Analysis of co-authoring and board of examiners networks of graduate programs: Evidence on the performance of teachers in the interdisciplinary area for the 2013-2016 quadrennium

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v51i1.5262

Keywords:

rede de coautoria, rede de banca, colaboração científica, tipo de gestão universitária, correlação de redes colaborativas., cientometria, produção científica

Abstract

Scientific collaboration is a common practice for the construction and dissemination of knowledge and one of the products is the publication of co-authored scientific articles. These publications form a network of co-authors, and the study of these networks helps to understand aspects of collaboration and construction of knowledge. This co-authorship network can be analyzed using complex network measures to make the comparison easier between programs, such as the shortest average path, clustering coefficient, density, among other measures. Other types of scientific collaboration also generate a network of contacts, such as the network of mutual participating in board of examiners. In Brazil, science is mainly produced in the stricto sensu postgraduate programs of universities, which are evaluated and classified by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel(CAPES – directly translation of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior). As each area of ​​knowledge is evaluated differently, this work makes a study of the stricto sensu programs of the Interdisciplinary area, subarea of ​​engineering, technology and management for the 2013-2016 quadrennium. The objective is to evaluate the scientific collaboration between professors of the same program from the network of co-authorship of articles. The conclusion is that networks have different characteristics according to the type of management (public or private), and if a program has a network that indicates greater internal collaboration among researchers for a type of scientific production (co-authorship or boards), this is reflects on the other network

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Solon Macedonia Soares, Universidade Nove de Julho

    Mestre em Informática e Gestão do Conhecimento pela Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) - Brasil.

  • Pedro Henrique Triguis Schimit, Universidade Nove de Julho

    Pós-Doutorado pela Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (Mackenzie) - Brasil. Doutor em Ciências pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - São Paulo, SP - Brasil. Professor da Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) - São Paulo, SP – Brasil.

References

ALDIERI, L.; KOTSEMI, M.; VINCI, C.P. The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 2018. 13p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003

AMARAL, R.M.; BRITO, A.G.C.; ROCHA, K.G.D.S.; QUONIAM, L.M.; FARIA, L.I.L. Panorama da inteligência competitiva no Brasil: os pesquisadores e a produção científica na plataforma Lattes. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Escola de Ciencia da Informacao da UFMG, 2016. 97p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2687

Autran, M.M.M. et al. Perfil de produção acadêmica dos programas brasileiros de pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação 2008-2012. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 2015. 57p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2434

BARABÁSI A.L. et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physical A, 2002. 590p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7

BEAVER, D.D.; ROSEN, R. Studies in scientific collaboration Part I: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1978. 65p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840

BRASIL. Portaria No 59, de 22 de março de 2017. Estabelece Regulamento para a Avaliação Quadrienal 2017. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/legislacao/27032017-PORTARIA-N-59-DE-22-DE-MARCO-DE-2017.pdf>. Acesso em: 05 out. 2019.

CAPES. Interdisciplinar. 2019a. Última atualização: 26 set 2019. Disponível em: <http://capes.gov.br/avaliacao/sobre-as-areas-de-avaliacao/76-dav/caa4/4674-interdisciplinar>. Acesso em: 5 out. 2019.

CAPES. Engenharia III. 2019b. Última atualização: 8 nov 2019. Disponível em: <http://capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/avaliacao/relatorios-finais-quadrienal-2017/20122017-ENGENHARIAS-III-quadrienal.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2019

GUARIDO FILHO, E.R.; MACHADO DA SILVA, C. L.; ROSSONI, L. The social and intellectual dimensions in the construction of scientific knowledge: the institutional theory in organization studies in Brazil. Brazilian Administration Review, 2010. 136p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922010000200003

HADDAD, E.A; MENA-CHALCO, J.P.; SIDONE, O. Produção científica e redes de colaboração dos docentes vinculados aos programas de pós-graduação em Economia no Brasil. São Paulo, Estudos Econômicos, 2017. 617p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-416147414ejo

MENA-CHALCO, J.P. et al. Brazilian bibliometric coauthorship networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014. 1424p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23010

NEWMAN, M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review e, 2001a. 1p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131

NEWMAN, M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review e, 2001b 1p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132

NEWMAN, M.E.J. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM Review, Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM), [s.I.], 2003. 167p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480

NEWMAN, M.E.J. Who Is the Best Connected Scientist? A Study of Scientific Coauthorship Networks. Complex Networks, 2004. 337p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44485-5_16

PEREZ-CERVANTES, E. et al. Using Link Prediction to Estimate the Collaborative Influence of Researchers. 2013 Ieee 9th International Conference On E-science, 2013. 293p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2013.32

RIBEIRO, R.C.; MAGALHÃES, A.M. Política de responsabilidade social na universidade: Conceitos e desafios. Educação, Sociedade e Cultura, 2014. 133p.

SIDONE, O.J.G.; HADDAD,E.A.; MENA-CHALCO, J.P. A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração científica. Transinformação, FapUNIFESP (SciELO), [s.I.], 2016. 15p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800002

SOARES, S.M.; SCHIMIT, P.H.T. A co-authorship network analysis of research from graduate programs of the interdisciplinary area in Brazil. In: XL Ibero-Latin-American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, 2019, 1p.

SOUZA, C.G.; FERREIRA, M.L.A. Researchers profile, co-authorship pattern and knowledge organization in information science in Brazil. Scientometrics, 2012. 673p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0882-7

XIE, Z.; LI, J.; LI, M. Exploring Cooperative Game Mechanisms of Scientific oauthorship Networks. Complexity, 2018. 1p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9173186

ZHANG, P. et al. Proactive rumor control in online network. World Wide Web, 2018. 1799p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-018-0623-9

Published

18/10/2022

Issue

Section

Articles