Innovation and Actor-Network Theory
pluridisciplinary and interthematic problems networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2024v11n1e-6889Keywords:
Sociology of innovation, Innovation, Actor-network theory, Scientific communicationAbstract
Sociology of innovation is a transdisciplinary approach to research and development whose theoretical-methodological framework is based on the Actor-Network Theory. The article aims to map scientific communications produced in the literature about innovation and Actor-Network Theory (ANT). As bibliographical research, a semiotic-material approach is used to map these research interests on the Dimensions scientific data platform, seeking to explore their problematization networks via word co-occurrence and clustering with the VOSviewer network analysis software, in addition to describing their translational movements based on the titles and summaries of the mapped research itself and the literature itself in some way related. Two problematization networks about innovation and ANT are explored, one being multidisciplinary (see relationships between different fields of research such as health, management and technologies) and the other interthematic (through actor-words such as “implementation”, “framework” and “knowledge”. Such research interests are crossed by the very semiotic-material complexity of scientific production and communication related to ANT and innovation, performing socio-technical and political-economic processes of invention, negotiation and commercialization between human and non-human actors, of somehow linked to different knowledge and domains of scientific and technological knowledge.
Downloads
References
AKA, K. G. Actor-network theory to understand, track and succeed in a sustainable innovation development process. Journal of Cleaner Production, v.225, p.524-540, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.351. Acesso em: 20 out. 2023.
AKRICH, M., CALLON, M.; LATOUR, B. A Quoi Tient Le Succès des Innovations? 1. L’Art de l’Intéressement. Annales des Mines, [s.l.], v. 11, p. 4–17, 1988. Disponível em: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00081741/document. Acesso em: 8 abr. 2023.
ANDRADE, T. de. Inovação e ciências sociais: em busca de novos referenciais. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 20, n. 58, p. 145–156, jun. 2005. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbcsoc/a/pzM6rFj3g8VDZwRpQHRtBTm/?lang=pt#. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2023.
AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS (ABS). Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC). Disponível em: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc. Acesso em: 4 dez. 2024.
CALLON, M. Markets in the making: rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. New York: Zone Books, 2021.
CALLON, M.; LAW, J.; RIP, A. (eds.). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: The Macmillan Press, 1986. Cap. 7, p. 103-123.
CAVALCANTI, C. X. A abordagem da inovação na perspectiva sociotécnica de Michel Callon. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS, 4., 2016, Porto Alegre. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: SBEO, out. 2016. Disponível em: https://anaiscbeo.emnuvens.com.br/cbeo/article/download/185/177. Acesso em: 21 mar. 2022.
CHRISTOVÃO, H. T.; BRAGA, G. M. Ciência da informação e sociologia do conhecimento científico: a intertematicidade plural. Campinas, Transinformação, v. 9, n. 3, set./dez. p. 33-45, 1997. Disponível em: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/issue/view/253. Acesso em: 5 jan. 2023.
CORSINI, L. The making of a makerspace in Ethiopia: A study of legitimacy using Actor-Network Theory. Africa Journal of Management, v. 8, n. 3, p. 399-424, 2022. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1150192809. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
DUPRET, K.; FRIBORG, B. Workarounds in the Danish Health Sector: from tacit to explicit innovation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, v. 8, n. S3, 2018. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1103366071. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
KAUFFELD-MONZ, M.; FRITSCH, M. Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis. Regional Studies, v. 47, n. 5, p. 669–685, 2013. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029294321. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
JARRAHI, M. H.; SAWYER, S. Networks of innovation: the sociotechnical assemblage of tabletop computing. Research Policy X, v. 1, p. 100001, 2019. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1111456907. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
JAPIASSU, H. Interdisciplinaridade e patologia do saber. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1976.
LATOUR, Bruno. A esperança de Pandora: ensaio sobre a realidade dos estudos científicos. Bauru: EDUSC, 2001.
LATOUR, Bruno. Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2000.
LAW, John (ed.). A Sociology of Monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London; New York: Routledge, 1991.
LAWLOR, J.; KAVANAGH, D. Infighting and fitting in: Following innovation in the stent actor–network. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 44, p. 32–41, 2015. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1005013858. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
LIAOJI, Z. et al. The Endogenous Mode of Beautiful Rural Construction: A Case of China. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, v. 08, n. 04, p. 349–370, 2020. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1133217951. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
PRODANOV, C. C.; FREITAS, E. C. Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2. ed. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2013.
RICO, A. L. Dicionário Startupês: os significados dos principais termos do ecossistema empreendedor. São José dos Campos, 2019.
TRIANGGONO, B.; WILOSO, P. G.; SASONGKO, G. Pariwisata Dalam Perspektif Actor Network Theory. Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona, v. 3, n. 2, p. 91–104, 2018. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1112057977. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
TURNER, S. et al. Analysing barriers to service improvement using a multi‐level theory of innovation: the case of glaucoma outpatient clinics. Sociology of Health & Illness, v. 40, n. 4, p. 654–669, 2018. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1101024989. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
SATTLEGGER, L. Negotiating attachments to plastic. Social Studies of Science, v. 51, n. 6, p. 820–845, 2021. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1139432803. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
SCHRAMM, Laurier L. Innovation Technology: A Dictionary. Berlin; London: De Gruyter, 2017.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultura, 1997.
SÖDERHOLM, K; SÖDERHOLM, P. Industrial Energy Transitions and the Dynamics of Innovation Systems: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry, 1970–2010. Environments, v. 7, n. 9, p. 70, 2020. Disponível em: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1130782426. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 14/08/2024 (2)
- 03/07/2024 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zayr Claudio Gomes da Silva, Ronaldo Ferreira de Araújo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal is published under the Creative Commons - Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Brazil.
The published work is considered collaboration and therefore the author will not receive any remuneration for this as well as anything will be charged in exchange for publication.
All texts are responsibility of the authors.
It’s allowed partial or total reproduction of the texts of the magazine since the source is cited.
