Digital Sovereignty in times of AI: between perils of hegemonic agendas and possibilities of alternative approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v20i2.7312Palavras-chave:
digital sovereignty, popular digital sovereignty, sustainable digital sovereigntyResumo
Although it has been on the agenda for over a decade, the importance of digital sovereignty has recently increased. Nations-states worldwide have developed policies or expressed through speeches the need to safeguard their interests in the digital realm. The current technological frontier is artificial intelligence (AI). Hence, digital sovereignty agendas now encompass the complexities introduced by AI. This article explores contemporary discourses on digital sovereignty, highlighting how different ideological positions shape these conversations. Current discussions reveal a multifaceted field where sovereignty is interpreted through varied lenses, directly influencing the governance of technologies such as AI. Predominant perspectives often focus on state, market, or individual sovereignty over data, algorithms, and AI models. However, through document and discourse analysis, the article examines alternative approaches such as sustainable, grassroots, and feminist digital sovereignties and those led by communities or indigenous peoples. These visions challenge the mainstream by emphasizing autonomy, inclusion, and sustainability in managing critical AI resources, including computing, databases, data, and algorithm governance. By analyzing these approaches, the article identifies principles that can foster more diverse, democratic, and virtuous AI development. Finds points out that participatory governance and the development of emancipatory technologies are essential to navigating the ethical and practical issues that emerge at the intersection of digital sovereignty and AI. In a normative way, the article concludes by reflecting on how these alternative discourses can influence the future of AI, pointing to paths that could lead to a more inclusive and sovereign AI development aligned with collective and environmental values. Future research could explore how these sovereignty conceptions catalyze an AI's evolution to align with collective digital self-determination and more conscious and equitable resource management practices.
Referências
ADLER-NISSEN, Rebecca e GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN, Thomas (Hrsg.), 2008. Sovereignty Games. Palgrave Macmillan US. DOI 10.1057/9780230616936. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616936
ÁVILA, Renata, 2018. Digital sovereignty or digital colonialism? sur – international journal on human rights, 27. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://sur.conectas.org/en/digital-sovereignty-or-digital-colonialism/
BARBOSA, Alexandre, 2022. A soberania digital sustentável como base para o futuro da internet. Dossiê ComCiencia - LabJor Unicamp, no. 240. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.comciencia.br/a-soberania-digital-sustentavel-como-base-para-o-futuro-da-internet/
BELLI, Luca et al., 2023. Cybersecurity: a systemic view towards a regulatory proposal for a digitally sovereign Brazil. Center for Technology and Society, Fundação Getulio Vargas.
BELLI, Luca e HADZIC, S., 2023. Community networks: building digital sovereignty and environmental sustainability. Publicações Direito Rio.
BRIA, Francesca, 2015. Public policies for digital sovereignty. Platform Cooperativism workshop. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/19102224/Public_policies_for_digital_sovereignty
BUOLAMWINI, Joy e GEBRU, Timnit, 2018. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. PMLR Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 81, p. 1–15. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
CARANTO MORFORD, Abigail e ANSLOOS, Jeff, 2021. Indigenous sovereignty in digital territory: a qualitative study on land-based relations with #NativeTwitter. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 293–305. DOI 10.1177/11771801211019097. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211019097
CHANDER, Anupam e SUN, H., (Hrsg.), 2023. Data sovereignty: from the digital silk road to the return of the state. Oxford University Press.
COUTURE, Stéphanie e TOUPIN, Sophie, 2019. What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, vol. 21, no. 10, p. 2305–2322. DOI 10.1177/1461444819865984. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
DIVIACCHI, T., 2023. Indigenous data sovereignty and open data. PLOS Blogs EveryONE, 10 outubro 2023. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://everyone.plos.org/2023/10/10/indigenous-data-sovereignty-and-open-data
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman, 2003. Analysing discourse. London: Routledge.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman, 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
FRÖBEL, Franziska, CARINA, L., e JOOST, G., 2023. MINODU: fostering local sustainable development through technology and research. DOI 10.34669/WI.CP/4.17.
HACHÉ, Alexandra, 2014. Technological sovereignty. Em: Coredem (Hrsg.), For free information and open internet: independent journalists, community media and hacktivists take action. Ritimo. p. 165–171.
HERLO, Britta et al. (Hrsg.), 2021. Practicing sovereignty: digital involvement in times of crises. Bielefeld: transcript publishing. DOI 10.25932/PUBLISHUP-59513.
HERLO, Britta, ULLRICH, A., e VLADOVA, G., 2023. Sustainable digital sovereignty: interdependencies between sustainable digitalization and digital sovereignty. DOI 10.34669/WI.WS/32.
KEYSAR, H., CALDERÓN LÜNING, E., e UNTEIDIG, A., 2021. Prototyping digital sovereignty: experimenting with community wireless networking technology. Em: Practicing sovereignty: digital involvement in times of crises. transcript Verlag. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/media/pdf/66/b3/2a/oa9783839457603.pdf
KUKUTAI, Tahu e TAYLOR, John (Hrsg.), 2016. Indigenous data sovereignty. ANU Press. DOI 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.
LEHUEDÉ, Solana, 2024. An alternative planetary future? Digital sovereignty frameworks and the decolonial option. Big Data & Society, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 20539517231221778. DOI 10.1177/20539517231221778. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231221778
LITVINENKO, Anna, 2021. Re-defining borders online: Russia’s strategic narrative on internet sovereignty. Media and Communication, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 5–15. DOI 10.17645/mac.v9i4.4292. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4292
MAURO-FLUDE, Natalie, 2020. Performing with the aether. Em: Hjorth, L., DE S. E SILVA, A., e LANSON, K. (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to mobile media art. Routledge.
MAURO-FLUDE, Natalie, 2021. Writing the feminist internet: reimagining internet sovereignty as feminist laissez-faire. Performing the Onternet. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://networkcultures.org/performanceofcode/2021/07/07/writing-the-feminist-internet-reimagining-internet-sovereignty-as-feminist-laissez-faire/
MEINEL, Christoph, GALBAS, M., e HAGEBÖLLING, D., 2023. Digital sovereignty: insights from Germany’s education sector. Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam, no. 156. DOI 10.25932/PUBLISHUP-59513.
MEJIAS, Ulises, 2023. Sovereignty and its outsiders: data sovereignty, racism, and immigration control. DOI 10.34669/WI.WJDS/3.2.7.
MTST, 2023. MTST and its struggle for digital sovereignty. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://nucleodetecnologia.com.br/docs/Cartilha-MTSTec-ENG.pdf
OREMBO, Lillian, GILLWALD, Alison, e MAKUMBIROFA, Samuel, 2023. Feminist digital economy workshop. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://researchictafrica.net/publication/report-feminist-digital-economy-workshop/
PIERRI, Paula e CALDERÓN LÜNING, E., 2023. Civic participation in the datafied society: a democratic approach to digital rights. International Journal of Communication, vol. 17. Disponível em: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18907
POHLE, Julia, 2020. Digital sovereignty: a new key concept of digital policy in Germany and Europe. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/228713
POHLE, Julia e THIEL, Thorsten, 2020. Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, vol. 9, no. 4. DOI 10.14763/2020.4.1532. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532
SCHMIDT, Franziska, 2021. Why feminist digital policy matters. Em: HERLO, B., IRRGANG, D., UNTEIDIG, A., e JOOST, G. (Hrsg.), Practicing sovereignty: digital involvement in times of crises. transcript, p. 213–231.
SOF, 2022. Pistas feministas para construir soberania tecnológica a partir dos movimentos populares. [Acesso em 5 outubro 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.sof.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/11
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Alexandre Costa Barbosa, Bianca Herlo, Gesche Joost

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam na Liinc em Revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Consulte a Política de Acesso Livre e Autoarquivamento para informações permissão de depósitos de versões pré-print de manuscritos e artigos submetidos ou publicados à/pela Liinc em Revista.
Liinc em Revista, publicada pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, é licenciada sob os termos da Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional – CC BY 4.0