INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INNOVATION, AND THE SPINNER MODEL IN AGRIBUSINESS
A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21721/p2p.2023v9n2.p134-152Keywords:
Intellectual Property, Innovation, Spinner model, AgribusinessAbstract
Downloads
References
ACEMOGLU, D. et al. Transition to Clean Technology. Journal of Political Economy, v. 124, n. 1, 2016.
AGUIAR, M. E. A. et al. GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION OF THE COCOA FROM TOMÉ-AÇU AS INDUCTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND PROTECTION OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional, v. 17, n. 3, p. 100–113, 2021.
ALMEIDA, P. R. DE. Propriedade intelectual: os novos desafios para a América Latina. Estudos Avançados, v. 5, n. 12, p. 187–203, 1991.
ANDRADE, D. S.; TELLES, T. S.; CASTRO, G. H. L. The Brazilian microalgae production chain and alternatives for its consolidation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20 mar. 2019.
ARAÚJO, E. F. et al. Propriedade intelectual: Proteção e gestão estratégica do conhecimento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, n. SUPPL. 1, p. 1–10, 2010.
ASSAY, B. E. Intellectual Property Rights and the Protection of Africa’s Traditional Knowledge. Em: African Studies: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice. Ogwashi-Uku, Nigeria: IGI Global, 2020. p. 424–447.
BARBOSA, J. G. P. et al. A INFLUÊNCIA DA INOVAÇÃO TECNOLÓGICA E ORGANIZACIONAL NO CRESCIMENTO DE EMPRESAS BRASILEIRAS. Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation, v. 10, n. 1, p. 124–143, 2022.
BASSO, M. A tutela Constitucional da Propriedade Intelectual. Revista de Informação Legislativa, v. 45, n. 179, p. 39–41, 2008.
BROADUS, R. N. DEFINITION OF “BIBLIOMETRICS”. Scientometrics, v. 12, n. 5–6, p. 373–379, 1987.
CAMARGO, M. E. et al. PROSPECÇÃO TECNOLÓGICA SOBRE AGRICULTURA NO BRASIL. Em: PRIESNITZ, M. C. et al. (Eds.). Propriedade intelectual, tecnologias e inovação. Aracju: Associação Acadêmica de Propriedade Intelectual, 2018. p. 61–81.
CIASULLO, M. V.; MONTERA, R.; DOUGLAS, A. Building SMEs’ resilience in times of uncertainty: the role of big data analytics capability and co-innovation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, v. 16, n. 2, p. 203–217, 6 abr. 2022.
CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed/Bookman, 2007.
CUERVA, M. C.; TRIGUERO-CANO, Á.; CÓRCOLES, D. Drivers of green and non-green innovation: Empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 68, p. 104–113, 1 abr. 2014.
DONATO, H.; DONATO, M. Etapas na Condução de uma Revisão Sistemática. Acta Medica Portuguesa, v. 32, n. 3, p. 227–235, 1 mar. 2019.
FIGUEIREDO, R. et al. The role of knowledge intensive business services in economic development: A bibliometric analysis from Bradford, Lotka and Zipf laws. Gest. Prod., v. 26, n. 4, p. 1–12, 2019.
FIGUEIREDO, R. et al. Innovation and co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: the Spinner model. Business Process Management Journal, v. 26, n. 4, p. 909–923, 13 ago. 2020.
FIGUEIREDO, R.; FERREIRA, J. J. DE M. Spinner Model: Prediction of Propensity to Innovate Based on Knowledge-Intensive Business Services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1316–1335, 1 dez. 2019.
GIL, A. C. Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2018.
GÜNTHER, H. Pesquisa Qualitativa Versus Pesquisa Quantitativa: Esta é a Questão? Psic.: Teor. e Pesq., v. 22, n. 2, p. 201–210, 2006.
HERSCOVICI, A. Informação, conhecimento e Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual: os limites dos mecanismos de mercado e das modalidades de negociação privada. Economia e Sociedade, v. 21, n. 3, p. 667–694, 2012.
HIGGINS, J. P.; GREEN, S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. updated Sep 2006 ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006. v. 4
HIGGINS, J. P. T. et al. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). [s.l.] Cochrane Methods, fev. 2022.
HOLGERSSON, M.; GRANSTRAND, O.; BOGERS, M. The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes. Long Range Planning, v. 51, n. 2, p. 303–319, 2018.
KAMP, C. O. DEN; HUNTER, D. A HISTORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN 50 OBJECTS. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
KUBOTA, L. C. As Kibs e a inovação tecnológica das firmas de serviços. Economia e Sociedade, v. 18, n. 2, p. 349–369, ago. 2009.
LAKATOS, E. M.; MARCONI, M. DE A. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.
MACHADO JUNIOR, C. et al. As Leis da Bibliometria em Diferentes Bases de Dados Científicos. Revista de Ciências da Administração, v. 18, n. 44, p. 111–123, 25 abr. 2016.
MASCARENHAS NETO, A. T.; CAMARGO, M. E. Intellectual Property and Innovation as a Way to Enable Technological Development in the Agribusiness Sector: a meta-analysis. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, v. 9, n. 10, p. 183–196, 2021.
MOHER, D. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 151, n. 4, p. 264–270, 2009.
OLIVEIRA, B. B. DE; OLIVEIRA, E. F. DE. Inovação Tecnológica e Desenvolvimento no Brasil Sob a Perspectiva Constitucional. Revista de Direito, Inovação, Propriedade Intelectual e Concorrência, v. 5, n. 2, p. 23–44, 2019.
PARISI, C.; VIGANI, M.; RODRÍGUEZ-CEREZO, E. Agricultural nanotechnologies: What are the current possibilities? Nano Today, v. 10, n. 2, p. 124–127, 2015.
PILKINGTON, A.; MEREDITH, J. The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management-1980-2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, v. 27, n. 3, p. 185–202, jun. 2009.
RIERA, R.; ABREU, M. M.; CICONELLI, R. M. Revisões Sistemáticas e Metanálises na Reumatologia Systematic Review and Meta-analyses Rheumatology. Rev Bras Reumatol, v. 46, n. supl. 1, p. 8–11, 2006.
SCHNEIDER, J. W.; BORLUND, P. Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: Methodical considerations. Journal of Documentation, v. 60, n. 5, p. 524–549, 2004.
SECLEN-LUNA, J. P.; MOYA-FERNÁNDEZ, P. Exploring the relationship between KIBS co-locations and the innovativeness of manufacturing firms in Latin America. Investigaciones Regionales, v. 2020, n. 48, p. 69–84, 2020.
SERPE, L. F.; KANIAK, V. M. M. A GESTÃO DA INOVAÇÃO EM PME’S E SUAS PERSPECTIVAS ATUAIS: UM ESTUDO DE META-SÍNTESE. Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation, v. 9, n. 1, p. 165–192, 1 set. 2021.
SOUZA, F. E.; NARCIZO, R. B. UM MODELO CONCEITUAL PARA A RELAÇÃO ENTRE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO E GESTÃO DA INOVAÇÃO. Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation, v. 9, n. 3, p. 12–28, 2022.
SYROMYATNIKOV, D. et al. Agile supply chain management in agricultural business. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 9, n. 3, p. 377–383, 2020.
VEIGA, P. M. et al. The spinner innovation model: understanding the knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and innovation process in SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, v. 27, n. 2, p. 590–614, 5 mar. 2021.
VIEIRA, A. C. P.; BRUCH, K. L. 20 years later: what has changed in the Brazilian seed market with the Plant Variety Protection Law. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, v. 10, n. 4, p. 327, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 09/05/2023 (2)
- 28/03/2023 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 P2P & INOVAÇÃO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal is published under the Creative Commons - Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Brazil.
The published work is considered collaboration and therefore the author will not receive any remuneration for this as well as anything will be charged in exchange for publication.
All texts are responsibility of the authors.
It’s allowed partial or total reproduction of the texts of the magazine since the source is cited.
