLON, D.; UNBEHAUM, S. G. Tesauro para Estudos de gênero e sobre Mulheres, 1998. Disponível em: <http://www.fcc.org.br/conteudosespeciais/tesauro/arquivos/TPEDGESM.pdf>. Acesso em 15 abr. 2018.
CAZENEUVE, J. (coord.). Dicionário de sociologia. Lisboa: Verbo, 1982.
CLASIFICACIÓN DECIMAL UNIVERSAL (CDU). Madrid: AENOR, 2016.
COUTINHO, C. Metodologia de Investigação em Ciências Sociais. Coimbra: Almedina, 2015.
DANTON, J. P. The Dimensions of Comparative Librarianship. Chicago: American Library Association, 1973.
EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY.Gender Equality Glossary and Thesaurus. Disponível em: <.http://eige.europa.eu/rdc/thesaurus>. Acesso em 05 abr. 2018.
______. Gender equality glossary and thesauros. Disponível em: <http://eige.europa.eu/rdc/thesaurus/terms/1430>. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2018.
FOX, M. J. Prototype Theory: an Alternative Concept Theory for Categorizing Sex and Gender? Knowledge Organization, v. 38, n. 4, p. 328-334, 2011.
______. Subjects in Doubt: The Ontogeny of Intersex in the Dewey decimal classification. Knowledge Organization, v. 43, n. 8, p. 581-593, 2016.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
HART, C. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Londres: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2009. Disponível em: <http://doi.org/10.1080/01422419908228843>. Acesso em 05 abr. 2018.
HJORLAND, B. Concept Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, p. 1519-1536, 2009.
HOUAISS, A., VILLAR, M. de S. & FRANCO, F: M. de M. Dicionário da língua portuguesa. Temas e debates: Lisboa. 3º vol., 2003.
KWASNIK, B. H. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge: representation and discovery. Library Trends, v. 48, n. 1, p. 22- 47, 1999.
LOR, P. J. Revitalizing comparative library and information science: theory and metatheory. Journal of Documentation, v. 70, n. 1, p. 25-51, 2014. Disponível em: . Acesso em 07 abr. 2018.
¬¬______. Towards excellence in international and comparative research in library and information science. World Library and Information Congress: 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2012/105-lor-en.pdf>. Acesso em 05 abr. 2018.
MAIA, R. L. (coord.). Dicionário de sociologia. Porto: Porto Editora. 2002.
MANIEZ, J. Los lenguajes documentales y de classificación: concepción, construcción y utilización en los sistemas documentales. Madrid: Fundación Germán Sanchez Ruipérez, 1992.
MCILWAINE, I. C. Guía para el uso de la CDU. Madrid: AFNOR, 2003.
MORÁN SUÁREZ, M. A.; RODRÍGUEZ BRAVO, B. La imagen de la mujer en la Clasificación Decimal Universal (CDU). In: 5º Congreso Isko-España: la Representación y Organización del Conocimiento: Metodologías, Modelos y Aplicaciones. Alcalá de Henares (Madrid): Facultad de Documentación, 2001.
OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER, INC. Dewey Decimal Classification® (DDC®) summaries: A briefintroduction to the Dewey Decimal Classification system. 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.oclc.org/en/dewey/features/summaries.html#dev>. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2018.
OLSON, H. A. How we construct subjects: A feminist analysis. Library trend. v. 56, n. 2, p. 509-541, 2007.
______. Sameness and difference: a cultural foundation of classification. Library resources & technical services, v. 45, p. 115-122, 2011.
PICKARD, A. J. Research Methods in Information. London: Facet Publ, 2013.
SIMÕES, M. G. Classificações bibliográficas: percurso de uma teoria. Coimbra: Almedina, 2011.
ZINS, CH.; SANTOS, P. L. V. A. C. Mapping the Knowledge Covered by Library Classification Systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 62, n. 5, p. 877-901, 2011.
TAYLOR, A. G.; JOUDREY, D. N. The organization of information. 3rd ed. Westport, London: Libraries Unlimited, 2009.
UDCC UNIVERSAL DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION CONSORTIUM. Universal Decimal Classification., 2018. Disponível em: < http://www.udcc.org/>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2018.
______. Universal Decimal Classification Summary, 2018a. Disponível em: <http://www.udcsummary.info/>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria da Graça Simões, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Olívia Pestana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant Liinc em Revista the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their manuscripts and versios of record (VoR) in their personal web pages or institutional repositories, generic repositories etc., before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication in Liinc em Revista, according to its open access depositing policy registered in the Directory of Editorial Policies of Brazilian Journals (DIADORIM), kindly providing a link to the article published on Liinc's website.
Liinc em Revista, published by Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – CC BY 4.0