Impact of technological innovation on industries located in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21721/p2p.2020v7n1.p260-274Keywords:
Innovation, Technologic innovation, Innovation impactsAbstract
This study aimed to determine the impact of technologic innovation (product and process) made by firms located in Brazil, “in product”, and “in process”. There was the characterization of the companies based on four sets of impact indicators (product and process), in Innovation Research (PINTEC). It conducted separation of enterprises by type of innovation performed, forming groups: companies that made “only product innovation”, “only process innovation” and “product innovation and process” concurrently. The main results showed the preference of companies to make more than one type of innovation simultaneously (“product and process”), due to its amount significantly higher companies to the companies that made “only product innovation” and “only innovation process”; the impact of innovation was mainly “in product”, and about the impact “in process”, highlight the “increased flexibility of production” and the “increase in production capacity”.
Downloads
References
AGÊNCIA BRASILEIRA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO INDUSTRIAL. Contribuições para a política de desenvolvimento industrial, de inovação e de comércio exterior: período 2011/2014. Brasília, DF: ABDI, [2014?]. Disponível em: https://jacksondetoni.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/texto-teorico-pbm.pdf. Acesso em: 20 ago 2020.
ARISS, S. S.; DEILAMI, V. S. An integrated framework for the study of organizational innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, Singapore, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1 26, 2012.
BAREGHEH, A.; ROWLEY, J.; SAMBROOK, S. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, Melbourne, v. 47, n. 8, p. 1323-1339, 2009.
BAUMOL, W. J. The free-market innovation machine: analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Woodstock, Oxon: Princeton University Press, 2002.
BECKER, S. W.; WHISLER, T. L. The innovative organization: a selective review of current theory and research. The Journal of Business, Chicago, v. 40, n. 4, p. 462-469, 1967.
CHEN, J.; ZHAOHUI, Z.; XIE, H. Y. Measuring intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Singapore, v. 5, n. 1, p. 195-212, 2004.
CHRISTENSEN, C. M. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press, 1997.
DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effect of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, New York, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555-590, 1991.
DAMANPOUR, F. Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics. Journal of High Technology Management Research, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 149-173, 1996.
DOSI, G. Sourses, procedures and microeconomics effets of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, Nashville, v. 26, 1988.
DOSI, G. Mudança técnica e transformação industrial: a teoria e uma aplicação à indústria dos semicondutores. Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 2006.
DOWNS Jr., G.; MOHR, L. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 700-714, 1976.
EVANGELISTA, R.; VEZZANI, A. The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations: a firm-level analysis. Research Policy, [S. l.], n. 39, 2010.
FREEMAN, C. The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1974.
GARCIA, R.; CALANTONE, R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, [S. l.], v. 19, p. 110-132, 2001.
GARCIA-MORALES, V. J.; MATIAS-RECHE, F.; HURTADO-TORRES, N. Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Melbourne, v. 21, n. 2, p. 188-212, 2008.
HENDERSON, R.; CLARK, K. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 35, p. 9-30, 1990.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Pesquisa de inovação: PINTEC 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2010.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Pesquisa de inovação: PINTEC 2011. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2013.
KNIGHT, K. E. A descriptive model of intra-firm innovation process. Journal of Management, [S. l.], v. 41, n. 4, p. 478-496, 1967.
OCDE. Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FINEP, 2005.
PLESSIS, M. D. The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 20-29, 2007.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura, 1961.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo: Editora Abril Cultural, 1982.
THOMPSON, V. A. Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 10, p. 1-20, 1965.
TUSHMAN, M.; NADLER, D. Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, Berkeley, v. 28, n. 2, p. 74-92, 1986.
WEST, M. A.; ANDERSON, N. R. Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, Washington, v. 81, p. 680-693, 1996.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The journal is published under the Creative Commons - Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Brazil.
The published work is considered collaboration and therefore the author will not receive any remuneration for this as well as anything will be charged in exchange for publication.
All texts are responsibility of the authors.
It’s allowed partial or total reproduction of the texts of the magazine since the source is cited.
