Rediscovering the collectivity in the intellectual property scope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2023v10n1.p291-305Keywords:
commons, collectivity, Intellectual PropertyAbstract
The concept of commons originated in the material domain, but in recent decades, it has been extended to intellectual property, opposing to historically constructed restrictions and promoting models of open access and collaboration. In this perspective, the present work constructed, through bibliographical research, a historical synthesis of the commons, and performed a comparison between the processes that occurred in the domains of material goods and intellectual property. It is observed that, in antiquity, the former had a more collective than private aspect, but underwent a process of closure, becoming mostly individual. Intangible assets, on the other hand, also presented themselves as collective, and underwent a similar process of closure, based on the recognition of their form of ownership and the creation of laws for their protection. However, unlike material goods, there was a turnabout: the recovering and re-adaptation of shared property and collaborative creation, promoting a movement for reopening the immaterial commons.
Downloads
References
AXELROD, P.; FUERCH, M. Common Ground: Risk, Scarcity, and Shared Resources in Goan Agriculture. Human Ecology, v. 34, n. 1, p. 79–98, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-9003-z
BAHN, P.; LORBLANCHET, M.; SOULAGES, P. The First Artists: In Search of the World’s Oldest Art. Illustrated edition ed. New York, NY: Thames & Hudson, 2017.
BEHME, T. D. Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Minnesota, 2007.
BIAGIOLI, M.; GALISON, P. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. [s.l.] Routledge, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203954270
BONVOISIN, J. et al. What is the “Source” of Open Source Hardware?. Journal of Open Hardware, v. 1, n. 1, p. 5, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joh.7
BOWLES, S.; CHOI, J.-K. The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution and the Origins of Private Property. Journal of Political Economy, v. 127, n. 5, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/701789
BRAGA, R. R. P.; LARA, M. D. Justificativa da proteção da propriedade privada na filosofia ocidental: da antiguidade ao iluminismo. Estado, democracia e cidadania: perspectivas teóricas e críticas, 2019.
BRAVO, G. From Paris Convention to TRIPS: A Brief History. J. Contemp. Legal Issues, v. 12, p. 445, 2001.
BULZICO, B. A. A. Evolução da regulamentação internacional da Propriedade intelectual e os novos rumos para harmonizar a legislação. Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia, v. 1, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rbdi.v4i4.9603
BUNING, M. C. The history of copyright protection of computer software: the emancipation of a work of technology toward a work of authorship. Em: LEEUW, K. D.; BERGSTRA, J. (Eds.). The History of Information Security. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2007. p. 121–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451608-4/50006-7
CARVALHO, N. T. P. A estrutura dos sistemas de patentes e de marcas: passado, presente e futuro. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2009.
DIBONA, C.; OCKMAN, S.; STONE, M. Open sources: voices from the open source revolution. 1st ed ed. Beijing ; Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 1999.
FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION. Por que Copyleft?. Disponível em: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-copyleft.html. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2023.
FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION. O que é o software livre?. Disponível em: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#four-freedoms. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2022.
HANSEN, André; HOWARD, Thomas J. The current state of open source hardware: The need for an open source development platform. ICoRD'13: Global Product Development, p. 977-988, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_77
HARDIN, G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, v. 162, n. 3859, p. 1243–1248, 1968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
HERRERA, A. The Promises and Challenges of Open Source Hardware. Computer, v. 53, n. 10, p. 101–104, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.3011080
HESSE, C. The Rise of Intellectual Property, 700 B.C.-A.D. 2000: An Idea in the Balance. Daedalus, v. 131, n. 2, p. 26–45, 2002.
KERNIGHAN, B. W. UNIX: a history and a memoir. [s.l.] Kindle Direct Publishing, 2020.
MACAULAY, B. T. B. Delphi Complete Works of Thomas Babington Macaulay. 1st edition ed. [s.l.] Delphi Classics, 2016.
MACHLUP, F.; PENROSE, E. The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century*. The Journal of Economic History, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–29, 1950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700055893
MAHONEY, M. S. What Makes the History of Software Hard. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, v. 30, n. 3, p. 8–18, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2008.55
MALAVOTA, L.; MARTINS, M. A Exposição Universal de Viena de 1873 e o Congresso Internacional sobre Patentes. Revista Brasileira de História da Ciência, v. 14, n. 1, p. 22–35, ago. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53727/rbhc.v14i1.466
MARTÍNEZ-SEVILLA, F. et al. Who painted that? The authorship of Schematic rock art at the Los Machos rockshelter in southern Iberia. Antiquity, v. 94, n. 377, p. 1133–1151, out. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.140
MARX, K. O Capital - Livro I: Crítica da Economia Política. o Processo de Produção do Capital. 2ª edição ed. [s.l.] : Boitempo Editorial, 2011.
MELLEMA, C. L. Copyright Protection for Computer Software: an International View. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, v. 11, n. 1, 1 jan. 1984.
NOGUEIRA, I. Desapropriação-A propriedade: seu conteúdo e seus limites na antiguidade, idade média e moderna. Revista de Direito Administrativo, v. 2, n. 1, p. 93–99, 1945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v2.1945.8120
OSTROM, E. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review, v. 92, n. 1, p. 1–22, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925
PRAGER, F. D. A History of Intellectual Property from 1545 to 1787. Journal of the Patent Office Society, v. 26, p. 711, 1944.
RAYMOND, E. The Art of UNIX Programming. 1st edition ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
SCHARF, N. Creative Commons-ense? An analysis of tensions between copyright law and Creative Commons. Journal of intellectual property law & practice, v. 12, n. 5, p. 376–383, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx023
SCHIRRU, L. Os Commons de conhecimento:: Conceito, distinções e uma análise sob o feixe de direitos. PIDCC: Revista em propriedade intelectual direito contemporâneo, v. 10, n. 1, p. 167–182, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16928/2316-8080.V10N1p.167-182
SCHURMANN, H. F. Traditional Property Concepts in China. The Far Eastern Quarterly, v. 15, n. 4, p. 507–516, 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2941921
STALLMAN, R. Sobre o Projeto GNU. Disponível em: https://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2022.
STALLMAN, R. M. Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software. Disponível em: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html.en. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2022.
STALLMAN, R. M.; GAY, J. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston, MA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2009.
THE FREEBSD PROJECT. Why you should use a BSD style license for your Open Source Project. Disponível em: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/bsdl-gpl/. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2023.
ZANINI, L. E. A. O estatuto da Rainha Ana : estudos em comemoração dos 300 anos da primeira lei de copyright. Revista de Doutrina da 4a Região, out. 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vitor da Silva Gonçalves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal is published under the Creative Commons - Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Brazil.
The published work is considered collaboration and therefore the author will not receive any remuneration for this as well as anything will be charged in exchange for publication.
All texts are responsibility of the authors.
It’s allowed partial or total reproduction of the texts of the magazine since the source is cited.
