ANÁLISE DE INDICADORES PARA CIDADES INTELIGENTES

uma revisão sistemática e proposta de agenda de pesquisa

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2024v10n2e-6879

Palavras-chave:

smart cities, indicadores, dimensões, revisão sistemática

Resumo

As cidades inteligentes integram tecnologia e agilidade para enfrentar desafios de urbanização e governança, bem como ampliar a qualidade de vida de seus cidadãos. Nesse contexto, faz-se necessário compreender os indicadores que definem o construto de smart cities, considerando o corpo teórico previamente estudado. Esta pesquisa propõe mapear os indicadores formativos de uma cidade inteligente a partir da análise dos artigos publicados sobre a temática. Além disso, pretende apresentar uma agenda de pesquisa no tema, de modo a apoiar futuros estudos neste campo de conhecimento. Como método, adotou-se uma revisão sistemática de literatura com base no Modelo Prisma. A busca considerou artigos em língua inglesa publicados nos últimos dez anos (2013-2022), utilizando como filtros as palavras “smart cities”, “indicators” e “framework”. Baseado na pesquisa, identificou-se 35 artigos, que abrangem uma série de indicadores específicos em suas áreas de atuação, alocados dentro de seis dimensões. Os achados da pesquisa oferecem aportes para pesquisadores do campo e gestores públicos que buscam conhecimentos acerca de cidades inteligentes para aplicação prática.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do autor

Rafael Tezza, UDESC

Professor de Administração Empresarial - UDESC. Doutor em Engenharia de Produção - UFSC

Pedro Hochsteiner, UDESC

Graduando em Administração Empresarial - UDESC

Referências

REFERÊNCIAS

AHVENNIEMI, H.; HUOVILA, I.; PINTO-SEPÄ, M. A. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, v. 60, p. 234-245, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009

AKANDE, A. et al. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 44, p. 475-487, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009

ANDRADE, M. F.; COUTINHO, M. M.; VASCONCELLOS, A. M. Os efeitos das necessidades humanas para o engajamento do cidadão na adoção de tecnologia para as cidades inteligentes: um estudo aplicado à cidade de Belém (PA). P2P E INOVAÇÃO, v. 10, n. 1, p. 202–225, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2023v10n1.p202-225

ANTWI-AFARI, P. et al. Modeling the Smartness or Smart Development Levels of Developing Countries' Cities. Journal of Urban Management, v. 10, n. 4, p. 369–381, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.005

ARMAN, A. et al. Identifying the Components and Interrelationships of Smart Cities in Indonesia: Supporting Policymaking via Fuzzy Cognitive Systems. IEEE Access, v. 7, p. 46136-46151, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2908622

BENITES, A.; SIMÕES, A. Assessing the urban sustainable development strategy: An application of a smart city services sustainability taxonomy. Ecological Indicators, v. 127, p. 107734, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107734

BRASIL. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia Estatística. Censo 2022 indica que o Brasil totaliza 203 milhões de habitantes: A alta na população é de 6,4% em relação a 2010. Número de domicílios tem alta de 34% em relação ao último censo e chega a 90,6 milhões de moradias. Serviços e Informações do Brasil, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/pt-br/noticias/financas-impostos-e-gestao-publica/2023/06/censo-2022-indica-que-o-brasil-totaliza-203-milhoes-de-habitantes#:~:text=%C2%BB%20Em%202022%2C%20as%20concentra%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20urbanas,viviam%20em%20cidades%20desse%20porte. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2023.

CAIRD, S. P.; HALLET, S. H.. Towards Evaluation Design for Smart City Development. Journal of Urban Design, v. 24, n. 2, p. 188–209, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1469402

CAMPOS, R. O discurso internacional das cidades inteligentes: a estratégia Smart City Berlin. 7o Congresso Luso Brasileiro Para o Planejamento Urbano, Regional, Integrado e Sustentável, p. 3, 2016. Disponível em: https://fau.ufal.br/evento/pluris2016/files/Tema%202%20-%20Cidades%20Inovadoras%20e%20%20Inteligentes/Paper1019.pdf. Acesso em: 01 junho 2023.

CHANCEL, L. et al. World Inequality Report 2022. World Inequality Lab, 2022. Disponível em: https://wir2022.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2022/01/Summary_WorldInequalityReport2022_English.pdf. Acesso em: 01 junho 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674276598

CHEN, Y.; SILVA, E. Smart transport: A comparative analysis using the most used indicators in the literature juxtaposed with interventions in English metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, v. 10, p. 100371, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100371

CHOI, H.; SONG, S. Direction for a Transition toward Smart Sustainable Cities based on the Diagnosis of Smart City Plans. Smart Cities (Basel), v. 6, n. 1, p. 156-178, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010009

CONNECTED SMART CITIES. Ranking Connected Smart Cities. Urban Systems, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.aen.pr.gov.br/sites/default/arquivos_restritos/files/documento/2022-10/relatoriorankingcsc2022.pdf. Acesso em: 28 maio 2023.

CUNHA, M. A. Smart Cities: Transformação Digital de Cidades. 1ª ed. São Paulo: FGV EAESP, 2016.

DEBNATH, A. et al. A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities. Cities, v. 37, p. 47-56, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.004

DAS, D. Perspectives of smart cities in South Africa through applied systems analysis approach: A case of Bloemfontein. Construction Economics and Building, v. 20, n. 2, p. 65-88, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v20i2.6657

DASHKEVYCH, O.; PORTNOV, B. A. Criteria for Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 8, p. 4448, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14084448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084448

DZUPKA, P.; HORVATH, M. URBAN SMART-MOBILITY PROJECTS EVALUATION. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, v. 16, n.4, p. 55-76, 2021.

FARINIUK, D. T. Smart cities e pandemia: tecnologias digitais na gestão pública de cidades brasileiras. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 54. p. 860-873, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200272

FERNÁNDEZ-ANEZ, V. et al. Smart city projects assessment matrix: connecting challenges and actions in the Mediterranean region. J. Urban Technol, p. 1-25, 2018.

GARAU, C. et al. A Methodological Framework for Assessing Practicability of the Urban Space: The Survey on Conditions of Practicable Environments (SCOPE) Procedure Applied in the Case Study of Cagliari (Italy). Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), v. 10, n. 11, p. 4189, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114189

GIFFINGER, R. et al. Smart Cities - Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology, p. 28, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf. Acesso em: 01 junho 2023.

HELLIWELL, J. F. et al. World Happiness Report 2023. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, v. 11, p. 25 , 2023. Disponível em: https://happiness-report.s3.amazonaws.com/2023/WHR+23.pdf. Acesso em: 04 junho 2023.

HSU, W. et al. Smart City Governance Evaluation in the Era of Internet of Things: An Empirical Analysis of Jiangsu, China. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), v. 13 n. 24, p. 13606, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413606

KIM, N.; YANG, S. Characteristics of Conceptually Related Smart Cities (CRSCs) Services from the Perspective of Sustainability. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 13, n 6, p. 3334, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063334

KLOPP, J.; PETRETTA, D. The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, v. 63, p. 92-97, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019

KOURTIT, K. et al. Comparative Urban Performance Assessment of Safe Cities through Data Envelopment Analysis. Regional Science Policy & Practice, v. 13, n. 3, p. 591–602, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12276

KOURTIT, K.; NIJKAMP, P. Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities – An experiment on Stockholm. Land Use Policy, v. 71, p. 24-35, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.019

KUTTY, A. A. et al. Urban Resilience and Livability Performance of European Smart Cities: A Novel Machine Learning Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 378, p. 134203, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203

LIN, C. et al. Smart City Development and Residents’ Well-Being. Sustainability, v. 11, n.3, p. 676, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030676

LIU, J. et al. Towards sustainable smart cities: Maturity assessment and development pattern recognition in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 370, p. 133248, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133248

MOHER, D. et al. THE PRISMA GROUP. Principais itens para relatar revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, v. 24, n. 2, p. 355-342, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017

MOUSTAKA, V. et al. Urban Data Dynamics: A Systematic Benchmarking Framework to Integrate Crowdsourcing and Smart Cities’ Standardization. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), v. 13, n.15, p. 8553, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158553

NIETO BERNAL, W.; GARCÍA ESPITALETA, K. Framework for Developing an Information Technology Maturity Model for Smart City Services in Emerging Economies: (FSCE2). Applied Sciences, v. 11, n. 22, p. 10712, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210712

NTAFALIAS, A. et al. A Comprehensive Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Smart City Interventions: Evidence from Espoo Transformation Process. Smart Cities (Basel), v. 5 n. 1, p. 90-107, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010006

OGRODNIK, K. Multi-criteria analysis of smart cities in Poland. Geographia Polonica, v. 93 n. 2, p. 163-181, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0168

LEKA, A.; STRATIGEA, A.; PANAGIOTOPOULOU, M. In search of indicators for assessing smart and sustainable cities and communities' performance .Int. J. E-Plan. Res, vol. 6 n. 1, p. 43-73, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2017010103

LOPEZ-CARREIRO, I.; MONZON, A. Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 38, p. 684-696, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.029

POLIAKOVA, O.; POZDNIAKOVA, A. A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE PROGRESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMART CITY CONCEPT IN UKRAINIAN CITIES. Problemi Ekonomìki, v. 1, n. 1, p. 74-82, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-1-74-82

PURNOMO, F.; MEYLIANA.; PRABOWO, H. Smart City Indicators: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), v. 8, n. 3, p. 161–164, 2016.

RAHMANI MOKARRARI, K.; TORABI, S. Ranking cities based on their smartness level using MADM methods. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 72, p. 103030, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103030

REBERNIK, N. et al. Measuring Disability Inclusion Performance in Cities Using Disability Inclusion Evaluation Tool (DIETool). Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), v. 12 n. 4, p. 1378, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041378

SENOUSI, A. et al A Proposed Framework for Identification of Indicators to Model High-Frequency Cities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, v. 10, n. 5, p. 317, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050317

SHARIFI, A.; ALLAM, Z. On the taxonomy of smart city indicators and their alignment with sustainability and resilience. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, v. 49, n. 5, p. 1536-1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211058798. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211058798

SHARIFI, A. A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 233, p. 1269-1283, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172

SHARIFI, A. Smart City Indicators: Towards Exploring Potential Linkages to Disaster Resilience Abilities. APN Science Bulletin (Online), v. 2022, n. 1, p. 76–90, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30852/sb.2022.1873

SHEN, L. et al. A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 200, p. 667-679. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.281

SHRUTI, S.; SINGH, P.; OHRI, A. Evaluating the Environmental Sustainability of Smart Cities in India: The Design and Application of the Indian Smart City Environmental Sustainability Index. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), v. 13, n. 1, p. 327, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010327

TAN, M. Creating the digital economy: Strategies and perspectives from singapore. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 3, n. 3, p. 105-122, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1999.11518344

WENDLING, L. et al. Benchmarking Nature-Based Solution and Smart City Assessment Schemes Against the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator Framework. Frontiers in Environmental Science, v. 6, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00069

WESTRAADT, L., & CALITIZ, A. A modeling framework for integrated smart city planning and management. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 63, p. 102444, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102444

YEH, H. The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens' perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, v. 34, n. 3, p. 556-565, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.001

ZAIDAN, E. et al. Accelerating the Change to Smart Societies- a Strategic Knowledge-Based Framework for Smart Energy Transition of Urban Communities. Frontiers in energy research, v. 10, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.852092

ZAPOLSKYTE, S. et al. Evaluation Criteria of Smart City Mobility System Using MCDM Method. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, v. 15, n. 4, p. 196-224, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.501

Downloads

Publicado

25/03/2024

Como citar

TEZZA, R.; HOCHSTEINER, P.; KIELING, A. P. ANÁLISE DE INDICADORES PARA CIDADES INTELIGENTES: uma revisão sistemática e proposta de agenda de pesquisa. P2P E INOVAÇÃO, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, v. 10, n. 2, p. e–6879, 2024. DOI: 10.21728/p2p.2024v10n2e-6879. Disponível em: https://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/6879. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Sustentabilidade

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.