Pseudonyms of women authors, contingency and their social protagonism
FRAD, FRSAD and Subject Representation in Online Catalogs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v14i2.4474Keywords:
Conceptual model, FRAD, FRSAD, Pseudonyms, Subject representation, Social protagonismAbstract
This paper aims to present perspectives regarding subject representation of pseudonyms of women authors, who especially between the early nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries, chose or were forced to sign their works with male or ambiguous names. Considering that library catalogs must promote visibility to subject representation of women author’s pseudonyms, this exploratory and qualitative research highlights statements from the conceptual models Functional requirements for authority data, Functional requirements for subject authority data, and the knowledge organization literature to put forward a discussion regarding social issues conveyed by a name assigned to a bibliographic record. Applied examples from the Name Authority Headings of the Library of Congress and the Brazilian National Library are discussed, and the social protagonism which these records can embody is also highlighted.
References
BUONOCORE, Domingo. Diccionario de Bibliotecologia. 2. ed. aum. Buenos Aires: Marymar, 1976.
CINTRA, Anna Maria Marques. Estratégias de leitura em documentação. In: SMIT, Johanna W. (Coord.). Análise documentária: a análise da síntese. 2. ed. Brasília: IBICT, 1989. p. 30-37.
COSTA, Camila. As autoras que tiveram de usar pseudônimos masculinos – e agora serão lidas com seus nomes verdadeiros. BBC Brasil, São Paulo, abril 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 set. 2018.
DECLARAÇÃO de Princípios Internacionais de Catalogação. [S.l.]: IFLA, 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 jul. 2018.
D’ERCOLE, Isabella. Livros de mulheres que assinaram com pseudônimos masculinos são relançados. Geledes: Instituto da Mulher Negra, São Paulo, abril 2018. Seção Questão de gênero. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 set. 2018.
DEZ autoras que publicavam sob pseudônimos masculinos. Revista Cult, São Paulo, abril 2018. Seção Livros. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 set. 2018.
DOBRESKI, Brian; KWAŚNIK, Barbara. Changing depictions of persons in library practice: spirits, pseudonyms, and human books. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 44, n. 8, p. 656-667, 2017.
DRABINSKI, Emily. Queering the catalog: queer theory and the politics of correction. Library Quarterly, Chicago, v. 83, n. 2, p. 94-111, 2013.
GARRIDO ARILLA, María Rosa. Teoría e historia de la catalogación de documentos. Madrid: Síntesis, 1999.
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS. Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. München: K.G. Saur, 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 20 ago. 2018.
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: final report. 1998. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 ago. 2018.
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data: A conceptual model. Netherlands: IFLA, 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 20 ago. 2018.
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS. Guidelines for authority records and references. 2. ed. revised by the IFLA Working Group on GARE Revision. München: K.G. Saur, 2001. Disponível em:
. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2018.
MELO, Maria Antônia Fonseca; BRÄSCHER, Marisa. Requisitos Funcionais para Dados de Autoridade Assunto (FRSAD): entidades, atributos e relacionamentos. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas, v. 12, n. 2, p.102-119, 2014.
MEY, Eliane Serrão Alves. Introdução à catalogação. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 1995.
MILANI, Suellen Oliveira; PINHO, Fabio Assis. Knowledge representation and orthophemism: a reflection aiming to a concept. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 39, n. 5, p. 384-393, 2012.
MOULAISON, Heather Lea; DYKAS, Felicity; BUDD, John M. Foucault, the author, and intellectual debt: capturing the author-function through attributes, relationships, and events in knowledge organization systems. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 41, n. 1, p. 30-43, 2014.
OLSON, Hope Alene; SCHLEGL, Rose. Standardization, objectivity, and user focus: a meta-analysis of subject access critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, New York, v. 32, n. 2, p. 61-80, 2001.
OLSON, Hope Alene. The power to name: locating the limits or subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2002.
ORIGINAL Writers Project. Disponível em: . Acesso em:
ORTEGA, Cristina Dotta; LARA, Marilda Lópes Ginez de. A noção de estrutura e os registros de informação dos sistemas documentários. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 22, n. 1, p. 7-18, 2010.
ROBITAILLE, Isabelle. Book review: International Encyclopedia of Pseudonyms. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 3, n. 1, p. 60-61, 2006.
SOUSA, Brisa Pozzi de; SALDANHA, Gustavo Silva; TOLENTINO, Vinicius de Souza. Possibilidades reflexivas sobre gênero na estruturação do ponto de acesso na Catalogação: entre a delimitação das regras e a amplitude da representação. In: PINHO, Fabio Assis;
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves (Org.). Memória, tecnologia e cultura na organização do conhecimento. Recife: Ed. UFPE, 2017. p. 325-333. (Estudos Avançados em Organização do Conhecimento, 4).
SZOSTAK, Rick A pluralistic approach to the philosophy of classification. Library Trends, Baltimore, v. 63, n. 3, p. 591-614, 2015.
TENNIS, Joseph T. Ethos and Ideology of Knowledge Organization: Toward Precepts for an Engaged Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 40, n. 1, p. 42-49, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suellen Oliveira Milani, Brisa Pozzi de Sousa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant Liinc em Revista the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors have permission and are encouraged to deposit their manuscripts and versios of record (VoR) in their personal web pages or institutional repositories, generic repositories etc., before (pre-print) or after (post-print) the publication in Liinc em Revista, according to its open access depositing policy registered in the Directory of Editorial Policies of Brazilian Journals (DIADORIM), kindly providing a link to the article published on Liinc's website.
Liinc em Revista, published by Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – CC BY 4.0 
