Transformación digital en la esfera pública: un análisis bibliométrico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v52i2.7098Palabras clave:
gobernanza electrónica, gobernanza de las tecnologías de la información, análisis bibliométricoResumen
Este estudio aborda el impacto significativo de la tecnología en el crecimiento y prominencia de las organizaciones contemporáneas, examinando la relación entre la transformación digital y la sostenibilidad empresarial. La investigación destaca la importancia de las adaptaciones digitales para mantener la relevancia en el mercado global. El enfoque principal es realizar un análisis bibliométrico sobre la transformación digital, identificando temas emergentes que contribuyen a la valorización de las organizaciones. La metodología adoptada consiste en una revisión de literatura, utilizando la base de datos Scopus y herramientas como VOSviewer y Gephi para el análisis de redes de coocurrencia de palabras clave, cocitación de referencias citadas, acoplamiento bibliográfico de documentos e identificación de tendencias emergentes. Además, se emplea el análisis de contenido para un examen más detallado de los temas identificados. Los resultados indican que la efectividad de la transformación digital en una organización está intrínsecamente ligada a su nivel de madurez en gobernanza electrónica. Además, se evidencia que la adopción de un marco de gobernanza de TI es crucial para una implementación exitosa de la transformación digital.
Descargas
Referencias
ALALWAN, A. A.; BAABDULLAH, A. M.; DWIVEDI, Y. K.; RANA, N. P.; LAL, B. RAMAN, R. Et-moone and marketing relationship governance: the effect of digital transformation and ICT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Industrial Marketing Management, Bradford, n. 98, p. 241–254, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.09.001
ALENIZI, A. S.; AL-KARAWI, K. A. Cloud Computing Adoption-Based Digital Open Government Services: Challenges and Barriers. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, [s. l.], n. 216, p. 149–160, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1781-2_15
ALLEN, B.; TAMINDAEL, L. E.; BICKERTON, S. H.; CHO, W. Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 101412, Jan. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412
ANDERSEN, K. V.; HENRIKSEN, H. Z. E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, Copenhage, v. 23, n. 2, p. 236–248, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
ANWAR, M.; JOSHI, J.; TAN, J. Anytime, anywhere access to secure, privacy-aware healthcare services: Issues, approaches and challenges. Health Policy and Technology, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 299–311, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.08.007
BASTIAN, M.; HEYMANN, S.; JACOMY, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 361-362, 2009. DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
BERTOT, J. C.; JAEGER, P. T.; GRIMES, J. M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, Washington, v. 27, n. 3, p. 264–271, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
BLONDEL, V. D.; GUILLAUME, J.-L.; LAMBIOTTE, R.; LEFEBVRE, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: theory and experiment, [s. l.], v. 2008, n. 10, p. P10008, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
BORGATTI, S. P.; EVERETT, M. G.; FREEMAN, L. C. Ucinet 6 for Windows: software for social network analysis. Connections, Harvard, v. 15, n. 1/2, 2002.
BÖRNER, K.; CHEN, C.; BOYACK, K. W. Visualizing knowledge domains. In: Annual review of information science and technology, v. 45, n. 1, p. 179–255, Jan. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
CALLON, M.; COURTIAL, J. P.; TURNER, W. A.; BAUIN, S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 191–235, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
CAMARGO, B. V.; JUSTO, A. M. IRAMUTEQ: um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas em Psicologia, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 513-518, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2013.2-16
CHATFIELD, A. T.; REDDICK, C. G. Understanding Risk Communication Gaps through E-Government Website and Twitter Hashtag Content Analyses: the case of Indonesia’s Mt. Sinabung Eruption. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Wollongong, v. 12, n. 2, p. 351–385, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0086
CHATFIELD, A. T.; REDDICK, C. G. Smart City Implementation Through Shared Vision of Social Innovation for Environmental Sustainability: a case study of Kitakyushu, Japan. Social Science Computer Review, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 6, p. 757–773, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611085
COURSEY, D.; NORRIS, D. F. Models of E-Government: are they correct? an empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 68, n. 3, p. 523–536, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
DEJA, M.; RAK, D.; BELL, B. Digital transformation readiness: perspectives on academia and library outcomes in information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 5, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102403
DWIVEDI, Y. K.; HUGHES, D. L.; COOMBS, C.; CONSTANTIOU, J.; DUAN, Y.; EDWARDS, J. S.; GUPTA, B.; LAL, B.; MISRA, S.; PRASHANT, P.; RAMAN, R.; RANA, N. P.; SHARMA, S. K.; UPADHYAY, N. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], n. 55, p. 102211, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
EBRAHIM, Z.; IRANI, Z. E‐government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 5, p. 589–611, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/14637150510619902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150510619902
ELGAZZAR, Y.; EL-SHAHAWY, R.; SENOUSY, Y. The Role of Digital Transformation in Enhancing Business Resilience with Pandemic of COVID-19. In: Magdi, D.A., Helmy, Y.K., Mamdouh, M., Joshi, A. (ed.). Digital Transformation Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Singapore: Springer, 2022. v. 224. p. 323–333. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2275-5_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2275-5_20
ELLEGAARD, O.; WALLIN, J. A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, [s. l.], v. 105, n. 3, p. 1809–1831, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
EVANS, D.; YEN, D. C. E-Government: evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 207–235, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004
GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, F. J.; CORELL, A.; ABELLA-GARCÍA, V.; GRANDE, M. Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, [s. l.], v. 19, p. 12-1/12-26, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086
GARFIELD, J.; AHLGREN, A. Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 44–63, 1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.1.0044
GLÄNZEL, W.; THIJS, B. Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, [s. l.], v. 91, n. 2, p. 399–416, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7
GÖKALP, E.; ŞENER, U.; EREN, P. E. Development of an assessment model for industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM. Communications in Computer and Information Science, [s. l.], n. 770, p. 128–142, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10
GREGORY, R. W.; KAGANER, E.; HENFRIDSSON, O.; RUCH, T. J. It consumerization and the transformation of it governance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 4, p. 1225–1253, 2018. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2018/13703.
GRUCHMANN, T.; BISCHOFF, O. Blockchain-driven handling of digital freight information: A tensions perspective. Logistics Research, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 1-16, 2021. DOI: 10.23773/2021_3.
GUNDUZ, M. A.; DEMIR, S.; PAKSOY, T. Matching functions of supply chain management with smart and sustainable Tools: a novel hybrid BWM-QFD based method. Computers and Industrial Engineering, [s. l.], v. 162, p. 107676, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107676
HAN, H.; TRIMI, S. Towards a data science platform for improving SME collaboration
through Industry 4.0 technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s. l.], v. 174, p. 121242, Jan. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121242
HARRISON, T. M.; GUERRERO, S.; BURKE, G. B.; COOK, M. E., CRESSWELL, A. M.; HELBIG, N.; HRDINOV, J.; PARDO, T. A. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 83–97, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0269
HEEKS, R.; BAILUR, S. Analyzing e-government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, Manchester, v. 24, n. 2, p. 243–265, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
HOFMANN, P.; SAMP, C.; URBACH, N. Robotic process automation. Electronic
Markets, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 99–106, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00365-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00365-8
HOGNOGI, G.-G.; POP, A.-M.; MARIAN-POTRA, A.-C.; SOMEȘFĂLEAN, T. The role of UAS–GIS in digital Era governance: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, Switzerland, v. 13, n. 19, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911097
JANSSEN, M.; HELBIG, N. Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: policy-makers be prepared! Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 4, p. S99–S105, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009. Supplement. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009
KAMALALDIN, A.; LINDE, L.; SJÖDIN, D.; PARIDA, V. Transforming provider-customer relationships in digital servitization: a relational view on digitalization. Industrial Marketing Management, [s. l.], v. 89, p. 306–325, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.004
KAPPELMAN, L.; JOHNSON, V.; TORRES, R.; MAURER, C.; MCLEAN, E. A study of information systems issues, practices, and leadership in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 26–42, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1497929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1497929
KESSLER, M. M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 10–25, 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
KOHLI, R.; JOHNSON, S. Digital transformation in latecomer industries: CIO and CEO leadership lessons from Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. MIS Quarterly Executive, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 141–156, 2011.
KÜCHER, A.; FELDBAUER-DURSTMÜLLER, B. Organizational failure and decline: a bibliometric study of the scientific frontend. Journal of Business Research, [s. l.], n. 98, p. 503–516, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.017
KYRYCHENKO, M.; YAKUBOVSKIY, S.; RODIONOVA, T. Digital Transformation of the Oil Refining Sector in Ukraine. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Info communications, 2020, Kharkiv. Conference […]. Kharkiv: IEEE. 2020. p. 733-736. DOI: 10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468064
LAUFER, M.; LEISER, A.; DEACON, B.; BRICHAMBAUT, P. P.; FECHER, B.; KOBSDA, C.; HESSE F. Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 1, 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
LAYNE, K.; LEE, J. Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 122–136, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
LEÃO, P.; SILVA, M. M. Impacts of digital transformation on firms’ competitive advantages: a systematic literature review. Strategic Change, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 5, p. 421–441, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2459
LEE, J. 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 3, p. 220–230, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009
LEE-GEILLER, S.; LEE, T. D. Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: a conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 2, p. 208–225, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003
LINDERS, D.; LIAO, C. Z.-P.; WANG, C.-M. Proactive e-Governance: flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 4, p. S68–S76, 2018. Supplement. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004
LOUBÈRE, L.; RATINAUD, P. Documentation IRaMuTeQ. [S. l.]: IRaMuTeQ, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/documentation_19_02_2014.pdf. Acesso em: 5 set. 2021.
MARCHE, S.; MCNIVEN, J. D. E-government and e-governance: the future isn’t what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 74–86, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x
MARTINEZ-BALLESTE, A.; PEREZ-MARTINEZ, P.; SOLANAS, A. The pursuit of citizens’ privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible. IEEE Communications Magazine, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 6, p. 136–141, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525606
MCCAIN, K. W. Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 4, p. 491–516, 1991. DOI: 10.1177/016224399101600404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600404
MCCAIN, N. L.; LYNN, M. R. Meta-Analysis of a Narrative Review: studies evaluating patient teaching. Western Journal of Nursing Research, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 347–358, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599001200307
MCNUTT, J. G.; JUSTICE, J. B.; MELITSKI, J. M.; AHN, M. J.; SIDDIQUI, S. R.; CARTER, D. T.; Kline, A. D. The diffusion of civic technology and open government in the United States. Information Polity, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 153–170, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160385
MOON, M. J. The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 62, n. 4, p. 424–433, July/Aug. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
MORESI, E. A. D.; PINHO, I. Proposta de abordagem para refinamento de pesquisa bibliográfica. New Trends in Qualitative Research, Portugal, v. 9, p. 11–20, 2021. DOI: 10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20
MORESI, E. A. D., PINHO, I., Costa, A. P. How to operate literature review through qualitative and quantitative analysis integration? IN: COSTA, A. P., MOREIRA, A., SÁNCHEZ-GÓMEZ, M. C., WA-MBALEKA, S. (ed.). Computer Supported Qualitative Research. WCQR 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. [S. l.]: Springer, n. 466, p. 194-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04680-3_13
NEWMAN, M. Networks: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
NEWMAN, Y. C.; AGYIN-BIRIKORANG, S.; ADJEI, M. B.; SCHOLBERG, M. L.; SILVEIRA, J. M. B.; VENDRAMINI, J. E.; RECHCIGL, L. E.; SOLLENBERGER, CHRYSOSTOME, M. Enhancing Phosphorus Phytoremedation Potential of Two Warm-Season Perennial Grasses with Nitrogen Fertilization. Agronomy Journal, [s. l.], v. 101, n. 6, p. 1345–1351, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0163
NIELSEN, M. M. E-governance and stage models: analysis of identified models and selected Eurasian experiences in digitising citizen service delivery. Electronic Government, an International Journal, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 107–141, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.076132
PASADEOS, Y.; PHELPS, J.; KIM, B.-H. Disciplinary Impact of Advertising Scholars: temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 4, p. 53–70, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673569
PEREIRA, G. V.; PARYCEK, P.; FALCO, E.; KLEINHANS, R. Smart governance in the context of smart cities: a literature review. Information Polity, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 143–162, 2018. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067
PRITCHARD, R. D. Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 176–211, 1969. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(69)90005-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90005-1
PIZZI, S.; VENTURELLI, A.; VARIALE, M.; MACARIO, G. P. Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, v. 67, 101738, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738
RAGHURAM, S.; TUERTSCHER, P.; GARUD, R. Research Note: mapping the field of virtual work - a cocitation analysis. Information Systems Research, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 983–999, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0227
RANGANATHAN, C.; TEO, T. S. H.; DHALIWAL, J. Web-enabled supply chain management: Key antecedents and performance impacts. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 6, p. 533–545, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.004
REDDICK, C. G.; CHATFIELD, A. T.; JARAMILLO, P. A. Public opinion on National Security Agency surveillance programs: a multi-method approach. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 2, p. 129–141, Apr. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.003
ROY, J. E-government in Canada: transformation for the digital age. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book4431
RUHNAU, B. Eigenvector-centrality: a node-centrality? Social Networks, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 357–365, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00031-9
SANDOVAL-ALMAZAN, R.; GIL-GARCIA, J. R. Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 29, p. S72–S81, Jan. 2012. Supplemet 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.004
SANDVIK, K. B. The Norwegian COVID-19 Tracing App Experiment: lessons for governance and civic activism. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 66–73, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3101824
SAXENA, K. B. C. Towards excellence in e-governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 6, p. 498–513, 2005. DOI 10.1108/09513550510616733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733
SHARMA, R.; MISHRA, R.; MISHRA, A. Determinants of satisfaction among social entrepreneurs in e-Government services. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 60, p. 102386, Oct. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102386
SMALL, G. W.; RABINS, P. V.; BARRY, P. P.; BUCKHOLTZ, N. S.; DEKOSKY, S. T.; FERRIS, S. H.; FINKEL, S. I.; GWYTHER, L. P.; KHACHATURIAN, Z. S.; LEBOWITZ, B. D.; MCRAE, T. D.; MORRIS, J. C.; OAKLEY, F.; SCHNEIDER, L. S.; STREIM, J. E.; SUNDERLAND, T.; TERI, L. A.; TUNE, E. L. Diagnosis and Treatment of Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders: consensus statement of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer’s Association, and the American Geriatrics Society. JAMA, [s. l.], v. 278, n. 16, p. 1363–1371, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550160083043
SMALL, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 4, p. 265–269, July/Aug. 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
SMALL, H.; GRIFFITH, B. C. The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 17-40, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400102
SOUSSAN, T.; TROVATI, M. Sentiment urgency emotion conversion over time for business intelligence. International Journal of Web Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 5, p. 519-528, Oct. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-08-2020-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-08-2020-0049
SU, R.; OBRENOVIC, B.; DU, J.; GODINIC, D.; KHUDAYKULOV, A. COVID-19 Pandemic Implications for Corporate Sustainability and Society: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [s. l.], v. 19, p. 1-23, Jan. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031592
TABAR, S.; SHARMA, S.; VOLKMAN, D.; LEE, H. Analyzing the network readiness index in the United States to assess ICT infrastructure in handling crises like COVID-19. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), [s. l.], v. 17, n. 4, p. 1–14, 2021. DOI: 10.4018/IJEGR.2021100101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021100101
TANGI, L.; JANSSEN, M.; BENEDETTI, M.; NOCI, G. Digital government transformation: a structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, [s. l.], v. 60, p. 102356, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
TEO, T. S. H.; SRIVASTAVA, S. C.; JIANG, L. Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 3, p. 99–132, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
THOMAS, J. C.; STREIB, G. The new face of government: citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 83–102, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug010
ÜSDIKEN, B.; PASADEOS, Y. Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe:
a comparison of co-citation networks. Organization Studies, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 503–526, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., Wolfram, D. (eds.). Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. New York: Springer, 2014. p 285–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, 2022.
WALTMAN, L.; VAN ECK, N. J.; NOYONS, E. C. M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 629-635, Out. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
WEERAKKODY, V.; JANSSEN, M.; DWIVEDI, Y. K. Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 320–328, July. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
WEST, D. M. E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. 15–27, Feb. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
WHITE, M. D.; MARSH, E. E. Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library Trends, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 1, p. 22-45, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
WHITE, H. D.; MCCAIN, K. W. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 4, p. 327–355, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-W
YILDIZ, M. E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 646–665, July. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
YUCEL, S. Estimating the benefits, drawbacks and risk of digital transformation strategy. In: 2018 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 2018, Las Vegas. Anais […]. Las Vegas: IEEE, 2008. p. 233-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI46756.2018.00051
YURKEVICH, E. V.; STEPANOVSKAYA, I. A.; KRYUKOVA, L. N. Mechanisms of Information Support for the Digital Transformation of Space Complexes Based on the Concept of Socio-cyber-physical Self-organization. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’21). [S. l.]: Springer Link, 2022, v. 330, p. 629-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_62
ZENG, Z.; LI, S.; LIAN, J.-W.; ZENG, Z.; LI, S.; LIAN, J.-W.; LI, J., CHEN, T., LI, Y. Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: a perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework. Land Use Policy, [s. l.], v. 109, Oct. p. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105629
ZUPIC, I.; ČATER, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 429–472, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi, Wanderson Aparecido da Silva Alves, Ana Paula Bernardi da Silva, Helga Cristina Hedler
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
- La publicación se reserva el direcho de realizar, en los originales, cambios de orden normativa, ortográfica y gramatical, para mantener la norma culta del idioma, respetando el estilo de los autores;
- Las pruebas finales no seran enviadas a los autores;
- Los trabajos publicados pasan a ser propriedad de la revista Ciência da Informação, siendo su reimpresión total o parcial, sujeta a autorización expresa de la dirección del IBICT;
- Debe ser consignada la fuente de publicação original;
- Són de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores las opiniones emitidas en sus artículos;
- Cada autor recibirá dos ejemplares de la revista, caso esté disponible en el formato impreso.