Rethink the political public sphere considering the Echo Chambers: concepts and methodological issues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v18i2.6067Keywords:
Echo chambers, Political public sphere, Social media platformsAbstract
The objective of this article is to conceptualize Echo Chambers from a literature review and to present its methodological implications for studies on the political public sphere in social network platforms. An echo chamber is a social epistemic structure in which relevant voices are actively excluded and discredited by creating ambiences of homophily. This homophily is shown when users of social networking platforms interact and associate only with similar ones, with selective exposure to content. It is associated with processes of evasion, questioning and constant search for reinforcement. This translates into the tendency to consume information aligned with previously constituted ideologies only with confirmation bias, and in the propensity to seek, choose and interpret information aligned with one's own belief system, including news that does not match reality. We conclude that it is important to untangle algorithm and user in strategies that consider the dimensions of platform technology, the communicative process of conversation and deliberation, and its concrete effects in the political sphere. Another important factor is the identification and objective delimitation of which are the homophilic patterns present in certain groups on the platforms
References
AZAMBUJA, Darcy, 2005. A opinião pública. In: Introdução à ciência política. São Paulo: Globo. pp. 259–263.
BOYD, danah, 2011. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In: PAPACHARISSI, Zizi (org.), A Networked Self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. Nova York: Routledge. pp. 39–58.
DAHLBERG, Lincoln, 2018. Visibility and the Public Sphere: A Normative Conceptualisation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418818. Online. 3 abril 2018. Vol. 25, no. 1–2, pp. 35–42. [Acesso em 29 Jul. 2022]. DOI 10.1080/13183222.2018.1418818.
DEL VALLE, Marc Esteve, SIJTSMA, Rimmert, STEGEMAN, Hanne e BORGE, Rosa, 2020. Online Deliberation and the Public Sphere: Developing a Coding Manual to Assess Deliberation in Twitter Political Networks. Javnost - The Public. Online. 2 Jul. 2020. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 211–229. [Acesso em 17 Jul. 2022]. DOI 10.1080/13183222.2020.1794408.
DIJCK, José van, POELL, Thomas e WAAL, Martijn de, 2018. The Platform Society: public values in a connective world. Nova York: Oxford University Press.
FRASER, Nancy, 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text. Online. 1990. No. 25/26, pp. 56. [Acesso em 26 Jul. 2022]. DOI 10.2307/466240.
FRIEDLAND, Lewis A., HOVE, Thomas B. e ROJAS, Hernando, 2014. The Networked Public Sphere. Javnost - The Public. Online. 2014. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 5–26. [Accessed 22 July 2022]. DOI 10.1080/13183222.2006.11008922.
GILLESPIE, Tarleton, 2012. The relevance of algorithm. In: GILLESPIE, T., BOCZKOWSKI, P. e FOOT, K. (orgs.), Media Technologies. Online. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Disponível em: http://www.tarletongillespie.org/essays/Gillespie - The Relevance of Algorithms.pdf
GOMES, Wilson, 2006. Apontamentos sobre o conceito de esfera pública política. In: MAIA, Rousiley e CASTRO, Maria Ceres P. (orgs.), Mídia, esfera pública e identidades coletivas. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG. pp. 49–62.
HABERMAS, Jürgen, 2003. Mudança estrutural da Esfera Pública: investigações quanto a uma categoria da sociedade burguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.
HABERMAS, Jürgen, 2006. Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory. Online. 1 Nov. 2006. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 411–426. [Acesso em 29 Jul. 2022]. DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2885.2006.00280.X.
LEWANDOWSKY, Stephan, SMILLIE, Laura, GARCIA, David, HERTWIG, Ralph, WEATHERALL, Jim, EGIDY, Stepahnie e ROBERTSON, Ronald E., 2020. Algorithmic content curation. In: LEWANDOWSKY, S. e SMILLIE, L. (orgs.), Technology and Democracy: Understanding the influence of online technologies on political behaviour and decision-making. Luxemburgo: EUR 30422 EN: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-76-24088-4.
NGUYEN, C. Thi, 2020. Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme. Online. 1 Jun. 2020. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–161. [Acesso em 26 Set. 2021]. DOI 10.1017/EPI.2018.32.
POELL, Thomas, NIEBORG, David e DIJCK, José van, 2020. Plataformização. Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos. Online. 4 Abr. 2020. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 2–10. [Acesso em 5 Dez. 2021]. DOI 10.4013/fem.2020.221.01.
ROUVROY, Antoinette e BERNS, Thomas, 2018. Governamentalidade algorítmica e perspectivas de emancipação: o díspar como condição de individualização pela relação? In: BRUNO, Fernanda, CARDOSO, Bruno, KANASHIRO, Marta, GUILHON, Luciana e MELGAÇO, Lucas (orgs.), Tecnopolíticas da Vigilância: perspectivas da margem. São Paulo: Boitempo. pp. 107–140.
SILVEIRA, Sergio Amadeu da, 2017. Tudo sobre tod@s: redes digitais, privacidade e venda de dados pessoais. São Paulo: Edições Sesc São Paulo.
SUNSTEIN, Cass R., 2017. #Republic : divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
TERREN, Ludovic e BORGE-BRAVO, Rosa, 2021. Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research. Online. 2021. Vol. 9, pp. 99–118. [Acesso em 26 Set. 2021]. Disponível em: https://rcommunicationr.org/index.php/rcr/article/view/94
YARCHI, Moran, BADEN, Christian e KLIGLER-VILENCHIK, Neta, 2020. Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication. Online. 2020. pp. 1–42. [Acesso em 17 Jul. 2022]. DOI 10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sérgio Rodrigo da Silva Ferreira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant Liinc em Revista the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their manuscripts and versios of record (VoR) in their personal web pages or institutional repositories, generic repositories etc., before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication in Liinc em Revista, according to its open access depositing policy registered in the Directory of Editorial Policies of Brazilian Journals (DIADORIM), kindly providing a link to the article published on Liinc's website.
Liinc em Revista, published by Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – CC BY 4.0