Transformación digital en la esfera pública: un análisis bibliométrico

Authors

  • Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi Universidade Católica de Brasília , Curso de Sistemas de Informação - UCB-DF
  • Wanderson Aparecido da Silva Alves
  • Ana Paula Bernardi da Silva
  • Helga Cristina Hedler

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v52i2.7098

Keywords:

gobernanza electrónica, gobernanza de las tecnologías de la información, análisis bibliométrico

Abstract

Este estudio aborda el impacto significativo de la tecnología en el crecimiento y prominencia de las organizaciones contemporáneas, examinando la relación entre la transformación digital y la sostenibilidad empresarial. La investigación destaca la importancia de las adaptaciones digitales para mantener la relevancia en el mercado global. El enfoque principal es realizar un análisis bibliométrico sobre la transformación digital, identificando temas emergentes que contribuyen a la valorización de las organizaciones. La metodología adoptada consiste en una revisión de literatura, utilizando la base de datos Scopus y herramientas como VOSviewer y Gephi para el análisis de redes de coocurrencia de palabras clave, cocitación de referencias citadas, acoplamiento bibliográfico de documentos e identificación de tendencias emergentes. Además, se emplea el análisis de contenido para un examen más detallado de los temas identificados. Los resultados indican que la efectividad de la transformación digital en una organización está intrínsecamente ligada a su nivel de madurez en gobernanza electrónica. Además, se evidencia que la adopción de un marco de gobernanza de TI es crucial para una implementación exitosa de la transformación digital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi, Universidade Católica de Brasília , Curso de Sistemas de Informação - UCB-DF

    Doutorado em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de Brasília, UNB, Brasilia, Brasil. Mestrado em Engenharia Elétrica pela Universidade de Brasília, UNB, Brasilia, Brasil. Graduação em Intendência pela Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras, AMAN, Brasil. Graduação em Engenharia Eletrônica pelo Instituto Militar de Engenharia, IME, Rio De Janeiro, Brasil. Assessor Técnico da Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos, CGEE, Brasil. Professor da Universidade Católica de Brasília , Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia , Mestrado em Gestão do Conhecimento e da Tecnologia da Informação.


References

ALALWAN, A. A.; BAABDULLAH, A. M.; DWIVEDI, Y. K.; RANA, N. P.; LAL, B. RAMAN, R. Et-moone and marketing relationship governance: the effect of digital transformation and ICT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Industrial Marketing Management, Bradford, n. 98, p. 241–254, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.09.001

ALENIZI, A. S.; AL-KARAWI, K. A. Cloud Computing Adoption-Based Digital Open Government Services: Challenges and Barriers. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, [s. l.], n. 216, p. 149–160, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1781-2_15

ALLEN, B.; TAMINDAEL, L. E.; BICKERTON, S. H.; CHO, W. Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 101412, Jan. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412

ANDERSEN, K. V.; HENRIKSEN, H. Z. E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, Copenhage, v. 23, n. 2, p. 236–248, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008

ANWAR, M.; JOSHI, J.; TAN, J. Anytime, anywhere access to secure, privacy-aware healthcare services: Issues, approaches and challenges. Health Policy and Technology, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 299–311, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.08.007

BASTIAN, M.; HEYMANN, S.; JACOMY, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 361-362, 2009. DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937

BERTOT, J. C.; JAEGER, P. T.; GRIMES, J. M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, Washington, v. 27, n. 3, p. 264–271, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

BLONDEL, V. D.; GUILLAUME, J.-L.; LAMBIOTTE, R.; LEFEBVRE, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: theory and experiment, [s. l.], v. 2008, n. 10, p. P10008, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

BORGATTI, S. P.; EVERETT, M. G.; FREEMAN, L. C. Ucinet 6 for Windows: software for social network analysis. Connections, Harvard, v. 15, n. 1/2, 2002.

BÖRNER, K.; CHEN, C.; BOYACK, K. W. Visualizing knowledge domains. In: Annual review of information science and technology, v. 45, n. 1, p. 179–255, Jan. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106

CALLON, M.; COURTIAL, J. P.; TURNER, W. A.; BAUIN, S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 191–235, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003

CAMARGO, B. V.; JUSTO, A. M. IRAMUTEQ: um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas em Psicologia, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 513-518, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2013.2-16

CHATFIELD, A. T.; REDDICK, C. G. Understanding Risk Communication Gaps through E-Government Website and Twitter Hashtag Content Analyses: the case of Indonesia’s Mt. Sinabung Eruption. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Wollongong, v. 12, n. 2, p. 351–385, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0086

CHATFIELD, A. T.; REDDICK, C. G. Smart City Implementation Through Shared Vision of Social Innovation for Environmental Sustainability: a case study of Kitakyushu, Japan. Social Science Computer Review, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 6, p. 757–773, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611085

COURSEY, D.; NORRIS, D. F. Models of E-Government: are they correct? an empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 68, n. 3, p. 523–536, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x

DEJA, M.; RAK, D.; BELL, B. Digital transformation readiness: perspectives on academia and library outcomes in information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 5, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102403

DWIVEDI, Y. K.; HUGHES, D. L.; COOMBS, C.; CONSTANTIOU, J.; DUAN, Y.; EDWARDS, J. S.; GUPTA, B.; LAL, B.; MISRA, S.; PRASHANT, P.; RAMAN, R.; RANA, N. P.; SHARMA, S. K.; UPADHYAY, N. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], n. 55, p. 102211, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211

EBRAHIM, Z.; IRANI, Z. E‐government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 5, p. 589–611, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/14637150510619902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150510619902

ELGAZZAR, Y.; EL-SHAHAWY, R.; SENOUSY, Y. The Role of Digital Transformation in Enhancing Business Resilience with Pandemic of COVID-19. In: Magdi, D.A., Helmy, Y.K., Mamdouh, M., Joshi, A. (ed.). Digital Transformation Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Singapore: Springer, 2022. v. 224. p. 323–333. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2275-5_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2275-5_20

ELLEGAARD, O.; WALLIN, J. A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, [s. l.], v. 105, n. 3, p. 1809–1831, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

EVANS, D.; YEN, D. C. E-Government: evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 207–235, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004

GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, F. J.; CORELL, A.; ABELLA-GARCÍA, V.; GRANDE, M. Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, [s. l.], v. 19, p. 12-1/12-26, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086

GARFIELD, J.; AHLGREN, A. Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 44–63, 1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.1.0044

GLÄNZEL, W.; THIJS, B. Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, [s. l.], v. 91, n. 2, p. 399–416, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7

GÖKALP, E.; ŞENER, U.; EREN, P. E. Development of an assessment model for industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM. Communications in Computer and Information Science, [s. l.], n. 770, p. 128–142, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10

GREGORY, R. W.; KAGANER, E.; HENFRIDSSON, O.; RUCH, T. J. It consumerization and the transformation of it governance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 4, p. 1225–1253, 2018. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2018/13703.

GRUCHMANN, T.; BISCHOFF, O. Blockchain-driven handling of digital freight information: A tensions perspective. Logistics Research, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 1-16, 2021. DOI: 10.23773/2021_3.

GUNDUZ, M. A.; DEMIR, S.; PAKSOY, T. Matching functions of supply chain management with smart and sustainable Tools: a novel hybrid BWM-QFD based method. Computers and Industrial Engineering, [s. l.], v. 162, p. 107676, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107676

HAN, H.; TRIMI, S. Towards a data science platform for improving SME collaboration

through Industry 4.0 technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s. l.], v. 174, p. 121242, Jan. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121242

HARRISON, T. M.; GUERRERO, S.; BURKE, G. B.; COOK, M. E., CRESSWELL, A. M.; HELBIG, N.; HRDINOV, J.; PARDO, T. A. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 83–97, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0269

HEEKS, R.; BAILUR, S. Analyzing e-government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, Manchester, v. 24, n. 2, p. 243–265, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005

HOFMANN, P.; SAMP, C.; URBACH, N. Robotic process automation. Electronic

Markets, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 99–106, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00365-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00365-8

HOGNOGI, G.-G.; POP, A.-M.; MARIAN-POTRA, A.-C.; SOMEȘFĂLEAN, T. The role of UAS–GIS in digital Era governance: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, Switzerland, v. 13, n. 19, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911097

JANSSEN, M.; HELBIG, N. Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: policy-makers be prepared! Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 4, p. S99–S105, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009. Supplement. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009

KAMALALDIN, A.; LINDE, L.; SJÖDIN, D.; PARIDA, V. Transforming provider-customer relationships in digital servitization: a relational view on digitalization. Industrial Marketing Management, [s. l.], v. 89, p. 306–325, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.004

KAPPELMAN, L.; JOHNSON, V.; TORRES, R.; MAURER, C.; MCLEAN, E. A study of information systems issues, practices, and leadership in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 26–42, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1497929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1497929

KESSLER, M. M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 10–25, 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103

KOHLI, R.; JOHNSON, S. Digital transformation in latecomer industries: CIO and CEO leadership lessons from Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. MIS Quarterly Executive, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 141–156, 2011.

KÜCHER, A.; FELDBAUER-DURSTMÜLLER, B. Organizational failure and decline: a bibliometric study of the scientific frontend. Journal of Business Research, [s. l.], n. 98, p. 503–516, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.017

KYRYCHENKO, M.; YAKUBOVSKIY, S.; RODIONOVA, T. Digital Transformation of the Oil Refining Sector in Ukraine. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Info communications, 2020, Kharkiv. Conference […]. Kharkiv: IEEE. 2020. p. 733-736. DOI: 10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468064

LAUFER, M.; LEISER, A.; DEACON, B.; BRICHAMBAUT, P. P.; FECHER, B.; KOBSDA, C.; HESSE F. Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 1, 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6

LAYNE, K.; LEE, J. Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 122–136, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1

LEÃO, P.; SILVA, M. M. Impacts of digital transformation on firms’ competitive advantages: a systematic literature review. Strategic Change, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 5, p. 421–441, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2459

LEE, J. 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 3, p. 220–230, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009

LEE-GEILLER, S.; LEE, T. D. Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: a conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 2, p. 208–225, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003

LINDERS, D.; LIAO, C. Z.-P.; WANG, C.-M. Proactive e-Governance: flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 4, p. S68–S76, 2018. Supplement. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004

LOUBÈRE, L.; RATINAUD, P. Documentation IRaMuTeQ. [S. l.]: IRaMuTeQ, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/documentation_19_02_2014.pdf. Acesso em: 5 set. 2021.

MARCHE, S.; MCNIVEN, J. D. E-government and e-governance: the future isn’t what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 74–86, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x

MARTINEZ-BALLESTE, A.; PEREZ-MARTINEZ, P.; SOLANAS, A. The pursuit of citizens’ privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible. IEEE Communications Magazine, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 6, p. 136–141, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525606

MCCAIN, K. W. Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 4, p. 491–516, 1991. DOI: 10.1177/016224399101600404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600404

MCCAIN, N. L.; LYNN, M. R. Meta-Analysis of a Narrative Review: studies evaluating patient teaching. Western Journal of Nursing Research, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 347–358, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599001200307

MCNUTT, J. G.; JUSTICE, J. B.; MELITSKI, J. M.; AHN, M. J.; SIDDIQUI, S. R.; CARTER, D. T.; Kline, A. D. The diffusion of civic technology and open government in the United States. Information Polity, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 153–170, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160385

MOON, M. J. The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 62, n. 4, p. 424–433, July/Aug. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196

MORESI, E. A. D.; PINHO, I. Proposta de abordagem para refinamento de pesquisa bibliográfica. New Trends in Qualitative Research, Portugal, v. 9, p. 11–20, 2021. DOI: 10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20

MORESI, E. A. D., PINHO, I., Costa, A. P. How to operate literature review through qualitative and quantitative analysis integration? IN: COSTA, A. P., MOREIRA, A., SÁNCHEZ-GÓMEZ, M. C., WA-MBALEKA, S. (ed.). Computer Supported Qualitative Research. WCQR 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. [S. l.]: Springer, n. 466, p. 194-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04680-3_13

NEWMAN, M. Networks: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

NEWMAN, Y. C.; AGYIN-BIRIKORANG, S.; ADJEI, M. B.; SCHOLBERG, M. L.; SILVEIRA, J. M. B.; VENDRAMINI, J. E.; RECHCIGL, L. E.; SOLLENBERGER, CHRYSOSTOME, M. Enhancing Phosphorus Phytoremedation Potential of Two Warm-Season Perennial Grasses with Nitrogen Fertilization. Agronomy Journal, [s. l.], v. 101, n. 6, p. 1345–1351, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0163

NIELSEN, M. M. E-governance and stage models: analysis of identified models and selected Eurasian experiences in digitising citizen service delivery. Electronic Government, an International Journal, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 107–141, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.076132

PASADEOS, Y.; PHELPS, J.; KIM, B.-H. Disciplinary Impact of Advertising Scholars: temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 4, p. 53–70, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673569

PEREIRA, G. V.; PARYCEK, P.; FALCO, E.; KLEINHANS, R. Smart governance in the context of smart cities: a literature review. Information Polity, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 143–162, 2018. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067

PRITCHARD, R. D. Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 176–211, 1969. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(69)90005-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90005-1

PIZZI, S.; VENTURELLI, A.; VARIALE, M.; MACARIO, G. P. Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, v. 67, 101738, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738

RAGHURAM, S.; TUERTSCHER, P.; GARUD, R. Research Note: mapping the field of virtual work - a cocitation analysis. Information Systems Research, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 983–999, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0227

RANGANATHAN, C.; TEO, T. S. H.; DHALIWAL, J. Web-enabled supply chain management: Key antecedents and performance impacts. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 6, p. 533–545, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.004

REDDICK, C. G.; CHATFIELD, A. T.; JARAMILLO, P. A. Public opinion on National Security Agency surveillance programs: a multi-method approach. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 2, p. 129–141, Apr. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.003

ROY, J. E-government in Canada: transformation for the digital age. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book4431

RUHNAU, B. Eigenvector-centrality: a node-centrality? Social Networks, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 357–365, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00031-9

SANDOVAL-ALMAZAN, R.; GIL-GARCIA, J. R. Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 29, p. S72–S81, Jan. 2012. Supplemet 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.004

SANDVIK, K. B. The Norwegian COVID-19 Tracing App Experiment: lessons for governance and civic activism. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 66–73, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3101824

SAXENA, K. B. C. Towards excellence in e-governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 6, p. 498–513, 2005. DOI 10.1108/09513550510616733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733

SHARMA, R.; MISHRA, R.; MISHRA, A. Determinants of satisfaction among social entrepreneurs in e-Government services. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 60, p. 102386, Oct. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102386

SMALL, G. W.; RABINS, P. V.; BARRY, P. P.; BUCKHOLTZ, N. S.; DEKOSKY, S. T.; FERRIS, S. H.; FINKEL, S. I.; GWYTHER, L. P.; KHACHATURIAN, Z. S.; LEBOWITZ, B. D.; MCRAE, T. D.; MORRIS, J. C.; OAKLEY, F.; SCHNEIDER, L. S.; STREIM, J. E.; SUNDERLAND, T.; TERI, L. A.; TUNE, E. L. Diagnosis and Treatment of Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders: consensus statement of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer’s Association, and the American Geriatrics Society. JAMA, [s. l.], v. 278, n. 16, p. 1363–1371, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550160083043

SMALL, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 4, p. 265–269, July/Aug. 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

SMALL, H.; GRIFFITH, B. C. The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 17-40, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400102

SOUSSAN, T.; TROVATI, M. Sentiment urgency emotion conversion over time for business intelligence. International Journal of Web Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 5, p. 519-528, Oct. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-08-2020-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-08-2020-0049

SU, R.; OBRENOVIC, B.; DU, J.; GODINIC, D.; KHUDAYKULOV, A. COVID-19 Pandemic Implications for Corporate Sustainability and Society: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [s. l.], v. 19, p. 1-23, Jan. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031592

TABAR, S.; SHARMA, S.; VOLKMAN, D.; LEE, H. Analyzing the network readiness index in the United States to assess ICT infrastructure in handling crises like COVID-19. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), [s. l.], v. 17, n. 4, p. 1–14, 2021. DOI: 10.4018/IJEGR.2021100101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021100101

TANGI, L.; JANSSEN, M.; BENEDETTI, M.; NOCI, G. Digital government transformation: a structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 60, p. 102356, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356

TEO, T. S. H.; SRIVASTAVA, S. C.; JIANG, L. Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 3, p. 99–132, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303

THOMAS, J. C.; STREIB, G. The new face of government: citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 83–102, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug010

ÜSDIKEN, B.; PASADEOS, Y. Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe:

a comparison of co-citation networks. Organization Studies, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 503–526, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306

VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., Wolfram, D. (eds.). Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. New York: Springer, 2014. p 285–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2022.

WALTMAN, L.; VAN ECK, N. J.; NOYONS, E. C. M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 629-635, Out. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002

WEERAKKODY, V.; JANSSEN, M.; DWIVEDI, Y. K. Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 320–328, July. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010

WEST, D. M. E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. 15–27, Feb. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x

WHITE, M. D.; MARSH, E. E. Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library Trends, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 1, p. 22-45, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053

WHITE, H. D.; MCCAIN, K. W. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 4, p. 327–355, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-W

YILDIZ, M. E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 646–665, July. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002

YUCEL, S. Estimating the benefits, drawbacks and risk of digital transformation strategy. In: 2018 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 2018, Las Vegas. Anais […]. Las Vegas: IEEE, 2008. p. 233-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI46756.2018.00051

YURKEVICH, E. V.; STEPANOVSKAYA, I. A.; KRYUKOVA, L. N. Mechanisms of Information Support for the Digital Transformation of Space Complexes Based on the Concept of Socio-cyber-physical Self-organization. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’21). [S. l.]: Springer Link, 2022, v. 330, p. 629-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_62

ZENG, Z.; LI, S.; LIAN, J.-W.; ZENG, Z.; LI, S.; LIAN, J.-W.; LI, J., CHEN, T., LI, Y. Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: a perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework. Land Use Policy, [s. l.], v. 109, Oct. p. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105629

ZUPIC, I.; ČATER, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 429–472, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

21/06/2024

Issue

Vol. 52 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Literature Review

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi, Wanderson Aparecido da Silva Alves, Ana Paula Bernardi da Silva, Helga Cristina Hedler

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  • This publication reserves the right to modify the original, regarding norms, spelling and grammar, in order to maintain the standards of the language, still respecting author writing style;
  • The final proofs will not be sent to the authors;
  • Published works become Ciência da Informação's property, their second partial or full print being subject to expressed authorization by IBICT's Director;
  • The original source of publicaton must be provided at all times;
  • The authors are solely responsible fo the views expressed within the article;
  • Each author will receive two hard copies of the issue, if made availalbe in print.

Most read articles by the same author(s)