Measuring scientific information on the web 2.0

exploring Altmetric's platafform possibilities and limitations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v49i3.5657

Keywords:

Informetrics., Social media, Social web, Altmetric tools, Altmetrics

Abstract

With the evolution of the Internet, new ways of collaboratively creating and sharing knowledge emerged, culminating in the Web 2.0 (Web social). With the evolution of the Internet, emerge new ways of creating and sharing knowledge collaboratively, culminating in the Web 2.0 (Web social). The products resulted from academic and scientific activities also began to circulate in the social media, inspiring the interest of researchers in the measurement and study of actions and interactions related to such activities, arising altmetrics. Since then, technologies, tools and platforms have been created to measure these phenomena, and Altmetric, from Digital Science, is currently the main platform for collecting altmetrics data. This research aims to explore the possibilities, limitations and structural characteristics of Altmetric as a source of data and altmetric indicators. The platform is analyzed in an exploratory and experimental way, based on data from SciELO’s collection and an interview with Altmetric's director of research relations, Stacy Konkiel. As a result, several possibilities, limitations and characteristics related to the conceptual foundations and the production of the platform indicators were presented and discussed, as well as the types of sources / data tracked; coverage range; calculation of the Altmetric score; popularity and media coverage; possibilities of studying correlations between citations and mentions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Janinne Barcelos de Morais Silva, UnB

    Doutoranda em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB) – Brasília, DF - Brasil. Mestre em Comunicação pela Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) – GO - Brasil. Assistente de pesquisa do Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict) – Brasília, DF – Brasil.

  • João de Melo Maricato

    Pós-Doutorado pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB) – Brasília, DF - Brasil. Doutor em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - São Paulo, SP – Brasil. Professor da Universidade de Brasília (UnB) – Brasília, DF – Brasil.

  • Diego José Macêdo

    Mestre em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB) – Brasília, DF – Brasil. Tecnologista do Instituto Brasileiro de Informações em Ciência e Tecnologia (IBICT) – Brasília, DF – Brasil.

References

ADIE, E.; ROE, W. Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, v. 26, n. 1, p. 11-17, Jan. 2013.
AHMED, Wasim. Using Twitter as a data source: an overview of social media research tools (updated for 2017). LSE Impact Blog. Londres, 08 de maio de 2017. Disponível em: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/05/08/using-twitter-as-a-data-source-an-overview-of-social-media-research-tools-updated-for-2017/. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2019.
ALPERIN, J. P. Ask not what Altmetrics can do for you, but what altmetrics can do for developing countries. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr13/AprMay13_Alperin.html. Acesso em: 30 out. 2017.
ALTMETRIC (Inglaterra). About our data. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.altmetric.com/about-our-data/. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2019.
BARROS, M. Altmetrics: métricas alternativas de impacto científico com base em redes sociais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 20, n. 2, 2015.
CASTELLS, Manuel. A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999. (A era da informação: economia, sociedade e cultura).
COSTAS, Rodrigo; ZAHEDI, Zohreh; WOUTERS, Paul. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, p. 2003-2019, 2015.
ROBINSON-GARCIA, Nicolás; TORRES-SALINAS, Daniel; ZAHEDI, Zohreh; COSTAS, Rodrigo. New data, new possibilities: exploring the insides of Altmetric.com. El profesional de la información, v. 23, n.4, p. 359-366. 2014. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0135. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2019.
FAIRCLOUGH, Ruth; THELWALL, Mike. National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers. Journal of Informetrics, v. 9, n. 4, p. 845-859, 2015.
HAUSTEIN, S. Multidimensional journal evaluation: analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor. Berlim: De Gruyter/Saur, 2012 Disponível em: http://books.google.com.br/books?id=MH1N4ottpdMC. Acesso em: 22 nov 2019.
HUGHES, David John; ROWE, Moss; BATEY, Mark; et al. A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 28, n. 2, p. 561–569, 2012. Disponível em: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/28062/ . Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.
HUANG, W.; WANG, P.; WU, Q. A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journals. PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 4, 2018. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194962. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2019.
KONKIEL, S (no prelo). A altmetria na Altmetric: uma entrevista com Stacy Konkiel. [Entrevista concedida a] Janinne Barcelos, Diego José Macedo, João de Melo Maricato. RICI, Brasília, 2019.
LEMOS, André. Cibercultura, Tecnologia e vida social na cultura contemporânea. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2002.
LEWENSTEIN, B. Models of Public Communication of Science & Technology. 2003. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/43775/mod_resource/content/1/Texto/Lewenstein . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2017.
NASSI-CALÓ, Lilian. Estudo analisa o uso de redes sociais na avaliação do impacto científico. SciELO em Perspectiva, 13 de março de 2015. Disponível em: http://blog.SciELO.org/blog/2015/03/13/estudo-analisa-o-uso-de-redes-sociais-na-avaliacao-do-impacto-cientifico/#.WYuns4jyvIU . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2019.
NASSI-CALÒ, Lilian. A miopia dos indicadores bibliométricos. SciELO em Perspectiva, 01 de junho de 2017. Disponível em: https://blog.SciELO.org/blog/2017/06/01/a-miopia-dos-indicadores-bibliometricos/#.Xe1Bv-hKjIU. Acesso em: 3 nov. 2019.
O’NEIL, J. NISO recommended practice: outputs of the Alternative Assessment Metrics Project. Collaborative Librarianship, v. 8, n. 3, p. 118–123, 2016. Disponível em: http://informationr.net/ir/23-1/paper780.html. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2019.
PIWOWAR, H. A. Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, v. 493, n. 159, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/493159a. Acesso em: 21 out. 2019.
PRIEM, J. et al. Altmetrics: manifesto de 26 outubro de 2010. Disponível em: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto. Acesso em: 31 out. 2019.
PRIEM, J.; HEMMINGER, B. M. Scientometrics 2.0: Toward New Metrics of Scholar-ly Impact on the Social Web. First Monday, Bridgman, v.15, n. 7-5, 2010. Disponível em: http://pear.accc.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2874. Acesso em: 07 nov. 2019.
ROEMER, Robin Chin; BORCHARDT, Rachel. Altmetrics. Chicago: Amer Library Assn, 2015.
SALINAS, D. T.; CLAVIJO, A. C.; CONTRERAS, E. J. Altmetrics: new indicators for scientific communication in web 2.0. Comunicar, 2013. Disponível: https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6595. Acesso: 22 nov. 2019.

Published

29/06/2021

Most read articles by the same author(s)