Análise Crítica Semiótica e Economia Política Cultural

Autores/as

  • Bob Jessop University of Lancaster. Lancaster, Reino Unido.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v6i2.379

Resumen

Defendo aqui a idéia de uma “Economia Política Cultural” (“Cultural Political Economy” - CPE), explorando o papel constitutivo da semiose nas atividades econômicas e políticas, nas instituições econômicas e políticas, e na ordem social em geral. A abordagem da CPE é pós-disciplinária: ela adota a “virada cultural” na pesquisa econômica e política, sem descuidar da articulação entre a semiose e as materialidades interconectadas da econômica e da política, dentro de formações sociais mais amplas. Essa abordagem é ilustrada pela emergência da Economia baseada em Conhecimento (“Knowledge-Based Economy” - KBE), enquanto discurso-mestre tanto das estratégias de acumulação em diferentes escalas, dos projetos de estado e visões hegemônicas, e dos diversos sistemas funcionais e profissões, quanto da sociedade civil.

 

 

Biografía del autor/a

  • Bob Jessop, University of Lancaster. Lancaster, Reino Unido.

     

     

Referencias

Archer, M. S. (2000). Being Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bayart, J. F. (1994). L’invention paradoxale de la mode économique. In idem (Ed.). La réinvention du capitalisme. Paris: Éditions Karthala. PAGES 9-43.

Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel ésprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.

Campbell, D. T. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems, 14, 69-86.

Daly, G. (1991). The discursive construction of economic space. Economy and Society, 20 (1): 79-102.

Debray, R. (1973). Prison Writings. (R. Sheed, Trans.). London: Allen Lane.

Du Gay, P. and Pryke, R. (Eds.). (2002). Cultural Economy. London: Sage.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N., Jessop, B., & Sayer, A. (2003). Critical realism and semiosis. In J.M. Roberts and J. Joseph (Eds.). Realism, Discourse and Deconstruction. London: Routledge. PAGES 23-42.

Gal, S. (1989). Language and political economy. American Review of Anthropology, 18: 345-367.

Grabher, G. (1994). Lob der Verschwendung. Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung: ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

Graham, P. and Fairclough, N. (2000). Marx and discourse analysis: genesis of a critical method. Estudios de Sociolingüística, 3 (1), 185-229.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. (Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith, Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Hay, C. (1996). Narrating crisis: the discursive construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent’. Sociology, 30 (2), 253-277.

Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. Cambridge: Polity.

Jessop, B. (2001). Capitalism, the regulation approach, and critical realism. In A. Brown et al. (Eds.), Critical Realism and Marxism. London: Routledge. PAGES 88-115.

Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.

Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and meta-governance. On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as Social and Political Communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press. PAGES 101-116.

Jessop, B. and Sum, N.-L. (2000). An entrepreneurial city in action. Urban Studies, 37 (12), 2290-2315.

Jessop, B. and Sum, N.-L. (2001). Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives in political economy. New Political Economy, 6 (1): 89-101.

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.

Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1994). Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.

Malpas, J. and Wickham G. (1995). Governance and failure: on the limits of sociology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31 (3): 37-50.

Marx, K. (1852/1996). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx: Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. PAGES 31-127.

Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1993). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19 (1): 1-31.

Milner, A. (2002). Re-imagining Cultural Studies. The Promise of Cultural Materialism. London: Routledge.

Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85 (1): 77-96.

Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.

Perez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Chelmsford: Edward Elgar.

Polanyi, K. (1982). The economy as instituted process. In M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg (Eds.). The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder: Westview. PAGES 29-51.

Porter, M. E. et al. (2000). The Global Competitiveness Report 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ray, L. and Sayer, A. (Eds.). (1999). Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn. London: Sage.

Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.

Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: a relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23, (4): 605-649.

Sum, N.-L. and Jessop, B. (forthcoming). The Economic Institutions of Culture: Towards a Cultural Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Telò, M. (2002). Governance and government in the European Union: the Open Method of Coordination. In M. J. Rodrigues (Ed.). The New Knowledge Economy in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. PAGES 242-272.

Wickham, G. (1987). Power and power analysis: beyond Foucault? Economy and Society, 12 (4), 468-498.

Williams, R. (1980). Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso.

World Economic Forum (2003). The Global Competitiveness Report 2002-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Publicado

29/09/2010

Número

Sección

Linguagem, Informação e novas dinâmicas sociais contemporâneas