Informative architectures and citizen participation: a comparative study between the digital platforms Decidim and Rousseau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v18i2.6058Palavras-chave:
plataformas digitais, cidadania digital, democracia participativa, ativismo digital, design de interface, digital platformsResumo
To what extent does the way in which digital platforms are organized favor citizen participation? This article looks at this question using a comparative study between two digital informative architectures: the Five Star Movement’s (originally in Italian “Movimento 5 Stelle”) Rousseau platform in Italy, and the Decidim platform, developed after the 15M movement in Spain by a collaboration of entities from different countries. From a qualitative analysis of its architectures – in accordance with an approach based mainly on communication theory – we sought to investigate and describe the ways in which information circulates and operates, and the possibilities they offer for democratic actions. This was accomplished by analyzing two aspects of the platform: 1) the conception and development of codes; 2) the functions that the platform offers and its interaction with users. In this paper, we start from the central hypothesis that the communication conditions act as a base for the quality and levels of participation. Just as more verticalized communicative structures (such as those of traditional mass media) tend to concentrate decision-making processes and power, more horizontalized structures end up favoring more collaborative and democratic actions: thus, we aimed to verify the extent to which the modes of elaboration and organization of information on these platforms, operating in digital network contexts, enable broad and effective modalities of citizen action
Referências
ACCOTO, Cosimo, 2018. In data time and tide: a surprising philosophical guide to our programmable future. Milano: Bocconi University Press.
ARENDT, Hannah, 2018. [1958]. The human condition. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ARNSTEIN, Sherry R., 1969. A ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of The American Institute of Planners, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 216-224. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
BARTLETT, Lesley e VAVRUS, Frances, 2017. Comparative case studies. Educação & Realidade, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 899-920. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623668636
BECKER, Howard, 2009. How to find out how to do qualitative research. International Journal of Communication, vol. 3, p. 545-553. Retrieved from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/550/329
BRATTON, Benjamin, 2016. The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
CASTELLS, Manuel, 2007. Communication, power and counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, vol.1, no. 1, p. 238-266. Retrieved from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/46
COTTA, Maurizio, 2020. The anti-establishment parties at the helm: From great hopes to failure and a limited resurrection. Contemporary Italian Politics, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 126-139. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2020.1744894
COZZAGLIO, Ilaria, 2020. Can realism save us from populism? Rousseau in the digital age. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 278-298. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120906928
DE BLASIO, Emiliana e VIVIANI, Lorenzo, 2020. Platform party between digital activism and hyper-leadership: The reshaping of the public sphere. Media and Communication, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 16-27. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3230
DESERIIS, Marco, 2017. Direct parliamentarianism: An analysis of the political values embedded in Rousseau, the “operating system” of the Five Star Movement. JeDEM – eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 47-67. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v9i2.471
DESERIIS, Marco, 2020a. Digital movement parties: A comparative analysis of the technopolitical cultures and the participation platforms of the Movimento 5 Stelle and the Piratenpartei. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 23, no. 12, p. 1770-1786. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1631375
DESERIIS, Marco, 2020b. Two variants of the digital party: The platform party and the networked party. Partecipazione e Conflitto, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 896-917. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i1p896
DI FELICE, Massimo, 2017. Net-attivismo: Dall'azione all'atto connettivo. Roma: Edizione Estemporanee.
DI FELICE, Massimo, 2016. Paysages post-urbains: La fin de l'expérience urbaine et les formes communicatives de l'habiter. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
DI FELICE, Massimo, 2014. La qualité de l'action net-activiste. Sociétés, vol. 124, no. 2, p. 21-35. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3917/soc.124.0021
DI FELICE, Massimo, 2019. La cittadinanza digitale: La crisi dell’idea occidentale di democrazia e la partecipazione nelle reti digitali. Roma: Meltemi.
ESPOSITO, Roberto, 2006. Communitas: origine e destino della comunità. Torino: Einaudi.
FLICK, Uwe, 2002. Qualitative research: state of the art. Social Science Information, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 5-24. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0539018402041001001
FLORIDI, Luciano, 2014. The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FLUSSER, Vilém, 1985. Filosofia da caixa preta: Ensaios para uma futura filosofia da fotografia. São Paulo: Hucitec.
FLUSSER, Vilém, 2007. O mundo codificado: Por uma filosofia do design e da comunicação [1972]. Trad. Raquel Abi-Sâmara. Org. Rafael Cardoso. São Paulo: CosacNaify.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor, 2019. Ciudadanos reemplazados por algoritmos. Guadalajara: CALAS.
GERBAUDO, Paolo, 2019. The digital party: Political organisation and online democracy. London: Pluto Press.
GOULART, Mayra e ADINOLFI, Goffredo, 2018. O desafio populista à democracia representativa: A Venezuela chavista e o MoVimento 5 Estrelas. Análise Social, vol. 53, no. 227, p. 388-414. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.31447/as00032573.2018227.06
LASSWELL, Harold D., 1948. The structure and function of communication in society. Em: L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas, p. 37-51. New York: Harper and Row.
LATOUR, Bruno, 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LAZARSFELD, Paul e MERTON, Robert, 1948. Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. Em: L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas, p. 95-118. New York: Harper and Row.
McCOMBS, Maxwell, 1981. Setting the agenda for agenda-setting research: an assessment of the priority ideas and problems. Em: G. Wilhoit (Ed.), Mass Communication Review Yearbook, vol. 2, p. 209-211. Sage.
MEYROWITZ, Joshua, 1986. No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MOROSINI, Marco, 2019. Italie: le techno-populisme au pouvoir. Revue Projet, vol. 368, no. 1, p. 82-88. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3917/pro.368.0082
MOSCA, Lorenzo, 2020. Democratic vision and online participatory spaces in the Italian Movimento 5 Stelle. Acta politica, vol. 55, no. 1, p. 1-18. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0096-y
MUSSO, Marta e MACCAFERRI, Marzia, 2018. At the origins of the political discourse of the 5-Star Movement (M5S): Internet, direct democracy and the “future of the past”. Internet Histories, vol. 2, no. 1-2, p. 98-120. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2018.1457295
O'NEIL, Cathy (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
PARISER, Eli, 2011. The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin.
PITTÈRI, Daniele, 2007. Democrazia elettronica. Itália: Editori Laterza.
POELL, Thomas, NIEBORG, David e VAN DIJCK, José, 2019. Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 1-13. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
ROMANCINI, Richard, 2020. Paolo Gerbaudo: A mídia digital e as transformações no ativismo e na política contemporânea. MATRIZes, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 109-122. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v14i1p109-122
SANTINI, Rose Marie e CARVALHO, Hanna, 2019. Plataformas online de participação cidadã: meta-síntese e avaliação crítica de seus impactos sociais e politicos. Comunicação e Sociedade, vol. 36, p. 163-182. Retrieved from: http://journals.openedition.org/cs/2083
STOCKMAN, Caroline e SCALIA, Vincenzo, 2020. Democracy on the five star movement’s Rousseau platform. European Politics and Society, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 603-617. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1705564
TUCHMAN, Gaye, 1978. Making News: a study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
VAN DIJCK, José, POELL, Thomas e DE WAAL, Martijn, 2018. The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
VAN DIJCK, José, 2020. Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society, vol. 23, no. 9, p. 2801-2819. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820940293
VATTIMO, Gianni, 2004. Postmodernidad. Em: A. Ortiz-Osés, & P. Lanceros (Eds.). Diccionario de Hermenéutica. Una obra interdisciplinar para las ciencias humanas, p. 640-646. 3. ed. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
VITTORI, Davide, 2020. Membership and members’ participation in new digital parties: Bring back the people? Comparative European Politics, vol. 18, p. 609-629. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00201-5
WEBB, Amy, 2019. The big nine: How the tech titans and their thinking machines could warp humanity. New York: PublicAffairs.
WOLF, Mauro, 1985. Teorie delle comunicazioni di massa. Milano: Bompiani.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Eli Borges Junior, Bruno Madureira Ferreira
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam na Liinc em Revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Consulte a Política de Acesso Livre e Autoarquivamento para informações permissão de depósitos de versões pré-print de manuscritos e artigos submetidos ou publicados à/pela Liinc em Revista.
Liinc em Revista, publicada pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, é licenciada sob os termos da Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional – CC BY 4.0 
