Informática nos tribunais e a teoria do risco global
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v1i2.193Keywords:
Science, Technique and modernity, Global risk society, Courts informatization, Ulrich Beck, Reflexive modernityAbstract
This paper aims to establish an interface between the concern that involves the inherent dangers of informatics resources applied to courts and modern social risk theory. Admitting Brazilian courts informatization as a phenomenon of our time, our intent is to contextualize risk as much more than a transversal concern, but a paradigm of our days, once adopted the reflexive modernity concept as conceived by Ulrich Beck, where the trust and social aggregation bonds (specially Giddens’s expert systems) melt. An analysis is specially made about the global risks to
which we are exposed while dedicating part of our collective relations administration to computer resources, virtual resources (with emphasis on a paper by Josh Van Loon).
References
ADAM, B.; BECK, U.; VAN LOON, J. (Org.) The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Londres: Sage, 2000.
BAKER, T. Risk. Insurance, and the social construction of responsibility. In: BAKER, T.; SIMON, J. (Org.). Embracing risk: the changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
BAKER, T.; SIMON, J. (Org.). Embracing risk: the changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
BECK, U. Risk society revisited: theory, politics and research programmes. In: ADAM, B.; BECK, U.; LOON, J. Van (Org.) The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Londres: Sage, 2000.
______. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Londres: Sage, 1992.
BECK, U.; ZOLO, D. La società globale del rischio: una discussione fra Ulrich Beck e Danilo Zolo. Swif: sito web italiano per la filosofia, 1999. Disponível em: http://lgxserver.uniba.it/lei/filpol/zolobeck.htm. Acesso: 12 mar. 2004.
BENTHAM, G. Uma introdução aos princípios da moral e da legislação. São Paulo: Abril, 1979.
DESCARTES, R. Discurso sobre o método. In: DESCARTES. São Paulo: Nova Cultural., 1996. (Coleção Os Pensadores).
______. Meditações metafísicas. In: DESCARTES. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1996. (Coleção Os Pensadores).
DESEMBARGADOR reconhece falhas diárias no sistema do TJ. Jornal Do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 30 abr. 2004. Caderno 1, p. A2.
DOUGLAS, M. Purity and danger. Nova York: Routledge, 2002.
DOUGLAS, M.; WILDAVSKY, A. Risk and culture. Los Angeles: University of Califórnia Press, 1982.
EWALD, François. The return of Descartes’s malicious demon: an outline of a philosopy of precaution. In: BAKER, T.; SIMON, J. (Org.). Embracing risk: the changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
FONTAINHA, F. C. Discutindo a informatização do processo no contexto do acesso e administração da justiça: o pioneirismo do TRF3. Mundo Jurídico, [Rio de Janeiro]. Disponível em: http://www.mundojuridico.adv.br/html/artigos/documentos/texto190.htm. Consulta em: 3 ago. 2003.
GIDDENS, A. As conseqüências da modernidade. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp, 1990.
______. Modernidade e identidade. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar, 2002.
LOON, J. V. Virtual risks in the age of cybernetic reproduction. In: ADAM, B.; BECK, U.;
LOON, J. Van (Org.) The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Londres: Sage, 2000.
ROSE, H. Risk, trust and scepticism in the age of the new genetics. In: ADAM, B.; BECK, U. LOON, J. Van (Org.) The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Londres: Sage, 2000.
ROSE, N. At risk of madness. In: BAKER, T.; SIMON, J. (Org.). Embracing risk: the changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
SINGER, P. Animal liberation. Nova York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002.
WEBER, M. A “objetividade” do conhecimento nas ciências sociais. In: COHN, G. (Org.). Weber. São Paulo: Ática. 1991. (Coleção Grandes Cientistas Sociais).
______. Ciência e política: duas vocações. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2002.
______. Economia y sociedad. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1944. v. 1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roberto Fragale, Fernando de Castro Fontainha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant Liinc em Revista the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their manuscripts and versios of record (VoR) in their personal web pages or institutional repositories, generic repositories etc., before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication in Liinc em Revista, according to its open access depositing policy registered in the Directory of Editorial Policies of Brazilian Journals (DIADORIM), kindly providing a link to the article published on Liinc's website.
Liinc em Revista, published by Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – CC BY 4.0 
